|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
Web Resources: Drug Myths Dispelled, Drug & Alcohol Information
USA Drug Abuse Hotline: 1-800-662-4357
|
|
|
mcace
Wealthy Hobo
|
"Not true at all. We never "broke" Iraq; we ended the dictatorship (which wasn't ours to end), we essentially fixed them. We should have stopped there. Why put so much effort into rebuilding another country, when portions of ours are in shambles themselves?" Uh... So it's "fixing" if we go into a country and wipe out the only sort of stability it has? It's like some other country coming in, ending democracy, and saying "There you go, your on your own!" I am opposed to gay marriage because of the reason that why do you need to have it official? You can live together, share bills, ect. without being married! Also, if you allow this exception, they will begin fighting for more rights for jobs, which will put straight people at a disadvantage if gays have more rights for jobs... This is just the start of a battle between gays and straights if their is approved gay marriage.
|
9:06 am on June 7, 2006 | Joined July 2005 | 243 Days Active Join to learn more about mcace Ohio, United States | Straight Male | 1772 Posts | 4237 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
Apotheosis
Patron
Support Leader
|
You really should do your research before you go running your mouth! The average American creates 17x more waste than the average citizen of Mexico 
I bet the average Ethiopian produces even LESS waste!
|
|
|
|
|
Micus
Like hell you will
Patron
|
Quote: from mcace at 12:06 pm on June 7, 2006
I am opposed to gay marriage because of the reason that why do you need to have it official? You can live together, share bills, ect. without being married! 
People want to get married because it is a symbol of their love and dedication to each other. To form a social unit, form the foundation for a household, and maybe eventually a family... the same reasons why straight people want to get married. According to your logic, you'll never get married. Why would you need to? There's no real point anyways, right? Just because you don't want to get married, doesn't mean the rest of us don't want to, either. But then again, you do want to get married, don't you? I feel that homosexual couples should get the same rights as heterosexual couples. No more, no less. Right now, they are being denied a fundamental right, and that is to form the moral, legal, and social bond tying together two loving people, regardless of gender.
Also, if you allow this exception, they will begin fighting for more rights for jobs, which will put straight people at a disadvantage if gays have more rights for jobs... 
Care to elaborate? In what way will being married effect job oppourtunities? Last time I checked, being married wasn't a prerequisite for most occupations.
This is just the start of a battle between gays and straights if their is approved gay marriage. 
Only perpetuated by stupid cunts like yourself who can't accept the fact that someone different from them wants equal treatment. Years from now, people are going to look back at this time and be ashamed of people like you. You think you're doing what's best for the community, but you are (unintentionally?) spreading hate. Congrats.
------- Educators destroy your brain, but you don't know, so why care?
|
2:44 pm on June 7, 2006 | Joined Oct. 2004 | 956 Days Active Join to learn more about Micus Connecticut, United States | Gay Male | 14208 Posts | 25661 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
Birdo
Connoisseur
Ad Free
|
Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 6:16 pm on June 6, 2006 Can anyone come up with a real reason to oppose same-sex marriage rights, other than 'it's icky'? Something concrete, with facts behind it, as opposed to hypotheses and hysteria? 
Financial reasons. When people get married/have a civil union, they get some sort of tax reduction, I'm not sure to what extent so if someone else could shed light on the subject it would be appreciated. If the government had to respect the civil-unions of same sex couples, they'd also have to grant them the same tax benefits. If they were granted the same tax benefits, any two people of the same gender that live together could claim each other on their taxes and the states and the coutry would be screwed out of tax dollars that would need to be had from other sources, i.e. an increase in sales/income/property tax. As far as I know, so correct me if I'm wrong, it's not written in any law that states MUST deny these benefits to same-sex civil-unions, but they do so anyways. Marriage in itself is a religious ceremony. Not purely Christian, but other religions marry as well. It's unconstitutional, as it infringes on our freedom of religion, to refuse a couple the ability to carry out the marriage ceremony and things along with it in a religious fashion. (Edited by Birdo at 3:04 am on June 8, 2006) (Edited by Birdo at 3:05 am on June 8, 2006)
------- My pokemon bring all the boys to the yard and I'm like, "You wanna trade cards?" "Damn right! I wanna trade cards! I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"
|
4:00 am on June 8, 2006 | Joined April 2006 | 259 Days Active Join to learn more about Birdo Alaska, United States | Straight Male | 1848 Posts | 6927 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
Caseofbaskets
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from Birdo at 7:00 am on June 8, 2006Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 6:16 pm on June 6, 2006 Can anyone come up with a real reason to oppose same-sex marriage rights, other than 'it's icky'? Something concrete, with facts behind it, as opposed to hypotheses and hysteria? Financial reasons. When people get married/have a civil union, they get some sort of tax reduction, I'm not sure to what extent so if someone else could shed light on the subject it would be appreciated. If the government had to respect the civil-unions of same sex couples, they'd also have to grant them the same tax benefits. If they were granted the same tax benefits, any two people of the same gender that live together could claim each other on their taxes and the states and the coutry would be screwed out of tax dollars that would need to be had from other sources, i.e. an increase in sales/income/property tax. As far as I know, so correct me if I'm wrong, it's not written in any law that states MUST deny these benefits to same-sex civil-unions, but they do so anyways. Marriage in itself is a religious ceremony. Not purely Christian, but other religions marry as well. It's unconstitutional, as it infringes on our freedom of religion, to refuse a couple the ability to carry out the marriage ceremony and things along with it in a religious fashion. (Edited by Birdo at 3:04 am on June 8, 2006) (Edited by Birdo at 3:05 am on June 8, 2006) Interesting point. Here, where the social cons want to turn back the clock and re-ban same-sex marriage, their argument is that civil unions would be fine, so that everyone is treated equally under tax law, succession law, hospital visitation rights, etc. Their main bugaboo is keeping the word "marriage" for straight couples. I didn't realize that the U.S. SSM debate was hung up on financial issues - all the rhetoric against it seems to be faith-based. I see your point re: straight roommates of the same sex claiming themselves to be a couple and thereby cheating on their taxes. I guess the question is - how often do mixed-gender roommates do this? And wouldn't same-sex marriage make it *easier* on the authorities to determine who gets the tax break, rather than harder? And I guess the obvious question is... why should a gay couple pay more taxes than a straight couple? I mean, that's straightforward financial discrimination, and should be a much easier question to answer than the question of who gets to use the word "married".
------- DON'T PM me if you have nothing intelligent to say.
|
|
|
Birdo
Connoisseur
Ad Free
|
Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 5:04 pm on June 8, 2006
Quote: from Birdo at 7:00 am on June 8, 2006Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 6:16 pm on June 6, 2006 Can anyone come up with a real reason to oppose same-sex marriage rights, other than 'it's icky'? Something concrete, with facts behind it, as opposed to hypotheses and hysteria? Financial reasons. When people get married/have a civil union, they get some sort of tax reduction, I'm not sure to what extent so if someone else could shed light on the subject it would be appreciated. If the government had to respect the civil-unions of same sex couples, they'd also have to grant them the same tax benefits. If they were granted the same tax benefits, any two people of the same gender that live together could claim each other on their taxes and the states and the coutry would be screwed out of tax dollars that would need to be had from other sources, i.e. an increase in sales/income/property tax. As far as I know, so correct me if I'm wrong, it's not written in any law that states MUST deny these benefits to same-sex civil-unions, but they do so anyways. Marriage in itself is a religious ceremony. Not purely Christian, but other religions marry as well. It's unconstitutional, as it infringes on our freedom of religion, to refuse a couple the ability to carry out the marriage ceremony and things along with it in a religious fashion. (Edited by Birdo at 3:04 am on June 8, 2006) (Edited by Birdo at 3:05 am on June 8, 2006) Interesting point. Here, where the social cons want to turn back the clock and re-ban same-sex marriage, their argument is that civil unions would be fine, so that everyone is treated equally under tax law, succession law, hospital visitation rights, etc. Their main bugaboo is keeping the word "marriage" for straight couples. I didn't realize that the U.S. SSM debate was hung up on financial issues - all the rhetoric against it seems to be faith-based. I see your point re: straight roommates of the same sex claiming themselves to be a couple and thereby cheating on their taxes. I guess the question is - how often do mixed-gender roommates do this? And wouldn't same-sex marriage make it *easier* on the authorities to determine who gets the tax break, rather than harder? And I guess the obvious question is... why should a gay couple pay more taxes than a straight couple? I mean, that's straightforward financial discrimination, and should be a much easier question to answer than the question of who gets to use the word "married". 
Canditates take it to a religious thing because that's the voter base they think will vote for them. Just because the Bill of Rights said there shouldn't be government in religion, it doesn't restrict religion from being in government. These candidates end up letting their personal religion decide for them what they find moral and immoral. Oddly enough, in the state of Florida, they make you actually sign a document stating that you are having sex with your spouse. In fact the only state that will respect the benefits of same-sex civil-unions, I believe, is Vermont. Quite frankly, I find it incredibly discrimanatory of states to restric tax benefit from ONLY same-sex civil-unions. I think the benefits should be given based on financial need, not the gender of the couple in question. And even if they do decide to deny benefits by those means, to a same-sex couple, they should at least still allow them the ability to get married within whatever religion they happen to be. A lot of people don't realize that civil-unions and marriages are different things, including those that run our country.
------- My pokemon bring all the boys to the yard and I'm like, "You wanna trade cards?" "Damn right! I wanna trade cards! I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"
|
11:58 pm on June 8, 2006 | Joined April 2006 | 259 Days Active Join to learn more about Birdo Alaska, United States | Straight Male | 1848 Posts | 6927 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whyteguysrock143
Connoisseur
Patron
|
Gas prices? Are you HONESTLY blaming this on Bush? It is not his fault, and he really can't do anything about it either. Ok, if you feel so bad for the homeless or unemployed, why don't you take some affirmative action and do something about it? I'm sure someone quite as intelligent (/sarcasm) as yourself could think of something. Besides, most homeless/unemployed people have done previous things that have put them to be in the situation they're in. Like someone else said, drugs have been around for years. There isn't anything you can do about them either. The war: He's a president. He is supposed to fight for our country. He's doing the best he can, and if you don't believe it, why don't you think of something better, more logical, and propose it to the nation and see how it slides over. Health care: Baby we have the best health care in the world, besides a few other places like Canada, so I suggest you better be thanking your lucky stars and rethinking your argument. NATURAL resources: NATURAL. Not man-made. NOT man-fixed. Crime: what more can we do? please, tell me. I need to know. Just because Dick Cheney's daughter(s) is a lesbian doesn't mean that Bush should make same sex marriage legal. Thats like saying just because you're white he should make all white people first in line. It isn't hypocritical. The VP doesn't have much say in the long run anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|