If McCain cared more about Veterans then Obama, why did his co-sponsored bill only give benefits to soldiers who spend years longer serving the country then the bill he missed the vote on? As if spending only a few years didn't matter. That is what his bill implicitly argues.

So much love for the Vets eh?

-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo

I'm for more phased benefits, while keeping our current benefits.

-------
whoisabs i'm not sure
Guess who's back?

---

Why should there be any incentive to stay longer than 4 years?

I'm for more phased benefits, while keeping our current benefits.

---

No idea. But it's hard for someone who claims to be more supportive of the Vets to co-sponor a bill that says fuck you to soldiers who only serve a few years.

want to place bets that bassguitarplayer2010 won't respond to his bat shit claim of Iraq = defending Constitution?

-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo

---

Quote: from whoisabs at 2:36 pm on July 26, 2008

---

Why should there be any incentive to stay longer than 4 years?  

 I'm for more phased benefits, while keeping our current benefits.

---

No idea. But it's hard for someone who claims to be more supportive of the Vets to co-sponor a bill that says fuck you to soldiers who only serve a few years.  

want to place bets that bassguitarplayer2010 won't respond to his bat shit claim of Iraq = defending Constitution?

---

Just insult people and hope they go away.

Furthermore, the last time war was declared was in WWII.
Oh wait, you don't know anything about the Constitution.

Post edited at 5:55 pm on July 26, 2008 by obvious child

-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo

---

Quote: from obvious child at 5:38 pm on July 26, 2008

---

Quote: from whoisabs at 2:36 pm on July 26, 2008

---

Why should there be any incentive to stay longer than 4 years?  

  I'm for more phased benefits, while keeping our current benefits.

---

 

 No idea. But it's hard for someone who claims to be more supportive of the Vets to co-sponor a bill that says fuck you to soldiers who only serve a few years.  

 want to place bets that bassguitarplayer2010 won't respond to his bat shit claim of Iraq = defending Constitution?

---

DOnt need to jackass Im not a coward like you are, you may be a straight up snob but all I want is for the soldiers in Iraq to do their job and give the people in Iraq hope and thats all Im arguing about, and everytime Congress declares a state of war every soldier is fighting for 1 thing : the enemy who is willing to destroy it

---

bringin' hope and freedom to tha hajis, fur 'murica, by shootin' all the ones that ain't got any hope, kids and all, 'till they's a whole lot more hopeful on average

hooah

-------
"My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"

---

I guess that would be a stupid bet to take, given that Bass just proved he won't address that much less any other point one makes.

Just insult people and hope they go away.

---

You're still an idiot who knows nothing about the Constitution.

-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo

---

Which war? The war on terror is a joke. It's like a war on submarines.  

You're still an idiot who knows nothing about the Constitution.

---

---

See when you'd said that basiclly you just said to do nothing about 9/11, just let the attackers and their allies go unpunished and let the families of the victims suffer

---

Come again?

Where did I say that? Generally it's a good idea to argue with someone who made that argument, not attack someone who did not. If you wish to discuss that, argue it with the person who made that argument: yourself.

Furthermore, Saddam was the targets of two assassination attempts by bin laden. The two were not allies. Furthermore, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Go read the Government report on it. It's been out for YEARS.

You are clearly arguing from a position of absolute sheer ignorance.

You're an idiot, who still knows nothing about the Constitution.

-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo

---

Still waiting for you to explain how our involvement in Iraq is linked to the Constitution.

---

Everyone is.

-------
"I give the probability of this working at zero" - Dan DeMatteo

---

Quote: from bassguitarplayer2010 at 3:02 pm on July 26, 2008

---

See when you'd said that basiclly you just said to do nothing about 9/11, just let the attackers and their allies go unpunished and let the families of the victims suffer

---

Come again?  

Where did I say that? Generally it's a good idea to argue with someone who made that argument, not attack someone who did not. If you wish to discuss that, argue it with the person who made that argument: yourself.  

Furthermore, Saddam was the targets of two assassination attempts by bin laden. The two were not allies. Furthermore, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Go read the Government report on it. It's been out for YEARS.  

You are clearly arguing from a position of absolute sheer ignorance.  

You're an idiot, who still knows nothing about the Constitution.

---

Post edited at 6:24 pm on July 26, 2008 by bassguitarplayer2010

-------
A True Friend Stabs You in the Front