Quote: from Permious at 11:05 am on Aug. 3, 2008
Of course niggers have to have a much higher HIV rate than white people. I mean God forbid a girl can enjoy a black cock now and again without having to worry about AIDS.
Jesus makes me sick sometimes.

You are the dumbest fucking skank on the planet.
Let me show you what seperates the fucking sluts from the people who matter.
---
89 / 100,000 is the African-American prevalence rate.
That represents a fucking 0.089% prevalence percentage. This rate is not even at an unpredecented 0.1% . That says it all. Every time you have sex with a member of this group, you have this percentage of contracting HIV. And assuming you don't fuck anyone over the age of 50 (even 45, you nasty fucks) in the present day...
[Age (Years) Estimated # of AIDS Cases in 2006 Cumulative Estimated # of AIDS Cases, Through 2006*
Ages 45-49 5,628 107,207
Ages 50-54 3,687 59,907
Ages 55-59 2,071 32,190
Ages 60-64 955 17,303
Ages 65 or older 835 15,074]
The risk is significantly lower than 0.089%.
The miniscule 0.089% risk lies in high risk homosexual and high risk heterosexual sex as stipulated by the studies. So, therefore, it lies in hookers, fags and men who have sex with them in the US. And even then you don't even have a ghost of a chance. People who use needles have a higher risk as well. So, people who fuck druggies need to back the fuck up too (there are a lot of druggies in poorer areas, look down).
Half of all African-Americans live below the poverty line so it is there that HIV breeds, in the hookers and druggies. Where people don't have as much education about the disease.
Transmission Category Estimated # of AIDS Cases, in 2006
Adult and Adolescent Male Adult and Adolescent Female Total
Male-to-male sexual contact 16,001 - 16,001
Injection drug use 4,410 2,385 6,795
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use 1,803 - 1,803
High-risk heterosexual contact* 4,558 7,196 11,754
Other** 217 220 437
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm#aidsrace
BTW, the 40% increase affects the estimate rate, not the values posted above.
--
Even though the percentage is exceedingly low, it is imperative that one screen partners. But when factoring in these accounts, the risk of HIV is exaggerated to encourage people to make sure they know the status of their partners.
*bows*
Post edited at 11:00 pm on Aug. 3, 2008 by Takinam