|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
The topic to (nearly) prove.... |
| ...that alien spacecraft have been visiting Earth. |
|
|
|
|
Replies: 41 Last Post Oct. 24, 2006 12:48am by noggin
|
|
|
|
|
Web Resources: Drug Myths Dispelled, Drug & Alcohol Information
USA Drug Abuse Hotline: 1-800-662-4357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( DoomMaker )
Omnipotent One
Patron
|
You're still wrong. These objects strongly resembled spacecraft, according to famous astronauts, who would not say so unless they were pretty sure. I am sure that if it had been 'space junk' there would never be a big argument about a coverup. Also, the radar example. Plus the example I gave up Edmund Halley, and the testimony of another famous scientist, Werner Von Braun. People like that (rocketeers and famous astronauts) do not spill shit out of their mouth without near certainty of what they are saying. Check out the links for yourself. Persons affilliated with NASA, the CIA, and more would not be coming forward to try to expose a supposed conspiracy if it was all space junk, as you say. It would be fairly easy to discern an astroid from a metallic spacecraft on radar, as there would be quite an heavy impact (few of these sightings were in space compared to on the ground). You might have skimmed my post, but you clearly missed a lot of it, and are dismissing it as blabber because you have probably never really seen reliable testimony from people who have everything to lose by spreading misinformation (whether intentionally or unintentionally), so you are pissing away my post without properly refuting the evidence. Either view the links, and read the entire post (As I previously stated, it is clear that you did not, because you missed out on many examples that do not apply to your little idea), or I will ignore you, just as I did blackadder. Your holier-than-thou mindset of that "since there is a lot of bullshit floating around this area, all of it must be nonsense" prevents you from actually forming an intelligent opinion on the issue I have presented. So, if you do not get your act together, I will take the advice of your signiature, and ignore you. Pissing away my post without actually refuting the evidence is disrespectful, and retarded.
------- In Soviet Russia, anti christ bans moderators! Last.fm
|
|
|
FishyCrossing
Wealthy Hobo
|
I'm gonna have to say, if aliens landed tommorow, even to say that they were starting a nuclear war with our planet-it would make my day. I would easily stowaway on those ships...o my god how cool would that be...
|
|
|
( DoomMaker )
Omnipotent One
Patron
|
Quote: from FishyCrossing at 11:39 pm on Sep. 3, 2006
I'm gonna have to say, if aliens landed tommorow, even to say that they were starting a nuclear war with our planet-it would make my day. I would easily stowaway on those ships...o my god how cool would that be... 
Do you actually have something to say about the topic and the links though?
------- In Soviet Russia, anti christ bans moderators! Last.fm
|
|
|
|
|
Stormblazer
Visionary
|
I agree it's perfectly possible for aliens to exist- that's not the problem here. 1) Anything beyond our knowledge and understanding, especially at this level, must be assumed to be outside the realm of human concepts as well. That means purpose could be something we have no concept of. But, in practicality, I can't think of any reason they'd want to show themselves in the ways you've mentioned. If they were obvserving, I think it's fair to say they'd want to do so WITHOUT notice. If they had the technology to reach us, then certainly they'd have the technology to hide themselves. 2) Any notions of what spacecraft might look like are influenced by our own knowlege, and in particular sci-fi. Any ship advanced enough to reach us for non-colonization purposes has zero contraints on what it would look like, so saying they "looked like spaceships" actually FAVORS my position- because that means it's more likely to be fake. Fake doesn't neccesarily mean that someone purposely faked it, it can also mean that someone saw something and misinterpreted what they saw. Hardly an unusual occurence, and all the more likely in an unfamiliar environment. 3) Once again, UFO = Unidentified Flying Object, NOT alien spacecraft (assuming such a thing is the means of travel that would be used by such). Overall, your OWN arguments actually argue against your position.
------- Religion: Apathetic agnostic Political Affiliation: Independent
|
|
|
( DoomMaker )
Omnipotent One
Patron
|
Actually, they do not. You are presenting finer details, and the fine details cannot be taken to any degree of certainty on either side. Perhaps just some sci fi 'UFO's' have a bit of basis on sightings? The zero constraint idea is true, as are the constraints for the formation of life, to a certain degree. The different the makeup of a race's home planet, and the home planet's history, the greater difference in their makeup from ours. Therefore, if the planet is somewhat similar to Earth, depending on the circumstances, the race may have some similarities to humans, as well as spacecraft that actually resemble some sort of transport module. I guess one would have to take into account advanced genetic modifcation, too. Just because some sightings are indeed fake, does not mean that the bulk of them are. I also do not tend to think that reliable persons go up and testify about what they saw- especially when they subject is ridiculed, if they believed that there was even a ghost of a chance that it was space junk, or something. My argument does not favor your position, because I am not looking into the finest details. I mean, I could offer a variety of reasons why they do not cloak their ships, but they could be right or wrong. First, their propulsion systems emit raditation, which is impossible to mask because it can propel the craft to an ultra high speed. Second, because it is not a big deal, as they do not intend to make themselves explicitly known (as it seems), and they are in no danger of being shot down. Again, this is not an argument, these are just a few examples that I have put down, just as you have. Just because everything that I have explained is not 'completely unimaginable" does not mean it is fake, at all. It means that it is likely that whatever race uses these vehicles has some similarities to ours. You had something to say that did not contain copious amount of stupidity, so I responded this time. To everyone, I apologize for getting to this so late, I have been quite busy. More posts about the evidence and the post in general would be greatly appreciated.
------- In Soviet Russia, anti christ bans moderators! Last.fm
|
|
|
blackraven1614
Wealthy Hobo
|
Really people are ignorant to say that we're the only life forms in the universe. There are so many galaxies. Its pretty dumb to say thats there's no other form of life in other galaxies. Why would we be the only ones alive? Its just not possible. Stop ignoring the facts, the evidence is all around us. People just like to ignore it, because they don't think it can be possible, when it is. Open your eyes is all I have to say.
------- The Dead Shine All Night Long.
|
|
|
|
|
( DoomMaker )
Omnipotent One
Patron
|
I'm referring to the sightings by famous people, and reliable sources. You were referring to a specific implication of technology. These people are not assuming it to be of extraterrestrial nature, they are pretty much sure, or else they would not come forward. I will agree with you, that many people who are on drugs, or just see things, and assume it to be an alien spacecraft are wrong, but this does not make for a case.
------- In Soviet Russia, anti christ bans moderators! Last.fm
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|