Now id actualy recommend BSD over Linux/GNU Distros, as BSD is easyer for me and well it still runs Linux/GNU programs anyway. As for why i use it? well I do some software programing, I personaly dont trust windows with any important data as I pretty much grew up with *nix; and non microsoft os's... used amigas for quite some time; so windows was never realy a personal favorite for me.
I do think windows assumes alot (*nix doesnt), I dont realy like that.. I want to say; heres a video card that i just put in.. let me set it to my exact settings, and not have windows assume im useing a monitor that can take 800x600.. if im running it on a tv thats going to look best in 320x240. So yeah, thats pretty much why i use BSD.. linux can do the same stuff ofcourse, i just never found linux to be easy as people say.

-------
[url]http://andrevicky.vze.com[/url]

People always just say Linux as the operating system; I still dont realy get why they do that... as if everyone rightaway said, hey.. I use "Mandrake 8.0 [Linux/GNU Distro]" Then you dont get people in chat saying stuff like "Linux 8.0 doesnt exist" (and it doesnt).. or "What Linux/GNU Distro are you using then?"

-------
[url]http://andrevicky.vze.com[/url]

---

I seem to find FreeBSD harder than Redhat (obviously because Redhat easily probes and configurates your hardware automatically, thus there isn't much of a learning curve). I like Linux more as a desktop operating system, but most BSDs are not for desktops. Most BSDs are for servers, for the exception of Mac OS X. Mac OS X, an operating system based off the Mach, I prefer it over Linux simply because there is no learning curve and it offers the power of unix. If freebsd was any easier than mac os x i'd probably use it, otherwise i'd stick with linux.

---

Well you mention no learning curve for OSX and offering the power of unix... well inorder to actualy realy use the unix part, your going to have to learn something. Generaly if your sitting there just using the thing, it doesnt mater that unix runs behind it (and simply using the computer, isnt realy using the power of unix, lol); other than being more stable and in some cases quicker.
As for Redhat probing your hardware, well FreeBSD does the same thing, just not as graphical as Redhat.. when you install Redhat itll in a gui ask what you want done. With FreeBSD after the os is installed, and while still in /stand/sysinstall you can configure most anything; but you dont have a mouse to do it with (other than configuring X server, witch does have a gui setup)
----

---

Well it is an Operating system thought isnt it!

---

Well no, if you just take the linux kernel and slap it on a computer, theres no way thats going to do you any good.. as you cant just boot the kernel itself and bring up a terminal or gui.

-------
[url]http://andrevicky.vze.com[/url]

As far as your distro is concerned, that's up to you.  Generally if you play around with the linuxes as much as I have you tend to find that some are more restrictive than others (Red Hat for instance and their RPM package management formats can make things VERY restrictive).  

And on the BSD vs Linux thing, FreeBSD makes a great server, but not as good as a desktop OS.  I noticed when running X on FreeBSD it was consistantly using 10% of my processor for no apparent reason, and linux doesn't do that.  Mabye there was a misconfiguration but I thought that was unacceptable.  

---

?

---

Because you'll be 1337 if you do.  And you'll get to be a part of the community.  (Of pasty white nerds living in their parents' garages).  And you'll get to be "cool" and replace the S in Microsoft with a dollar sign.  Because you're "cool."  And Micro$oft obviously isn't.

I'm sorry.  Well, back to Slashdot I go. :D

-------
Purple squirrels on bicycles are cool.

I admin 50 linux machines.  

-------

root@xeon [~]# pico lilo.conf