LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 574 users online 166198 members 2358 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Video | Dictionary | News | FAQ
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
6 online / 34 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic

Bush's proposed gay marriage ban
Replies: 43Last Post Aug. 6, 2006 5:58pm by MisterAndy
Pages: 1 2 3  Next » Email Print Favorite
Web Resources: Drug Myths Dispelled, Drug & Alcohol Information
USA Drug Abuse Hotline: 1-800-662-4357
radcliffe wannabe


Wealthy Hobo
Reply
If it happens in the US you just know this stupid thing will migrate to other countries. The USA is going crazy and Bush is letting it. Gay couple should be allowed to get married just the same as heterosexual couples. So they have sex a different way, who really cares? Give them the same rights as us!

-------
Why bother? Nobody cares what quote is special to you.

5:52 am on June 7, 2006 | Joined Sep. 2005 | 131 Days Active
Join to learn more about radcliffe wannabe England, United Kingdom | Label Free Male | 3065 Posts | 5290 Points
mcace


Wealthy Hobo
Reply
"Not true at all. We never "broke" Iraq; we ended the dictatorship (which wasn't ours to end), we essentially fixed them. We should have stopped there. Why put so much effort into rebuilding another country, when portions of ours are in shambles themselves?"

Uh...  So it's "fixing" if we go into a country and wipe out the only sort of stability it has?  It's like some other country coming in, ending democracy, and saying "There you go, your on your own!"

I am opposed to gay marriage because of the reason that why do you need to have it official?  You can live together, share bills, ect. without being married!  Also, if you allow this exception, they will begin fighting for more rights for jobs, which will put straight people at a disadvantage if gays have more rights for jobs... This is just the start of a battle between gays and straights if their is approved gay marriage.


9:06 am on June 7, 2006 | Joined July 2005 | 243 Days Active
Join to learn more about mcace Ohio, United States | Straight Male | 1772 Posts | 4237 Points
Apotheosis



Patron
Support Leader
Reply

You really should do your research before you go running your mouth! The average American creates 17x more waste than the average citizen of Mexico
I bet the average Ethiopian produces even LESS waste!

12:53 pm on June 7, 2006 | Joined Aug. 2004 | 982 Days Active
Join to learn more about Apotheosis Venezuela | 20342 Posts | 32528 Points
Three Marleans


Soothsayer

Patron
Reply
Quote: from pan at 10:20 pm on June 6, 2006

divorce (correct me if I'm wrong on that, etc.)
Quote: Deuteronomy 24:1

"When a man takes a woman and marries her, if she finds no favor in his eyes, then he shall write her a bill of divorcement and send her out of his house."
Other than that, everything you said in your post was magnificent and well-researched.

(Edited by Three Marleans at 4:30 pm on June 7, 2006)

-------
That time was like never, and like always.
So we go there, where nothing is waiting;
we find everything waiting there.
 
www.myspace.com/penultimatecontempt


2:26 pm on June 7, 2006 | Joined Nov. 2005 | 474 Days Active
Join to learn more about Three Marleans Arkansas, United States | Gay Male | 1856 Posts | 11236 Points
Micus


Like hell you will

Patron
Reply
Quote: from mcace at 12:06 pm on June 7, 2006


I am opposed to gay marriage because of the reason that why do you need to have it official?  You can live together, share bills, ect. without being married!

People want to get married because it is a symbol of their love and dedication to each other. To form a social unit, form the foundation for a household, and maybe eventually a family... the same reasons why straight people want to get married. According to your logic, you'll never get married. Why would you need to? There's no real point anyways, right?

Just because you don't want to get married, doesn't mean the rest of us don't want to, either. But then again, you do want to get married, don't you? I feel that homosexual couples should get the same rights as heterosexual couples. No more, no less. Right now, they are being denied a fundamental right, and that is to form the moral, legal, and social bond tying together two loving people, regardless of gender.



Also, if you allow this exception, they will begin fighting for more rights for jobs, which will put straight people at a disadvantage if gays have more rights for jobs...

Care to elaborate? In what way will being married effect job oppourtunities? Last time I checked, being married wasn't a prerequisite for most occupations.



This is just the start of a battle between gays and straights if their is approved gay marriage.

Only perpetuated by stupid cunts like yourself who can't accept the fact that someone different from them wants equal treatment. Years from now, people are going to look back at this time and be ashamed of people like you. You think you're doing what's best for the community, but you are (unintentionally?) spreading hate. Congrats.

-------
Educators destroy your brain,
but you don't know, so why care?


2:44 pm on June 7, 2006 | Joined Oct. 2004 | 956 Days Active
Join to learn more about Micus Connecticut, United States | Gay Male | 14208 Posts | 25661 Points
Birdo


Connoisseur

Ad Free
Reply

Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 6:16 pm on June 6, 2006
Can anyone come up with a real reason to oppose same-sex marriage rights, other than 'it's icky'?


Something concrete, with facts behind it, as opposed to hypotheses and hysteria?



Financial reasons. When people get married/have a civil union, they get some sort of tax reduction, I'm not sure to what extent so if someone else could shed light on the subject it would be appreciated. If the government had to respect the civil-unions of same sex couples, they'd also have to grant them the same tax benefits. If they were granted the same tax benefits, any two people of the same gender that live together could claim each other on their taxes and the states and the coutry would be screwed out of tax dollars that would need to be had from other sources, i.e. an increase in sales/income/property tax. As far as I know, so correct me if I'm wrong, it's not written in any law that states MUST deny these benefits to same-sex civil-unions, but they do so anyways.

Marriage in itself is a religious ceremony. Not purely Christian, but other religions marry as well. It's unconstitutional, as it infringes on our freedom of religion, to refuse a couple the ability to carry out the marriage ceremony and things along with it in a religious fashion.  

(Edited by Birdo at 3:04 am on June 8, 2006)

(Edited by Birdo at 3:05 am on June 8, 2006)

-------
My pokemon bring all the boys to the yard and I'm like, "You wanna trade cards?"
"Damn right! I wanna trade cards! I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"


4:00 am on June 8, 2006 | Joined April 2006 | 259 Days Active
Join to learn more about Birdo Alaska, United States | Straight Male | 1848 Posts | 6927 Points
Caseofbaskets


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Birdo at 7:00 am on June 8, 2006Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 6:16 pm on June 6, 2006
Can anyone come up with a real reason to oppose same-sex marriage rights, other than 'it's icky'?


Something concrete, with facts behind it, as opposed to hypotheses and hysteria?
Financial reasons. When people get married/have a civil union, they get some sort of tax reduction, I'm not sure to what extent so if someone else could shed light on the subject it would be appreciated. If the government had to respect the civil-unions of same sex couples, they'd also have to grant them the same tax benefits. If they were granted the same tax benefits, any two people of the same gender that live together could claim each other on their taxes and the states and the coutry would be screwed out of tax dollars that would need to be had from other sources, i.e. an increase in sales/income/property tax. As far as I know, so correct me if I'm wrong, it's not written in any law that states MUST deny these benefits to same-sex civil-unions, but they do so anyways.

Marriage in itself is a religious ceremony. Not purely Christian, but other religions marry as well. It's unconstitutional, as it infringes on our freedom of religion, to refuse a couple the ability to carry out the marriage ceremony and things along with it in a religious fashion.  

(Edited by Birdo at 3:04 am on June 8, 2006)

(Edited by Birdo at 3:05 am on June 8, 2006)

Interesting point.  Here, where the social cons want to turn back the clock and re-ban same-sex marriage, their argument is that civil unions would be fine, so that everyone is treated equally under tax law, succession law, hospital visitation rights, etc.  Their main bugaboo is keeping the word "marriage" for straight couples.  I didn't realize that the U.S. SSM debate was hung up on financial issues - all the rhetoric against it seems to be faith-based.

I see your point re: straight roommates of the same sex claiming themselves to be a couple and thereby cheating on their taxes.  I guess the question is - how often do mixed-gender roommates do this?  And wouldn't same-sex marriage make it *easier* on the authorities to determine who gets the tax break, rather than harder?  

And I guess the obvious question is... why should a gay couple pay more taxes than a straight couple?  I mean, that's straightforward financial discrimination, and should be a much easier question to answer than the question of who gets to use the word "married".

-------
DON'T PM me if you have nothing intelligent to say.


6:04 pm on June 8, 2006 | Joined Dec. 2004 | 358 Days Active
Join to learn more about Caseofbaskets Ontario, Canada | Male | 1816 Posts | 5563 Points
Birdo


Connoisseur

Ad Free
Reply
Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 5:04 pm on June 8, 2006

Quote: from Birdo at 7:00 am on June 8, 2006Quote: from Caseofbaskets at 6:16 pm on June 6, 2006  
 Can anyone come up with a real reason to oppose same-sex marriage rights, other than 'it's icky'?  

 
 Something concrete, with facts behind it, as opposed to hypotheses and hysteria?  
 Financial reasons. When people get married/have a civil union, they get some sort of tax reduction, I'm not sure to what extent so if someone else could shed light on the subject it would be appreciated. If the government had to respect the civil-unions of same sex couples, they'd also have to grant them the same tax benefits. If they were granted the same tax benefits, any two people of the same gender that live together could claim each other on their taxes and the states and the coutry would be screwed out of tax dollars that would need to be had from other sources, i.e. an increase in sales/income/property tax. As far as I know, so correct me if I'm wrong, it's not written in any law that states MUST deny these benefits to same-sex civil-unions, but they do so anyways.  

 Marriage in itself is a religious ceremony. Not purely Christian, but other religions marry as well. It's unconstitutional, as it infringes on our freedom of religion, to refuse a couple the ability to carry out the marriage ceremony and things along with it in a religious fashion.    

 (Edited by Birdo at 3:04 am on June 8, 2006)  

(Edited by Birdo at 3:05 am on June 8, 2006)

Interesting point.  Here, where the social cons want to turn back the clock and re-ban same-sex marriage, their argument is that civil unions would be fine, so that everyone is treated equally under tax law, succession law, hospital visitation rights, etc.  Their main bugaboo is keeping the word "marriage" for straight couples.  I didn't realize that the U.S. SSM debate was hung up on financial issues - all the rhetoric against it seems to be faith-based.

I see your point re: straight roommates of the same sex claiming themselves to be a couple and thereby cheating on their taxes.  I guess the question is - how often do mixed-gender roommates do this?  And wouldn't same-sex marriage make it *easier* on the authorities to determine who gets the tax break, rather than harder?    

And I guess the obvious question is... why should a gay couple pay more taxes than a straight couple?  I mean, that's straightforward financial discrimination, and should be a much easier question to answer than the question of who gets to use the word "married".



Canditates take it to a religious thing because that's the voter base they think will vote for them. Just because the Bill of Rights said there shouldn't be government in religion, it doesn't restrict religion from being in government. These candidates end up letting their personal religion decide for them what they find moral and immoral.
Oddly enough, in the state of Florida, they make you actually sign a document stating that you are having sex with your spouse. In fact the only state that will respect the benefits of same-sex civil-unions, I believe, is Vermont.
Quite frankly, I find it incredibly discrimanatory of states to restric tax benefit from ONLY same-sex civil-unions. I think the benefits should be given based on financial need, not the gender of the couple in question. And even if they do decide to deny benefits by those means, to a same-sex couple, they should at least still allow them the ability to get married within whatever religion they happen to be. A lot of people don't realize that civil-unions and marriages are different things, including those that run our country.


-------
My pokemon bring all the boys to the yard and I'm like, "You wanna trade cards?"
"Damn right! I wanna trade cards! I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"

11:58 pm on June 8, 2006 | Joined April 2006 | 259 Days Active
Join to learn more about Birdo Alaska, United States | Straight Male | 1848 Posts | 6927 Points
IamNotBritish


Soothsayer
Reply
Quote: from Sweet N Spicy Gal at 2:17 am on June 6, 2006


Also, consider the fact that Dick Cheney's very own daughter is a lesbian! Can you say hypocritial?

Obviously you can't...

-------
When a man leaves his darkness, he follows the Son.


12:57 am on June 17, 2006 | Joined July 2004 | 381 Days Active
Join to learn more about IamNotBritish Arizona, United States | Male | 7362 Posts | 11820 Points
SadieHawkins


Personal Assistant
Reply
I might have missed it somewhere, but to answer Caseofbaskets' question about the argument against gay marriage: There isn't one really unless you're Christian or something.

I'm a Christian so I'm against gay marriage (but that's a totally different topic), but I think if the government is supposed to be neutral, then what's wrong with gay marriage? Things that atheists/Christians/whatever agree are wrong should get top priority or we're going to have a mess. We can work on converting you guys later. =)

-------
Still watching that proverbial sunrise...


9:26 pm on June 20, 2006 | Joined April 2006 | 11 Days Active
Join to learn more about SadieHawkins United States | Straight Male | 17 Posts | 129 Points
Spirit


Omnipotent One

Patron
Reply
bein gay is da gay lolz i got nothon aganst lesbos tho cos they is hot but man on man aint natural

lolol i think bush shud go away coz no onwe likes him and he try and bomb the little starving kyds.

-------
Dragonfly out in the sun, you know what I mean, don't you know?
Butterflies all out having fun, you know what I mean.


7:56 am on June 21, 2006 | Joined Oct. 2003 | 866 Days Active
Join to learn more about Spirit United States | Asexual Male | 14060 Posts | 19535 Points
ChandraMoon


Quality Control Engineer
Reply
I'm not positive, so feel free to correct me. But I was under the impression that Cheney is pro gay marriage, or at least not against it. Because of his experiences with his daughter and other gay people, he views homosexuality as a human trait, such as hair color, or skin color.

Not that I'm pro Cheney, believe me.

The point is, homosexuality is not a sexual fetish. If you remove sex entirely, it is about who you fall in love with. You an not outlaw it because of religion; if we are to have a fair government, it is to be a logical choice to forbid an entire segment of the population to be married. And I have yet to see one logical argument against it.


8:42 pm on July 9, 2006 | Joined June 2006 | 74 Days Active
Join to learn more about ChandraMoon United States | 108 Posts | 868 Points
whyteguysrock143


Connoisseur

Patron
Reply
Gas prices? Are you HONESTLY blaming this on Bush? It is not his fault, and he really can't do anything about it either.

Ok, if you feel so bad for the homeless or unemployed, why don't you take some affirmative action and do something about it? I'm sure someone quite as intelligent (/sarcasm) as yourself could think of something. Besides, most homeless/unemployed people have done previous things that have put them to be in the situation they're in.

Like someone else said, drugs have been around for years. There isn't anything you can do about them either.

The war: He's a president. He is supposed to fight for our country. He's doing the best he can, and if you don't believe it, why don't you think of something better, more logical, and propose it to the nation and see how it slides over.

Health care: Baby we have the best health care in the world, besides a few other places like Canada, so I suggest you better be thanking your lucky stars and rethinking your argument.

NATURAL resources: NATURAL. Not man-made. NOT man-fixed.

Crime: what more can we do? please, tell me. I need to know.

Just because Dick Cheney's daughter(s) is a lesbian doesn't mean that Bush should make same sex marriage legal. Thats like saying just because you're white he should make all white people first in line. It isn't hypocritical. The VP doesn't have much say in the long run anyways.


1:36 pm on July 13, 2006 | Joined June 2004 | 319 Days Active
Join to learn more about whyteguysrock143 Colorado, United States | Straight | 3009 Posts | 6214 Points
obvious child


Guru

Ad Free
Reply
Quote: from Birdo at 4:00 am on June 8, 2006


Financial reasons.....increase in sales/income/property tax.

What's stopping straight people from doing this as well?

Hint: nothing. It's not a problem with straights, why would it be a problem with gays?


Marriage in itself is a religious ceremony. Not purely Christian, but other religions marry as well. It's unconstitutional, as it infringes on our freedom of religion, to refuse a couple the ability to carry out the marriage ceremony and things along with it in a religious fashion.

Thus the obvious, simplest and best solution would be get gov't completely out of marriage.

-------
"Well this is new....and scary" - Serena on a Convent Scarab


6:16 pm on July 13, 2006 | Joined Sep. 2005 | 764 Days Active
Join to learn more about obvious child Oregon, United States | Straight Male | 12798 Posts | 21513 Points
obvious child


Guru

Ad Free
Reply
Quote: from whyteguysrock143 at 1:36 pm on July 13, 2006

Gas prices? Are you HONESTLY blaming this on Bush? It is not his fault, and he really can't do anything about it either.[/quote

Not entirely correct. Gas prices weren't this high before Bush's little Middle East Adventure. While it isn't his fault for the most part, he does share some of the blame as his actions have seriously unsettled oil traders.  


The war: He's a president. He is supposed to fight for our country. He's doing the best he can, and if you don't believe it, why don't you think of something better, more logical, and propose it to the nation and see how it slides over.

It is amazing how some people forgive massive incompetence.




-------
"Well this is new....and scary" - Serena on a Convent Scarab


6:17 pm on July 13, 2006 | Joined Sep. 2005 | 764 Days Active
Join to learn more about obvious child Oregon, United States | Straight Male | 12798 Posts | 21513 Points
Pages: 1 2 3  Next » Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

Prereq. Intellectual Test
You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic