LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 643 users online 221722 members 1572 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
Ryans a Ninja
You tell me that my problem is thinking But I can ch...
Mood: Euphoric
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
4 online / 43 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic

Mentally disabled people
Should they be euthanized?
Replies: 30Last Post Nov. 6, 2006 7:08am by LinZ
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 3 Email Print Favorite
Web Resources: Teen Pregnancy Facts, Abortion Facts
USA Youth Crisis Hotline: 1-800-448-4663
( LinZ )


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Here's something somewhat in support of the question originally posed in this topic:


LONDON -- A leading British medical college has called on the health profession to consider euthanasia for seriously disabled newborns.
   The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology has said that "active euthanasia" should be considered to spare parents the emotional and financial burdens of bringing up such children.
   "A very disabled child can mean a disabled family," it says in a formal submission. "If life-shortening and deliberate interventions to kill infants were available, they might have an impact on obstetric decision-making, even preventing some late abortions, as some parents would be more confident about continuing a pregnancy and taking a risk on outcome."
   The call comes in the college's submission to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, which is conducting an inquiry into the ethical issues raised by the policy of prolonging life in newborns.
   The submission states: "We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best-interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management of options available to the sickest of newborns."
   It is not officially calling for the introduction of active euthanasia, but wants it openly debated.
   The proposal has been supported by several leading geneticists and medical ethicists.
   Joy Delhanty, a professor of human genetics at University College London, said: "I think it is morally wrong to strive to keep alive babies that are going to suffer many months or years of ill-health."
   But John Wyatt, a consultant neonatalologist at University College London hospital, called the proposal "social engineering."
   "Once you introduce the possibility of intentional killing into medical practice, you change the fundamental nature of medicine," he said.

But of course, these parents must be unbelievably selfish for not wanting to care for their precious little miracles, even if they are extraordinarily fucked up. Heaven forbid one be so self-centered as to think of their own life. The sickest of people is who this topic applies to, not people who have mild Asperger's or autistic tendancies (although there are probably some parents who wish they could put their autistic brats down occasionally).

-------
I value the lives of slugs over the lives of children - and I pour salt on slugs.


7:08 am on Nov. 6, 2006 | Joined: Sep. 2005 | Days Active: 288
Join to learn more about LinZ Pennsylvania, United States | Straight Female | Posts: 1,457 | Points: 4,387
Pages: 1 2 3 Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

Prereq. Intellectual Test
You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic