A MONOGAMOUS RELATIONSHIP IS NOT SLUTTY!!!! -- LiveWire Teen Forums

Quote: from YellowDuckie at 7:10 pm on May 7, 2008

Quote: from Chava at 4:04 pm on May 7, 2008
Quote: from YellowDuckie at 6:59 pm on May 7, 2008
Quote: from Chava at 3:54 pm on May 7, 2008
Quote: from YellowDuckie at 6:50 pm on May 7, 2008
You weren't with him all your life, for one. Two, you're pregnant and underage, being called slutty is your punishment.

For one I said "in my entire life" meaning one guy only not that four years is my entire life, learn to read. For two I'm not underage I'm 19.I got pregnant at 17 and had the baby when I was 18 and a half. I had already graduated high school and everything before I was pregnant. I graduated early at the top of my class NOS perks and everything. So get your facts straight.

Quote: from Chava at 3:48 pm on May 7, 2008
Okay everytime I mention that I got pregnant at 17 with my now fiance and longstanding partner of 4 years people generally call me slutty. How is being with one guy in my entire life being slutty? Had I been four or five years older it wouldn't have been an issure. WTF are these people's problems. Learn the definition of slut if you're going to throw it around so airily.

You have some nerve to come in here and tell some one to get their facts straight when you don't give them. No one gives a SHIT when you graduated. Your high school diploma isn't a higher education that will provide financial stability. The fact is, you got pregnant underage. You obviously lack intelligence if you're running around reproducing.
Learn to communicate, slut.

My nursing degree will be though. I'm in college now. And what is underage? A number that has nothing to do with the ability or maturity to have children and everything to do with a bunch of white men who are out of touch with reality telling us the standards by which we should live our lives. Either that or religion and both are pretty stupid. One refuses to accept change because their ways are the "best" and one refuses to accept change based solely on the theory that there is a higher power and it's his wish to have marriage before children. I'd say you're the ignorant one to follow such poor examples of intelligence.

Okay, well, fine then. Children as young as 13, whose brains aren't even fully developed (The part of your brain that makes responsible decision is fully developed at the age of 25.) should just run around having families because "Some white men who are out of touch with reality," are supposedly wrong. You're trying to defend CHILDREN having CHILDREN because you think they're mature enough?
Newsflash, slut, they're not. Nor are they old enough to make enough to support themselves much less another human being. But who am I to say anything, apparently my opinions are based on some religion or the word of some "higher power," Hell if I should have a thought of my own. Mind you, I never said anything about marriage, and I don't know why I would since that's not something I personally believe in. But hey, it's alright, keep putting words in my mouth.
I'm sure your love child will be raised to the best of your poor ability.

We make about $3,000 a month combined. Which is definately above the poverty level for a family of three. And I never said that 13 or 14 year olds should run around having families because they can. I'm saying that there are exceptions to societies beliefs. My family being one of them. We're doing better than most 25 year olds and just because brain development is peak at 25 for some people it's not true for all people. As I said my child lacks nothing. I am as fit a parent as anyone in their 20's or 30's.

-------
I couldn't think of anything else.

908 users online 157335 members 1786 active today Advertise Here