---

Just sounds like more work.

---

I'm not talking about lighthearted replies to spammy topics.  I'm talking about posts that members KNOW are going to be deleted, such as spamfuck's "omgsgsahjgha111fa" and members who post replies for the sole purpose of getting points such as "aaaaaaaaa" or "o rly?"

PS. This is not to stop spam, it is to discourage dishonest members from benefiting from spam.

Post edited at 9:04 pm on Jan. 6, 2007 by penguincube

-------
firman consensus facit

-------
In Soviet Russia, anti christ bans moderators!
Last.fm

---

So if someone posts crap like "Shud I jerk off to her", with a link to some huge-tit whore, then someone quotes it and says 'whatever floats your boat', and I say 'Those could float a destroyer, actually', or a something of the sort, it would not fall under this?

---

---

Quote: from Newfie at 10:52 pm on Jan. 6, 2007

---

Quote: from ChemicEmotions at 1:20 am on Jan. 7, 2007

---

Quote: from Newfie at 10:49 pm on Jan. 6, 2007

---

Quote: from Explorer4x4 at 1:16 am on Jan. 7, 2007

---

What the fuck? Why are we being punished for spammers?

---

were being punished for replying to spammers.  If you don't reply to them, it'll stop them from posting pretty much because they only want attention, and well, if we don't reply they'll stop spamming.

---

 

  How do we know if they're really spamming or they're just being complete and utter idiots with a topic? It's hard to tell idiots from spammers =\

---

Well, I'm sure he won't punish you if you go into a topic thats stupid, but not spam and say something about it. But if you just write some sort of spam to go along with it, yu should loose points.  I think he's mainly trying to stop the spam outbreaks., that are topics that just say "spam' or "aotheaoejlae" in it.  If you reply to them, you obviously know its spam.  He wouldn't do it for a stupid, but not spam topic.  Take it up with him though to be sure.

---

But you see, to me, that topic "Literacy is overrated" is spam, but technically it isn't. The OP is just a complete dumbass who needs to be banned for being one.

---

---

Quote: from DoomMaker at 12:06 am on Jan. 7, 2007

---

So if someone posts crap like "Shud I jerk off to her", with a link to some huge-tit whore, then someone quotes it and says 'whatever floats your boat', and I say 'Those could float a destroyer, actually', or a something of the sort, it would not fall under this?  

 

---

Please note my definition of spam-attack.  If we are 5 minutes into one person creating multiple accounts to keep posting said  huge-tit whore, and the same members keep on replying, then possibly.  Otherwise, no.

---

Post edited at 9:26 pm on Jan. 6, 2007 by virginiaraexxo

Somehow this new policy feels more born of blind frustration than careful planning...

-------
Vote for REAL change.

Currently, its just nothing at all..................... How do you expect banned members to NOT create accounts and spam?!? You'd almost be stupid not to.

Believe me, it only encourages the act of spamming. If people just leave it alone, spammers no longer have anything to feed off of.

Its only common sense. Speaking from personal experience ofcourse.

Not one bit..

-------
You do what you have to do.
There's nothing wrong.
If someone needs killing.
You Kill 'Em.