|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
Keltic Fighter
Wealthy Hobo
|
Religion=Sexist, patriarchal, misogynist....
------- If you don't live for something, You will die for nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Nowhere Man
Dairy Product Addict
|
Yep, looked it up on Ocean as well. New that didn't sound right... Quite a senior is a religious position as well, the person who told me that >>.
|
|
|
mama16advice
Advisor
|
well I dont really know...because it does say things about how a man shouldnt do this and do that and how a woman should do this and that...I wouldnt say sexist...I dont know what to call it actually. I never really thought about it.
------- **iiM hiZ m0theR**
|
|
|
Soren Kierkegaard
Visionary
Sustainer
|
Depends on how you're defining Christian doctrine beyond a First-Century author-audience relationship.
------- God creates out of nothing. Wonderful you say. Yes, to be sure, but he does what is still more wonderful: he makes saints out of sinners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( lsd )
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from Prince o palities at 4:59 pm on May 12, 2008
That really depends on what you mean by sexist. I know this is going to send some heat my direction, but if you mean by advocating exclusive roles for men and women then certainly Paul is sexist. If you mean by sexist that he thought of one sex as better than the other, more loved by God, then certainly not. As for exegesis, it simply means to draw out the authorial intent based on knowledge of the social, historical, and literary context. Paul lived in a time where gender roles were very much a reality and his intent was obviously to that end. If someone is telling you that they applied only to that culture, then that isn't exegesis. It's hermeneutics, that is the process of interpreting the meaning and application of a sacred text. They are two completely different fields not to be confused. 
I remember in the past that you said the Church fathers held a consensus of women not speaking in church, but in Cor. 11.5, Paul says that women can actively pray and prophesy during services. Also, what are your views of the active role many women held in the Church in the first century? What about women like Priscilla and Phoebe, how would they to remain silent during sermons when their homes were used for services? There's an excellent book by Bonnie Thurston, "Women in the New Testament." She (and other scholars) believe the passage in Corinthians instructing women to wear a covering while attending service was an interpolation. My view on Paul had also changed after reading her book.
------- Every Post You Make Goes To Charity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|