http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/16
The most significant part of this study is figure 1:
"Figure 1 summarizes the biological processes that are enriched with higher FST SNPs with a significant P value of 10-10 or lower (see Method), and their λ values, with λ being the ratio of the proportion of higher FST SNPs (≥0.6) in the analyzed category to the proportion of higher FST SNPs in genome-wide genes (which is 0.0049). The categories listed in Figure 1 include a large number involved with organ development, such as those involved in pancreas, lung, and heart development."
FST = Fixation index, a measure of population differentiation
SNP = Single-nucleotide polymorphism, a DNA sequence variation

In layman's terms, the longer the bar, the more differentiation between populations - the shorter the bar, the less differentiation between populations on the trait. Here's figure 1:

http://biomedcentral.com/content/figures/1471-2148-11-16-1-l.jpg

Pigmentation is roughly in the middle, which refers to skin color, which is what egalitarians/liberals generally define race as. However, above pigmentation are the more significant and relevant traits that correspond to racial groups. I'll list some significant ones:
- Pituitary gland development
- Dorosventral neural tube patterning
- Hindbrain development
- Positive regulation of neuron differentiation
- Developmental growth
- Neuron development

All of these have something to do with growth, behavior, or cognition. In other words, these traits more aptly describe or predict race than "skin color" does. But of course applying one specific trait to race is ridiculous because everyone who has studied anything about race knows that race is a COLLECTION of countless traits, not one single trait like "skin color". But this really puts into question the silly belief that there are no possible racial differences in growth, behavior, or cognition. In fact it should be assumed that there are until proven otherwise, and so far the evidence has suggested that there are significant, measurable, and meaningful differences with these traits.

When will liberals/egalitarians learn?

Post edited at 4:17 pm on Aug. 11, 2012 by kidd rune

-------
"The Jewish problem is one of the greatest problems in the world, and
no man, be he writer, politician or diplomatist, can be considered mature
until he has striven to face it squarely on its merits." - HW Steed

so if you're using this to argue that blacks are a different species or subspecies then it's fucking pointless because you might as well say northern europeans are different from asians.

---

differences in SNPs are observed between different populations in general. for example there are mutations with higher prevalence in scandinavian people than in eastern europeans.

---

---

so if you're using this to argue that blacks are a different species or subspecies then it's fucking pointless because you might as well say northern europeans are different from asians.

---

---

Also Northern Euros are different from Asians, what's your point?

---

---

---

Also Northern Euros are different from Asians, what's your point?

---

that was my point, that they're different. this is not new radical evidence, there have ALWAYS been these sorts of genetic and hereditary differences in people of different origin. it doesn't make them a difference species.

---

---

KR, are you always looking to argue with people?

---

---

Quote: from Run with the wolves at 7:44 pm on Aug. 11, 2012

---

KR, are you always looking to argue with people?

---

No, it'd be much simpler if people looked at the facts and evidence I present and accept that I have the truth in most cases, but since I almost always talk about controversial and emotionally-loaded subjects it's eminent.

---

Quote: from kidd rune at 5:23 pm on Aug. 11, 2012

---

Quote: from polio at 7:37 pm on Aug. 11, 2012

---

---

Also Northern Euros are different from Asians, what's your point?

---

that was my point, that they're different. this is not new radical evidence, there have ALWAYS been these sorts of genetic and hereditary differences in people of different origin. it doesn't make them a difference species.

---

Where the hell are you getting this different species idea from? I didn't say anything about separate species in this thread... it is rational to consider two different populations into different species. I'm wondering why you consider Whites and Blacks the same species...

---

You just contradicted yourself.

You are arguing that they aren't the same species.

Homo sapiens are homo sapiens regardless of ethnicity, origin, etc.

---

i'm confused are you people arguing about if black and white people have more in common with apes than each other

---

---

Quote: from h8meiwld at 1:43 am on Aug. 12, 2012

---

i'm confused are you people arguing about if black and white people have more in common with apes than each other

---

kidd rune is, because a racist bigot like himself is eager to prove that black people are worth less than white people.

---

what the.... how did you get THAT from this thread?

-------
I'd rather  be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not.

---

Quote: from polio at 5:55 pm on Aug. 11, 2012

---

Quote: from h8meiwld at 1:43 am on Aug. 12, 2012

---

i'm confused are you people arguing about if black and white people have more in common with apes than each other

---

kidd rune is, because a racist bigot like himself is eager to prove that black people are worth less than white people.

---

 

what the.... how did you get THAT from this thread?

---

Not just from this thread. By looking at every other post KR has made.

Post edited at 6:04 pm on Aug. 11, 2012 by Run with the wolves