LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 803 users online 222937 members 1219 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
randomrocks
Interests: movies, music, books, God, guys
Mood: Confused
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
3 online / 60 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / Science & Business / Viewing Topic

"Designer Babies"
Germline Engineering
Replies: 37Last Post Mar. 8, 2007 3:42am by goodman
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 3  Next » Email Print Favorite
Seafercat

Guru

Patron
Reply
Quote: from xxkat at 5:56 pm on Feb. 22, 2007

Quote: from TheOtherHorseman at 8:46 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Quote: from xxkat at 11:43 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Yeah, I don't like the idea of it.    
 I still don't even know if I like the idea of them taking away diseases, because that is still "playing God", and maybe because that disease got taken away another one might develop.    
 

 

 Where does one draw the line at playing God? Is it playing God to mend a broken bone? Are we trampling in God's garden if we use chemotherapy to treat cancer? Are we pissing in His eye if we use respirators to keep someone alive long enough for them to recover full functionality on their own?  

 At one point, exactly, do we cross from the allowable into the forbidden land?


Yeah but by the point your bone is broken and your getting chemotherapy you have already developed the disease and you've already suffered from it.


so, i'm a little confused -- what you're saying is, it's okay to fix, but not prevent?


8:58 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: April 2006 | Days Active: 718
Join to learn more about Seafercat Luxembourg | Female | Posts: 17,347 | Points: 24,448
LiveWire Humor
Seafercat

Guru

Patron
Reply
Quote: from Vintorez at 5:58 pm on Feb. 22, 2007

Quote: from Seafercat at 11:54 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

i don't see how someone can say "it's not the scientists' right to play God" -- how is it your right to decide who and who doesn't "play god"?

As a religious person, God>>>>>>>>man, and it's not man's place to do His job. Man should learn their place.


so, you're telling me it's your right to tell people what to do, because you're religious? yeah, okay.


8:59 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: April 2006 | Days Active: 718
Join to learn more about Seafercat Luxembourg | Female | Posts: 17,347 | Points: 24,448
TheOtherHorseman


Where shall wisdom be found?

Patron
Support Leader
Reply
Quote: from xxkat at 11:56 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Quote: from TheOtherHorseman at 8:46 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Quote: from xxkat at 11:43 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Yeah, I don't like the idea of it.    
 I still don't even know if I like the idea of them taking away diseases, because that is still "playing God", and maybe because that disease got taken away another one might develop.    
 

 

 Where does one draw the line at playing God? Is it playing God to mend a broken bone? Are we trampling in God's garden if we use chemotherapy to treat cancer? Are we pissing in His eye if we use respirators to keep someone alive long enough for them to recover full functionality on their own?  

 At one point, exactly, do we cross from the allowable into the forbidden land?


Yeah but by the point your bone is broken and your getting chemotherapy you have already developed the disease and you've already suffered from it.


Would you not agree that if one had the power to prevent someone from breaking a leg or getting cancer, it would be an evil thing to withold that power instead of sparing someone suffering or death?

-------
"My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"


9:01 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: June 2003 | Days Active: 1,754
Join to learn more about TheOtherHorseman Pennsylvania, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 15,476 | Points: 43,786
Vintorez

Swami

Patron
Reply
Quote: from Seafercat at 11:59 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Quote: from Vintorez at 5:58 pm on Feb. 22, 2007

Quote: from Seafercat at 11:54 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

i don't see how someone can say "it's not the scientists' right to play God" -- how is it your right to decide who and who doesn't "play god"?
 

 As a religious person, God>>>>>>>>man, and it's not man's place to do His job. Man should learn their place.


so, you're telling me it's your right to tell people what to do, because you're religious? yeah, okay.


You're an idiot, I never told anybody to do anything, I simply SHARED my OPINION, and I didn't force my opinion on you or anybody else. I hate when idiots try and make situations into something their not.

We were put on the Earth to SERVE God. That's a fact.  And last time I checked, as servants, we don't try to overtake God's throne.


9:08 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: Dec. 2006 | Days Active: 828
Join to learn more about Vintorez Lithuania | Posts: 16,191 | Points: 26,323
TheOtherHorseman


Where shall wisdom be found?

Patron
Support Leader
Reply
You have so far failed, Vintorez, to provide any clear line between man's realm of authority, in which he is permitted to play, and God's thoneroom.

-------
"My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"

9:10 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: June 2003 | Days Active: 1,754
Join to learn more about TheOtherHorseman Pennsylvania, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 15,476 | Points: 43,786
happygoluckyelf


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from TheOtherHorseman at 12:01 am on Feb. 22, 2007

Would you not agree that if one had the power to prevent someone from breaking a leg or getting cancer, it would be an evil thing to withold that power instead of sparing someone suffering or death?


Yes, that would be ideal, and I think it would be good to use genetics for good like that, but come on: if we have learned anything about human tendencies through history isn't it that we try to use technology to gain power and control others in our favor? Think about it. I personally doubt that genetic engineering of children would simple result in the prevention of disease. It would be used to create "normal" kids, who looked and behaved exactly as the parents thought they should, and again if they didn't well then that kid is just a "mistake." Shallow gene pools would become an increasing problem, and eventually it could lead to a pandemic that could wipe out almost the whole population because all people who were genetically engineered could have the same weakness. I think the whole thing just creates more problems than it solves.

-------
"Nothing endures but change"


9:12 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: Feb. 2006 | Days Active: 111
Join to learn more about happygoluckyelf Michigan, United States | Straight Female | Posts: 521 | Points: 1,700
TheOtherHorseman


Where shall wisdom be found?

Patron
Support Leader
Reply
Are we to completely abandon the pursuit of knowledge out of terror over what horrors might be born from it?  Furthermore, are we to pretend that we have PhD's in genetics that enable us to talk on the consequences of the practical uses of such knowledge as if we are authorities?

-------
"My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"

9:15 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: June 2003 | Days Active: 1,754
Join to learn more about TheOtherHorseman Pennsylvania, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 15,476 | Points: 43,786
xxkat


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Seafercat at 8:58 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Quote: from xxkat at 5:56 pm on Feb. 22, 2007

Quote: from TheOtherHorseman at 8:46 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Quote: from xxkat at 11:43 pm on Feb. 21, 2007

Yeah, I don't like the idea of it.      
  I still don't even know if I like the idea of them taking away diseases, because that is still "playing God", and maybe because that disease got taken away another one might develop.      
  

   

  Where does one draw the line at playing God? Is it playing God to mend a broken bone? Are we trampling in God's garden if we use chemotherapy to treat cancer? Are we pissing in His eye if we use respirators to keep someone alive long enough for them to recover full functionality on their own?    

  At one point, exactly, do we cross from the allowable into the forbidden land?


 

 Yeah but by the point your bone is broken and your getting chemotherapy you have already developed the disease and you've already suffered from it.


 

so, i'm a little confused -- what you're saying is, it's okay to fix, but not prevent?


yeah, basically, but I mean go ahead and take the gene of some disease away, I just think something bad will come from it like later in life that person may develop some new disease because their old one was taken away. It's kind of like picking at a red bump and its gone for a few hours and then you get an ugly whitehead in its place haha sorry for the bad metaphor.

Post edited at 9:33 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 by xxkat


9:20 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: July 2005 | Days Active: 167
Join to learn more about xxkat Canada | Straight Female | Posts: 622 | Points: 2,401
happygoluckyelf


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from TheOtherHorseman at 12:15 am on Feb. 22, 2007

Are we to completely abandon the pursuit of knowledge out of terror over what horrors might be born from it?  Furthermore, are we to pretend that we have PhD's in genetics that enable us to talk on the consequences of the practical uses of such knowledge as if we are authorities?

No we should not completely abandon the pursuit of knowledge out of fear, but we should not assume that just because something CAN be used for good that it WILL be. I don't think it's necessary to have a PhD in genetics to speculate about possible consequence, some of it is just common sense. I mean you have to look at both sides of a story. Now, I know my opinion on this subject seems pretty extreme, and really I think I'm more moderate than I'm coming across, but from what I was reading the main argument against genetic engineering was "It's Playing God," and while I do kind of agree with that I just wanted to offer up more solid reasons why this might not be a good thing. I suppose the ultimate question is: How would this technology be regulated so that it could be used for good? A question that needs to be asked of all new techniquest that seem to be on everyone's thoughts, like stem cell research, but that's another topic entirely.

-------
"Nothing endures but change"


9:23 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: Feb. 2006 | Days Active: 111
Join to learn more about happygoluckyelf Michigan, United States | Straight Female | Posts: 521 | Points: 1,700
Seafercat

Guru

Patron
Reply
Quote: from Vintorez at 6:08 pm on Feb. 22, 2007

You're an idiot, I never told anybody to do anything, I simply SHARED my OPINION, and I didn't force my opinion on you or anybody else. I hate when idiots try and make situations into something their not.

I said how is it your right to decide who and who doesn't "play god"?
You replied with "it's not man's place", you didn't answer my question, you basically claimed it was your right to tell man that it's not his right.


We were put on the Earth to SERVE God. That's a fact.  And last time I checked, as servants, we don't try to overtake God's throne.

Last time I checked, that hadn't be proven and therefore was not fact.


10:09 pm on Feb. 21, 2007 | Joined: April 2006 | Days Active: 718
Join to learn more about Seafercat Luxembourg | Female | Posts: 17,347 | Points: 24,448
akallen


de novo

Sustainer
Support Leader
Tech Support Leader
Reply
Thats stupid... really people should be the way they turn out, nothing more or less

5:35 am on Feb. 22, 2007 | Joined: Aug. 2006 | Days Active: 752
Join to learn more about akallen Florida, United States | Bisexual Male | Posts: 34,312 | Points: 30,392
JuicyGal17


Enlightened One
Reply
I can see how it would be considered "Playing God", but as TheOtherHorseman pointed out, other medical advances which we now generally consider to be normal, could also be seen in that way. On the whole I would say that I don't oppose to it if it prevents children from having health problems that will endanger/impair their lives. On the other hand the concept of determining their physical appearance is just freakish and dull.

5:43 am on Feb. 22, 2007 | Joined: May 2005 | Days Active: 848
Join to learn more about JuicyGal17 England, United Kingdom | GLBT Ally Female | Posts: 7,126 | Points: 16,081
obvious child


Guru

Ad Free
Reply
Haven't any of you wankers watched Gattca?

designer babies allows for genetic determinism. It is the ultimate anti-thesis of equal opportunity.

The ONLY tinkering we should be doing is to remove the most painful and horrible hereditary diseases. And even then it is questionable as those genes may in the future interact in ways we cannot forsee to stop a contagious disease.

-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo


4:22 pm on Feb. 27, 2007 | Joined: Sep. 2005 | Days Active: 946
Join to learn more about obvious child Oregon, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,337 | Points: 24,821
Apotheosis



Patron
Reply
Just make it really expensive. Then, for the first time in history, the ruling elite of the planet is guaranteed to be both handsome and intelligent, as the masses get more retarded in comparison. An engineered meritocracy.

4:52 pm on Feb. 27, 2007 | Joined: Aug. 2004 | Days Active: 1,014
Join to learn more about Apotheosis Venezuela | Posts: 20,582 | Points: 33,185
obvious child


Guru

Ad Free
Reply
Quote: from Apotheosis at 2:52 pm on Feb. 27, 2007

Just make it really expensive. Then, for the first time in history, the ruling elite of the planet is guaranteed to be both handsome and intelligent, as the masses get more retarded in comparison. An engineered meritocracy.

That doesn't ensure a meritocracy, that's aristocracy, which in history has been shown to be the cause of many bad decisions.

What makes you think the rich are the best to rule? The US is a plutocracy and we have so many problems, many caused by our leaders.



-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo


4:56 pm on Feb. 27, 2007 | Joined: Sep. 2005 | Days Active: 946
Join to learn more about obvious child Oregon, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,337 | Points: 24,821
Pages: 1 2 3  Next » Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / Science & Business / Viewing Topic