Argument 1: Men wrote a book about a time thousands of years before time stamp A. Since it is the Bible, it is accepted as evidence.

Argument 2: Men write books about a time bililons of years before time stamp A. Supporters of Argument 1 deem it as such:

---

absolutely no evidence whatsoever

---

... I see.

-------
Educators destroy your brain,
but you don't know, so why care?
Fagotto

That and he can't find a creationist website to plagarize to produce rebuttles. He has no original work anyways.

-------
Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers,
just as long as you say them- Jeffery Sinclair

One possible scripture that disproves evolution is Genesis 1:20-25 where it's stated that "birds" were created before "land animals."

^^That's all offtopic, but seeing as how YankeeFan is off scouring false information from articles produced by people with no scientific credentials, maybe you can help me understand this issue a bit.

-------
"To hell with your courts. I know what justice is." - Jack White

That scripture doesn't disprove evolution. In fact it goes aganist evolution in that birds didn't exist for millions of years after land animals evolved from their amphibian ancestors.  

-------
Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers,
just as long as you say them- Jeffery Sinclair

why note someone religious from where you live?

i dont believe in creation and im from america

-------
"I'm not going to be ground under the wheels of big government!

---

Right, I was mistaken in saying 'disprove.' I agree that the scripture  contradicts the timeline of evolution. This also contradicts theistic evolution. Seeing as how literal creation is laughable at best, I once though I could reconcile God with evolution such as some Christians do. I see how this is now impossible unless I was a complete idiot.

---

Theistic evolution doesn't view genesis as literal. It's a story to explain the world to ignorant, nomadic jews. I don't see a problem if you take the bible as a metaphor in reconciling it with science in general.

-------
Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers,
just as long as you say them- Jeffery Sinclair

---

Quote: from seawolf at 4:29 pm on Oct. 15, 2006

---

Right, I was mistaken in saying 'disprove.' I agree that the scripture  contradicts the timeline of evolution. This also contradicts theistic evolution. Seeing as how literal creation is laughable at best, I once though I could reconcile God with evolution such as some Christians do. I see how this is now impossible unless I was a complete idiot.

---

Theistic evolution doesn't view genesis as literal. It's a story to explain the world to ignorant, nomadic jews.

---

---

I don't see a problem if you take the bible as a metaphor in reconciling it with science in general.

---

And it's not a problem that Genesis 1:20-15 contradicts the timeline evolution? I think even a non-literal, metaphorical "interpretation" of this passage makes it difficult for theistic evolution to exist.

-------
"To hell with your courts. I know what justice is." - Jack White

---

lol ok,nice
*holds beer & popcorn*
so whose winning?

---

There isn't any winning. You can't decide the victor when one side refuses to post. Besides, given how weak yank is in everything there's no much a question anyways in the general context of life.

-------
Maybe God doesn't care how you say your prayers,
just as long as you say them- Jeffery Sinclair