|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
| Choice |
Votes |
Percent |
|
| Yes it's my favorite! God bless America! |
19 |
34% |
|
| Eh it's ok, sure |
19 |
34% |
|
| DO NOT WANT |
17 |
30% |
|
| Vote Now! |
55 Votes Cast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss Prophetess
Wealthy Hobo
|
Personally, I love it here. Yes, we have problems, mainly economic, but even considering that, I like it here. :)
------- I hope I live to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Assaultrifle
Advisor
|
Hell yeah I love America!!!
------- Check out this AWESOME GAME: http://www.unforgivenwar.com/register.php?REF=19838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whoareyou
Technician
|
I love how your source is: Martinlutherking.org/the beast. Sounds very reliable.
The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. 
Abner Berry has been connected to the Communist Party, but the other names are not "all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA."
Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. 
Can you find another source for this? Because according to all my sources, Rustin left the Communist Party in 1941 when he met Philip Randolph, an African American trade union leader who strongly opposed communism. Although I don't trust your source at all, I will acknowledge that communism played a role in the civil rights movement. Since the early 1900's blacks have faced ever-present debate of: Booker T. or Du Bois? Submission to white oppression or retaliation? And if retaliation, then where exists the line between reasonable and radical? Communism was an easy philosophy to turn to, not because activists were un-American, but because it was a philosophy that abolishes racial differences. "I Never Met a Black Person Who Was in the Communist Party Because of the Soviet Union:" Jack O'Dell. King created a new alternative way for social change without violence and radicalism, thus broadening the methods for social change. Although King had communist supporters, that shouldn't mean that he aimed to dismantle American society in order to give blacks a better place, as your site is insinuating, with its references to radical Robert F. Williams, and the selected quotes used to represent King. Surely he had the power and influence to be the frightening black communist that so many whites in power wanted to paint him as, but he didn't us it for such. The greatness of Dr. King is he preached that democracy too could welcome blacks, if blacks were willing to fight for a fair democracy. Thus creating the needed niche between Du Bois and Washington that would finally perpetuate social change in the States. -- Also, Marxist=/= communist. You can have Marxist theories in America without being accused of communism... I refuse to read and/or try to disprove the rest of your post, because it's copied from an unreliable site obviously intent on slaughtering King's image. Also, you really shouldn't be going around saying things like
Micheal King (Martin Luther King Jr's real name) was a communist. 
Try: "in my opinion..." Post edited at 2:14 pm on Sep. 2, 2008 by whoareyou
------- Lord knows I'm a voodoo child.
|
|
|
kidd rune
Wealthy Hobo
Sustainer
|
Abner Berry has been connected to the Communist Party, but the other names are not "all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA." 
Yes, though many of them claim otherwise in defense, they were communists.
Can you find another source for this? Because according to all my sources, Rustin left the Communist Party in 1941 when he met Philip Randolph, an African American trade union leader who strongly opposed communism. 
Neither of us have the resources to disprove or prove this. Anyone can say that they are no longer a communist. It was also common seeing as Americans, at the time, we very anti-communist. ANYONE can say that they stopped being a communist, but, somehow, this info about the 16th convention is out. Try Googling the 16th Communist convention. You'll see that it happened, yet not much info at all on it.
Although I don't trust your source at all, I will acknowledge that communism played a role in the civil rights movement. Since the early 1900's blacks have faced ever-present debate of: Booker T. or Du Bois? Submission to white oppression or retaliation? And if retaliation, then where exists the line between reasonable and radical? Communism was an easy philosophy to turn to, not because activists were un-American, but because it was a philosophy that abolishes racial differences. 
The whole thought of Communism is inexcusable. Communism is a disgusting, inhumane ideal.
Although King had communist supporters, that shouldn't mean that he aimed to dismantle American society in order to give blacks a better place, as your site is insinuating, with its references to radical Robert F. Williams, and the selected quotes used to represent King. 
King was closely aligned with known members of the communist party. There are mountains of evidence to support the fact that King had both direct and indirect ties to known Communist Party members. In fact, one of his closest advisers, Stanley Levison, was a known member of the Communist Party. It's on public record that King was, if nothing else, affiliated with known communists. In fact, both John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy told King to sever all ties with communists. King defied their requests and was subsequently placed under surveillance by the FBI, as per Robert F. Kennedy's orders.
Surely he had the power and influence to be the frightening black communist that so many whites in power wanted to paint him as, but he didn't us it for such. 
Or did he? King wasn't a little angel that only wanted everyone to be treated equally by use of nonviolence. King openly admitted in his own book, "Why We Can't Wait," and in an article written for Saturday Review, that inciting people to violence is the key to success of the civil rights march. King stated: "Long years of experience indicate to us that Negroes can achieve this goal when four things occur: 1. Nonviolent demonstrators go into the streets to exercise their Constitutional rights. 2. Racists resist by unleashing violence against them. 3. Americans of conscience in the name of decency demand federal intervention and legislation. 4. The Administration, under mass pressure, initiates measures of immediate intervention and remedial legislation." (ML King, Jr., "Behind the Selma March", Saturday Review, April 3, 1965, pp. 16, 17; 57.)
The greatness of Dr. King is he preached that democracy too could welcome blacks, if blacks were willing to fight for a fair democracy. Thus creating the needed niche between Du Bois and Washington that would finally perpetuate social change in the States. 
He wanted only equality? This is probably the most repeated myth about King. Writing on National Review Online, There Heritage Foundation's Matthew Spalding wrote a piece entitled "Martin Luther King's Conservative Mind," where he wrote, "An agenda that advocates quotas, counting by race and set-asides takes us away from King's vision." The problem with this view is that King openly advocated quotas and racial set-asides. He wrote that the "Negro today is not struggling for some abstract, vague rights, but for concrete improvement in his way of life." When equal opportunity laws failed to achieve this, King looked for other ways. In his book Where Do We Go From Here, he suggested that "A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for him, to equip him to compete on a just and equal basis." To do this he expressed support for quotas. In a 1968 Playboy interview, he said, "If a city has a 30% Negro population, then it is logical to assume that Negroes should have at least 30% of the jobs in any particular company, and jobs in all categories rather than only in menial areas." King was more than just talk in this regard. Working through his Operation Breadbasket, King threatened boycotts of businesses that did not hire blacks in proportion to their population. King was even an early proponent of reparations. In his 1964 book, Why We Can't Wait, he wrote, "No amount of gold could provide an adequate compensation for the exploitation and humiliation of the Negro in America down through the centuries...Yet a price can be placed on unpaid wages. The ancient common law has always provided a remedy for the appropriation of a the labor of one human being by another. This law should be made to apply for American Negroes. The payment should be in the form of a massive program by the government of special, compensatory measures which could be regarded as a settlement in accordance with the accepted practice of common law. " Predicting that critics would note that many whites were equally disadvantaged, King claimed that his program, which he called the "Bill of Rights for the Disadvantaged" would help poor whites as well. This is because once the blacks received reparations, the poor whites would realize that their real enemy was rich whites.
Also, Marxist=/= communist. You can have Marxist theories in America without being accused of communism... 
Yes, but it's inexcusable that he was so close to people in the American COMMUNIST party.
I refuse to read and/or try to disprove the rest of your post, because it's copied from an unreliable site obviously intent on slaughtering King's image. 
I refuse to read from an unreliable site obviously intent on faking King's image.
Try: "in my opinion..." 
It's not an opinion. King admitted to being a Marxist and had ties with many Communists. I can't wait till 2027 when his private file is released. THEN you'll know that info about King that will "ruin his reputation". Silly FBI surveillance tapes...
------- "If you worship your enemy, you are defeated. If you adopt your enemy's religion you are enslaved. If you breed with your enemy you are destroyed." -Polydoros
|
|
|
whoareyou
Technician
|
King was closely aligned with known members of the communist party. There are mountains of evidence to support the fact that King had both direct and indirect ties to known Communist Party members. In fact, one of his closest advisers, Stanley Levison, was a known member of the Communist Party. 
But communism didn't have a key role in the movement itself. Neither King nor his movement preached an alternative to the American democracy. Plus, communism would have hindered, not helped his movement, and would have only exacerbated racial tension between blacks and whites. Communism and racial integration could not coexist in his "dream". Even if he were a communist and was only pretending to be a clergyman with the righteousness that only devout religious preachers have, he never would have used those theories for the movement, because that would be a step backwards. Therefore, as a political leader, you can hardly categorize him as communist. Asserting King's political theories, how do the aforementioned make him a communist threat? King figured out what it takes to make social change. Is it his fault that the black community could only be heard when it was unarguable that racists were mistreating them horribly? The government was too comfortable enough with turning the other cheek to react unless provoked with obvious proof of human rights breechings.
He wanted only equality? 
As a leader of an oppressed community, how can you blame him for wanting more than just "equal human rights"? If you lock a person up in a cage for a week, they're not going to react with: "Gee, thanks for letting me out", upon release. It's inevitable for a leader of an oppressed people to ask for more than just "equal rights", and it doesn't make him un-American. Is there a better alternative reaction to this situation? I think that considering the conditions, this reaction was inevitable. - His Operation Breadbasket wasn't realistic and it wasn't reasonable. Plenty of white presidents have had equally unrealistic and unreasonable ideas. They get rejected, forgiven, and then they move on. So it goes. It's called trying to find a good solution.
It's not an opinion. King admitted to being a Marxist and had ties with many Communists. 
You may call it a theory.
------- Lord knows I'm a voodoo child.
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|