LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 355 users online 221644 members 309 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
Casey Burns
I haven't filled out my profile...
Mood: Relaxed
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
2 online / 26 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic

what will obama do if Israel attacks Iran
Replies: 43Last Post July 3, 2008 3:22pm by GodsFireAngel
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 3 Email Print Favorite
Choice Votes Percent  
Will he just sit back and watch? 13 36%
Will he attack Israel for being the agressors? 2 5%
Will he send our troops to support our ally Israel? 10 27%
who cares as long as i can get some dicks in my mouth 11 30%
Vote Now! 36 Votes Cast
GodsFireAngel


Soothsayer
Reply
Israel wouldn't launch an all out war with Iran. It would try to hit the sites that are working on nuclear weapons. Think Osirak and recent Syria strike, which didn't result in a war.
Neither Russia or China would be stupid enough to help Iran. Same with India. The Arab nations also don't really want to see a nuclear Iran, so besides Syria there would be no entrants into a conflict there. Even Syria might stay out of it depending on how talks are going with Israel.
The heart of a conflict would be naval, air and missile warfare. The US and other such nations would stop the Iranian Navy from deploying into the ocean. The US would continue helping Israel with anti-missile technology to defend itself from missile attacks on population centers. In Air combat Israel has much better technology and better trained pilots especially for long distance missions.
I think Iran would be very angry, but wouldn't start attacking US and other Western interests in the middle east, because that really would lead to a full strike on Iran. I think in the same way the US would stay out of any combat of the types mentioned before.
Sure Iran will use its proxies, such as Hamas and hizbullah, but that will be a very local conflict. Syria may or may not get involved, but that will also be very regional.
If unconventional warfare is used however, all bets are off, and we will really see a global scale conflict, but I think that is unlikely

-------
[---}

5:37 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: April 2004 | Days Active: 272
Join to learn more about GodsFireAngel Italy | Straight Female | Posts: 7,915 | Points: 10,908
LiveWire Humor
iinsurgent


Soothsayer

Ad Free
Reply
Why can't we just talk it out?

-------
finnaly i throw my toung into your throught

5:39 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: May 2008 | Days Active: 225
Join to learn more about iinsurgent Azerbaijan | Metrosexual Female | Posts: 8,205 | Points: 11,436
Elm


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from iinsurgent at 5:39 am on July 2, 2008

Why can't we just talk it out?

Because there are bad men in the world who don't care if you talk because the only thing they understand is the barrel of a gun and the only reason you are safe and sound is because other good men are willing to talk to those bad men in the only language they understand - with barrels of guns themselves.


8:30 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: Dec. 2006 | Days Active: 401
Join to learn more about Elm Pennsylvania, United States | Posts: 8,156 | Points: 12,402
nigeltheoutlaw


Connoisseur
Reply
Quote: from Assaultrifle at 12:27 am on July 2, 2008

Just looked up SCO.

Yeah i doubt those nations will directly help Iran with troops and such, they will probably just provide money and aid. But even if they do, whatever, we'll still be able to destroy the nuclear facilities of Iran before they can respond effectively.  

Besides i think WW3 is pretty much inevitable anyway.


Get it through your skull. We do not have enough resources for another large scale war, especially since Iran will have the backing of multiple countries. Plus they will have money, troops, and supplies. We have none of that.

-------
My life is going pretty sweet right now.


10:13 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: Feb. 2008 | Days Active: 150
Join to learn more about nigeltheoutlaw California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 6,226 | Points: 7,947
iinsurgent


Soothsayer

Ad Free
Reply
Quote: from Elm at 8:30 am on July 2, 2008

Quote: from iinsurgent at 5:39 am on July 2, 2008

Why can't we just talk it out?

Because there are bad men in the world who don't care if you talk because the only thing they understand is the barrel of a gun and the only reason you are safe and sound is because other good men are willing to talk to those bad men in the only language they understand - with barrels of guns themselves.


I don't like this story anymore.

-------
finnaly i throw my toung into your throught

10:22 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: May 2008 | Days Active: 225
Join to learn more about iinsurgent Azerbaijan | Metrosexual Female | Posts: 8,205 | Points: 11,436
nigeltheoutlaw


Connoisseur
Reply
Quote: from Assaultrifle at 9:25 pm on July 1, 2008

Please read this entire post.  We must go to war with Iran and destroy their nuclear facilities very soon. Even if you are a hardcore pacifist read all of this and THEN make a decision. Do not be ignorant and oppose this war just because it is a war without even knowing the reasons for it. This is urgent and not a joke. People need to wake up before Iran blows up israel and possbily hits the U.S, killing and maiming millions. I found an article on iranwatch.org that specifies what Iran has built so far and when. It is quoted below.  


 
"International interest in Iran was heightened dramatically in the summer of 2002, when the existence of two nuclear sites was revealed by an exiled Iranian resistance group.[1] Within a year, the world realized that Iran had built or was building everything needed to produce enriched uranium, which could fuel nuclear weapons as well as nuclear reactors. The sites included a uranium mine at Saghand, a yellow cake production plant near Ardakan, a pilot uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, and a commercial-scale enrichment facility on the same site. In addition, Iran was continuing work on a 1,000 megawatt nuclear reactor at Bushehr and was building a heavy water production plant at Arak, next to which Iran planned to build a 40 megawatt heavy water reactor. Beginning in March 2003, following revelations that Iran had concealed nuclear work from the IAEA, the Agency has been investigating Iran's nuclear history. "

 


LINK TO ABOVE ARTICLE:
http://www.iranwatch.org/wmd/wmd-nuclearessay-footnotes.htm  

So Iran has already built or is currently building EVERYTHING necessary to construct a nuclear weapon. And they hid TWO nuclear facilities from the IAEA. (A nuclear watch organization) .  

LINK TO A PIC OF NATANZ, ONE OF IRAN'S NUCLEAR FACILITIES:  
http://www.iranwatch.org/images/EndUser/Natanz-092002.jpg  


Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad declares that his country is only making a nuclear power plant. If so, then why has he openly called for the eradication of Israel off the map at a conference?

LINK TO ARTICLE ABOUT CONFERENCE: http://english.aljazeera.net/English/archive/archive?ArchiveId=15816  


 
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has openly called for Israel to be wiped off the map.  
 
Ahmadinejad addressed students at a conference
 
"The establishment of the Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world," the president told a conference in Tehran on Wednesday, entitled The World without Zionism.

"The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of a war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land," he said.

"As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map," said Ahmadinejad, referring to Iran's revolutionary leader Ayat Allah Khomeini.

His comments were the first time in years that such a high-ranking Iranian official has called for Israel's eradication, even though such slogans are still regularly used at government  
rallies. "  


 


As you see, he has openly declared that Israel should be wiped off the map. In addition ahmadinejad has declared that he wants the entire world to be controlled by islamic theocracy government. He has also declared that his country is not afraid of the U.S. or the U.N. and that his country will not back down. This info is from a book titled "The Iran Threat." The book was written by an Iranian man who moved to the U.S and is opposed to Ahmadinejad's regime.  

In addition, Iran could gain the capability to strike the United States if the nation purchases long range missles from Russia. There is evidence of Russia making many arms deals with Iran recently, selling them tanks and rifles and other things. And there is also evidence that Iran takes these weapons and gives some of them to Hezbollah, an anti israeli terrorist organization consisting of millions of militants which Iran helped create and heavily supports. This shows they could easily purchase missles from Russia if they wanted to.  

The following is a quote from an article about Iran and Russian arms deals. In the article is a quote from the leader of Hezbollah, and in the quote he admits that Iran fully backs Hezbollah and often gives them weapons. (which they acquired from Russia.)  


 
"Hezbollah head Hassan Nasrallah has said it is no secret that Iran is aiding Hezbollah by sending money and weapons via Syria.

In remarks published in an interview in the weekend issue of the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Rai Al-Aam, Nasrallah also is willing to receive aid not only from Iran but also from Muslim countries that have diplomatic ties with Israel, such as Egypt, and states that are considered moderate, such as Saudi Arabia.


 

LINK TO ABOVE ARTICLE: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/821548.html  

The following is a quote from an article detailing the sale of Anti Aricraft Missiles by Russia to Iran. They have sold Iran much more than AA missles but there would be too many articles to link.  


 
"We've signed a contract for supplying [Iran] with air-defense missile systems for defense purposes," Dmitriyev said"  

 

LINK TO ABOVE ARTICLE: http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/02/F1477C44-4533-4436-B19D-1948ED806CE2.html  

So to sum it all up, Iran has ALL the means to create nuclear technology. It has attempted to keep nuclear facilities hidden from the U.N. Iran's aggressive support of a violent anti israeli terrorist organization and their president's need to wipe israel off the map shows they are very, very hostile to israel and very aggressive and would not hesitate to use a nuke on it if they had one.  

And the fact that Iran has made many arms deals with Russia in the past shows they could easily purchase missles that could be equipped with  nuclear warheads that could strike the U.S and other nations.  

I say we don't wait until Iran is done with their nuke and see what happens. I say we attack them now.


I slogged through all of your stuff, and am now sufficiently prepared to refute it.

I looked at your iranwatch site. It is very biased and provides almost NO links to the original works that it sites. It only links to itself.

I seem to remember pictures like this coming from Iraq when people like you so adamantly said that war with Iraq was necessary because they had "nuclear facilities" like this one.

A president can openly say his prejudices against Israel. That DOES NOT mean that he has nukes and wants to use them against Israel. There is absolutely no connection. Your quoted part of the conference has nothing to do with nuclear capabilities, only that the Iranian president dislikes Israel.

You say the Iranian president wishes for a global Islamic theocracy. Provide links or you could just be pulling it out of your a**.

You say Iran is supporting Hezbollah. Your condemning them for what we do all the time; we aid terrorist organizations that are against our enemy.

Russia is trading with Iran in the form of DEFENSIVE missile systems? That doesn't seem odd, considering Israel has a more advanced air force than them and the fact that we are on the precipice of attacking them. FYI those missile systems are incapable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

So you have proved nothing. Iran's leader hates Israel, that is about it. Iran is creating nuclear REACTORS that will use their enriched uranium. They are more than smart enough to realize that trying to develop nuclear weapons would end badly for them. You have not swayed me with your biased, unfounded links or your wild exaggerations and extrapolations.

Post edited at 11:16 am on July 2, 2008 by nigeltheoutlaw

-------
My life is going pretty sweet right now.


11:16 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: Feb. 2008 | Days Active: 150
Join to learn more about nigeltheoutlaw California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 6,226 | Points: 7,947
Elm


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from iinsurgent at 10:22 am on July 2, 2008

Quote: from Elm at 8:30 am on July 2, 2008

Quote: from iinsurgent at 5:39 am on July 2, 2008

Why can't we just talk it out?
 

 Because there are bad men in the world who don't care if you talk because the only thing they understand is the barrel of a gun and the only reason you are safe and sound is because other good men are willing to talk to those bad men in the only language they understand - with barrels of guns themselves.


I don't like this story anymore.

It isn't a pleasant story but it is the truth.  In the future perhaps you shouldn't ask questions unless you are ready to hear the answers.


11:19 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: Dec. 2006 | Days Active: 401
Join to learn more about Elm Pennsylvania, United States | Posts: 8,156 | Points: 12,402
The Samsoniteman


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
iinsurgent, currently there is little stopping America from opening up dialogue with the Great Evils apart from their own grandstanding and rhetoric, spouted false dichotomies that have helped tie themselves too close to Israel.

Obama would be in the unfortunate position of having to follow precident irregardless of how we feels in the matter. At the moment his campaign rhetoric has swung to the right as he prepares to engage McCain, McCain hasn't responded with the traditional swing to the left because either he's too politically incompentent or the Reps are in such a state of cancerous infighting that they can't pull together like in the good old days. So ask Obama now and he'll probably bomb bomb bomb Iran but in reality he would probably try and keep links with Israel, help them a little, stay as quiet as possible.

-------
Massive, epic adventure, multi-coloured, multi-layered.
Sort of two/three dimensional Wizard of Oz for the future.


11:50 am on July 2, 2008 | Joined: June 2004 | Days Active: 1,199
Join to learn more about The Samsoniteman England, United Kingdom | Straight Male | Posts: 13,007 | Points: 24,571
( whoisabs )


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
So basically, change we can believe in?

-------
whoisabs i'm not sure
Guess who's back?

12:03 pm on July 2, 2008 | Joined: Nov. 2006 | Days Active: 838
Join to learn more about whoisabs Texas, United States | Male | Posts: 21,520 | Points: 29,302
nigeltheoutlaw


Connoisseur
Reply
Quote: from whoisabs at 12:03 pm on July 2, 2008

So basically, change we can believe in?

I had to laugh at this.

-------
My life is going pretty sweet right now.


3:06 pm on July 2, 2008 | Joined: Feb. 2008 | Days Active: 150
Join to learn more about nigeltheoutlaw California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 6,226 | Points: 7,947
cicerom16


Personal Assistant
Reply
It's a shame that we have to guess.  Obama should say what he would do in these instances.  Voters are supposed to be well-informed.

6:55 am on July 3, 2008 | Joined: Jan. 2008 | Days Active: 9
Join to learn more about cicerom16 United States | Posts: 47 | Points: 141
neverjeeps


Guru

Patron
Reply
I'm pretty sure Obama already said he was make Iran pay if they fucked with Israel.

10:26 am on July 3, 2008 | Joined: Mar. 2008 | Days Active: 443
Join to learn more about neverjeeps Zimbabwe | Straight Male | Posts: 11,126 | Points: 20,719
carracer


Enlightened One
Reply
Quote: from Jettie12 at 1:15 am on June 30, 2008

Who knows. He'd probably give some vague answer as to what he'd do.

Some useless bullshit like
"Peace must happen and somehow, someway we will do it."

-------
The world is only as sweet as you make it and only as terrible as you see it


10:33 am on July 3, 2008 | Joined: Dec. 2007 | Days Active: 272
Join to learn more about carracer New York, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 10,511 | Points: 14,125
GodsFireAngel


Soothsayer
Reply
Quote: from nigeltheoutlaw at 4:16 am on July 3, 2008
Russia is trading with Iran in the form of DEFENSIVE missile systems? That doesn't seem odd, considering Israel has a more advanced air force than them and the fact that we are on the precipice of attacking them. FYI those missile systems are incapable of carrying a nuclear warhead.

You really don't understand the situation if you say that. Iran already has devilvery cabapilities (see below) to reach farther than Israel. They are buying sofisticateed AA and SAM to try to make it hard to attack the places where the nuclear materials are being weaponized[besides trying to increase collateral damage by building in cities]

Approximately 150 Scud-C [Shahab- 2] with 500km range and 700kg payload.
Up to 200 Scud-B [Shahab- 1] with 300km range and 985kg payload.
Approximately 200 CSS-8s with 150km range and 190kg payload.
Unknown quantity of indigenous Mushak-120 with 130km range and 150kg payload and Mushak-160 with 160km range and 500kg payload.
Launched almost 100 Scud-B against Iraq during 1985-1988.
Limited quantity of Shahab-3 with 1,300km range and over 700kg payload. In addition, there is suspicion of improvement on Shahab-3 bringing it to a 2,000km range.
Announced development of solid fuel for ballistic missiles to be installed on Shahab-3.
Reported development of Shahab-4 with 2,000km range and 1,000kg payload and Shahab-5 with approximately 5,500km range and 1,000kg payload.

Lets just all remember that Israel wouldn't attack Iran unless it really thought it was in the final process of weaponization or the "point of no return"

-------
[---}


3:22 pm on July 3, 2008 | Joined: April 2004 | Days Active: 272
Join to learn more about GodsFireAngel Italy | Straight Female | Posts: 7,915 | Points: 10,908
Pages: 1 2 3 Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic