|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
UK Law - Wounding what's the sentence? |
| sentence |
|
|
|
|
Replies: 39 Last Post Feb. 14 12:48pm by bourney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marshmellowman
plz ♻
Sustainer
Support Leader
Tech Support Leader
|
Section 20 of the Act:
20. Inflicting bodily injury, with or without weapon. Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person, either with or without any weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable [...] 34 to be kept in penal servitude [...] 35 
------- Intelligence is the ability to avoid doing work, yet getting the work done. Treasures await...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marshmellowman
plz ♻
Sustainer
Support Leader
Tech Support Leader
|
You will most likely be convicted under Section 20, of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861. Read my quote above for the actual wording. If this was unintentional then the sentence would be: "It is an either way offence, which carries a maximum penalty on indictment of five years' imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. Summarily, the maximum penalty is six months' imprisonment and/or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum." If it was intentional, then you will be convicted under section 18 of the act, which carries a sentence of "It is an indictable only offence, which carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for life." Please note:
-When charging an offence involving grievous bodily harm, consideration should be given to the fact that a section 20 offence requires the infliction of harm, whereas a section 18 offence requires the causing of harm. This may be of some significance when considering alternative verdicts, (section 7 below). However this distinction has been greatly reduced by the decision of the House of Lords in R v Ireland; R v Burstow [1998] A.C 147 (Archbold 19-208). -Factors that may indicate the specific intent include: a repeated or planned attack; deliberate selection of a weapon or adaptation of an article to cause injury, such as breaking a glass before an attack; making prior threats; using an offensive weapon against, or kicking the victim's head. 
Source- CPS.gov.uk Post edited at 6:05 am on Feb. 9, 2008 by marshmellowman
------- Intelligence is the ability to avoid doing work, yet getting the work done. Treasures await...
|
|
|
( Anonymous )
|
Quote: from Blank black at 1:58 pm on Feb. 9, 2008
Quote: from ImSoHappy at 1:56 pm on Feb. 9, 2008
Your act was assult with a deadly weapon. It's enought to carry a wepaon but to use it is another thing. http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/charges/jury/assault3.htm 
Thats in America. CPS will go for S18, trust me. Knifing to the stomach, possession of a weapon would both go for MW or GBH with intent. 
it wasn't in the stomach, it was the side, and thanks for the help people i'm actually really scared
|
|
|
Blank black
Manui Dat Cognitio Vires
Sustainer
Support Leader
|
Quote: from marshmellowman at 2:02 pm on Feb. 9, 2008
You will most likely be convicted under Section 20, of the Offences Against The Person Act 1861. Read my quote above for the actual wording. If this was unintentional then the sentence would be: "It is an either way offence, which carries a maximum penalty on indictment of five years' imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. Summarily, the maximum penalty is six months' imprisonment and/or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum." If it was intentional, then you will be convicted under section 18 of the act, which carries a sentence of "It is an indictable only offence, which carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for life. Please note:
-When charging an offence involving grievous bodily harm, consideration should be given to the fact that a section 20 offence requires the infliction of harm, whereas a section 18 offence requires the causing of harm. This may be of some significance when considering alternative verdicts, (section 7 below). However this distinction has been greatly reduced by the decision of the House of Lords in R v Ireland; R v Burstow [1998] A.C 147 (Archbold 19-208). -Factors that may indicate the specific intent include: a repeated or planned attack; deliberate selection of a weapon or adaptation of an article to cause injury, such as breaking a glass before an attack; making prior threats; using an offensive weapon against, or kicking the victim's head. 

To know exactly which you'll get, how many times did you stab him? For s18, they need to prove your intent. S20, it is merely enough that you were reckless (in the very taking your knife out of your pocket, that shows intention to cause 'serious harm' (Smith). I can't see why they wouldn't go for 18, you'd have to have a good barrister to get you off it.
------- Emotions are naught to be tormented, for they can kill a person in more ways than one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|