|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
I've changed my mind. |
| Genetic completeness constitutes life. |
|
|
|
Replies: 32 Last Post April 18, 2006 10:38pm by Alex9999
|
|
|
|
|
Web Resources: Teen Pregnancy Facts, Abortion Facts
USA Youth Crisis Hotline: 1-800-448-4663
|
|
|
abspwnsyou
Dairy Product Addict
Ad Free
|
Yeah I know because dead bodies are carring on so many biological functions and fit so many of the definations of life. Almost as many as dead hair cells do.
------- ¡Vive la República de Tejas! ¡Libertad de los Estados Unidos de América! ¡Recuerden el Liberty y lo que los zionistas le hicieron!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
telomere13
Dairy Product Addict
Patron
Tech Support Leader
|
The problem is that what constitutes life has such a wide range of suggestions and no evidence that trying to base any decision on whether something is "alive" is complete futility. The scope of life ranges from everything -- if our mind is only the interaction of particles, any interaction, including a ball that bounces when it hits the ground, is a response to stimulus -- to only the individual who makes such a statement (after all, it's I think, therefore I am. I can't prove anyone else actually "thinks" and as such I can't prove that they are conscious or "alive"). In the end though, who really cares? There's little debate whether, say, an embryo is alive, because plants and bacteria which are less complex are generally considered "alive," but there's also little debate whether killing plants is morally wrong. So I think life as a state of being is both undefinable and irrelevant. (edit) Argh HTML tags are the devil. (Edited by telomere13 at 10:38 pm on Dec. 19, 2005)
------- http://www.golivewire.com/forums/peer-yatapys-support-a.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skitzkowski
Lawn Care Specialist
|
Descarte did say "I think therefore I am", concluding that it is only possible to know that the "I" exists, and that other things are doubtful, since they are observations through his senses, which in of themselves, are doubtable, but he didn't say he was living, he simply said that he existed. So, if we consider existence the same as living (obviously we must be drawing this conclusion!), then knowledge of existence is integral to living, and then you have a natural fallacy. Betrand Russel tried to explain life as being a response to stimulus. But then it is concievable with ideals, to build a machine that could respond to stimulus. And then you have to define a machine and whether or not the mechanical nature of it is what constitutes it as being a machine, or its process of being constructed, and then figure whether or not that parallels the mechanical nature of a human body and how it is "born". But, running on Descartes example, it falls into naturalistic fallacy. In the case of abortion, or euthanasia for people declared completely void of purposeful brain activity, other than functions for systemic survival, then it would follow that they do not exist because they have no conciousness of there existence. They have no essence before existence, and no life. And then, you're forced to believe something that you know to be wrong, because it does not follow morality. The argument tries to draw on how it should be based solely on information and reasoning and not on fact. And if you believe that life is response to stimulus, then you are on a slippery slope. After questioning man and machine, you'll consider if animals could be classified as being human. Is a person human? Then you run back to the abortion and euthanasia of seriously ill people... because they can't respond to stimulus or think, are they alive? Are they even persons? I would LOVE to see someone actually find a good argument for what life is, without relying on a basic dictionary answer that does nothing to actually solve the moral dilemma.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackadder
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from osmoticdespair at 5:43 pm on Jan. 18, 2006
Quote: from nothingaslucky at 5:40 pm on Jan. 18, 2006
Quote: from quidam at 3:25 am on Jan. 1, 2006
"Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate. Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate. Let the heathen spill theirs on the dusty ground. God shall make them pay for each sperm that can't be found. Every sperm is wanted. Every sperm is good. Every sperm is needed in your neighbourhood." 
Wow this cracked me up. 
its by monty python in case you were unaware... 
I never really got into life of Bryan - Holy grail was a lot better. but regardless- I've always hated that DAMN FUCKING SONG......... But if we must quote Python songs.... Oh, I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay, I sleep all night and I work all day. CHORUS: He's a lumberjack, and he's okay, He sleeps all night and he works all day. I cut down trees, I eat my lunch, I go to the lava-try. On Wednesdays I go shoppin' And have buttered scones for tea. Mounties: He cuts down trees, he eats his lunch, He goes to the lava-try. On Wednesdays 'e goes shoppin' And has buttered scones for tea. CHORUS I cut down trees, I skip and jump, I like to press wild flowers. I put on women's clothing, And hang around in bars. Mounties: He cuts down trees, he skips and jumps, He likes to press wild flowers. He puts on women's clothing And hangs around.... In bars??????? CHORUS I chop down trees, I wear high heels, Suspendies and a bra. I wish I'd been a girlie Just like my dear papa.
------- The truth is what money can be made from a lie.
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|