|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
Web Resources: Rape Myths Dispelled, Help & Information about Rape
USA Rape, Abuse and Incest Hotline: 1-800-656-HOPE (1-800-656-4673)
|
Web Resources: Teen Pregnancy Facts, Abortion Facts
USA Youth Crisis Hotline: 1-800-448-4663
|
MotoMojo
Wealthy Hobo
|
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 7:21 am on July 17, 2008
No matter how long it lives and how old it grows, a cockroach will never discover a cure for cancer, find a way to reverse global warming, end world hunger or really do much besides scurry and carry disease. If left to nature, a fetus will grow and develop and has the potential to do all of those things and still have time to make a perfect grilled cheese sandwich at the end of the day. Potential is the difference here. 
At the same time as this may be true, all of those things are human endeavors, and a cockroach has no place dealing with such things. If potential is the difference, then consider the potential of what could happen if ALL humans were gone (no harm to the ecosystem), and consider the potential of what could happen if all cockroaches were gone (ecosystem could potentially fail). Just because humans depend on each other doesn't mean that any other animal sees it that way, and if we're going to discuss something as politically complex as abortion (or, more broadly, murder), IMO, it's unwise to take a stance so generalized as "it's always wrong" or "it's always okay", because that simply will never be the case. For example, a 12 year old who lives in poverty is raped by her FATHER. She gets pregnant. The child will obviously have genetic deficiencies. Should she be able to have an abortion? Some people will say yes, and some will say no. But the only opinion that really holds any bearing on the situation should be the mother. I guess I'm not necessarily arguing that I think abortion is morally alright, but I think that it is ignorant to place humans on a pedestal so high above other creatures so as to say that, in ANY situation, a human fetus is more important than a beetle. A flip-side example, for the argument that abortion shouldn't be regarded as "always right" or "always wrong" is this: There is a sixteen year old girl with a family income of $500,000 annually. She has promiscuous unprotected sex and gets pregnant. She thinks a child would be stressful and would hurt her vagina. Should she be allowed to have an abortion? Post edited at 8:56 am on July 18, 2008 by MotoMojo
------- Spicy Pidgeon
|
8:54 am on July 18, 2008 | Joined: July 2004 | Days Active: 331 Join to learn more about MotoMojo Mississippi, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,694 | Points: 5,068
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MotoMojo
Wealthy Hobo
|
If the only argument against abortion is that it's murder, then I would have to argue that I consider "killing" anything to be "murder". If you kill a bug, that's murder. It's not a crime because bugs can't defend themselves (in trial or physically), and neither can a fetus. I will say that I do NOT support abortion in the vast majority of the cases, though. Not because it's any more wrong than killing an equally aware creature of a different species, but because it's ridiculously irresponsible, inconsiderate, and ignorantly selfish--just like killing a bug for no reason at all.
------- Spicy Pidgeon
|
10:38 pm on July 18, 2008 | Joined: July 2004 | Days Active: 331 Join to learn more about MotoMojo Mississippi, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,694 | Points: 5,068
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|