|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
Web Resources: Rape Myths Dispelled, Help & Information about Rape
USA Rape, Abuse and Incest Hotline: 1-800-656-HOPE (1-800-656-4673)
|
| Choice |
Votes |
Percent |
|
| Yes the media is fooling us into thinking they are bad. |
34 |
54% |
|
| No muslims are bad and suicidal idiots. |
10 |
16% |
|
| No comment :| |
18 |
29% |
|
| Vote Now! |
62 Votes Cast |
|
|
|
|
|
exceedinglyrare
Delicate Thing
Patron
|
Quote: from Shaknbake at 3:11 am on July 18, 2008
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 8:04 pm on July 17, 2008
Secondly, Islam the religion is neither good nor bad. It is an idea and it is neutral. It is in the hands of people that it is used for good or for evil, as is the case with every religion. 
Do you believe in this specific instance that Islam is neutral, or do you believe that an idea, a belief system CANNOT be anything but neutral? There aren't beliefs that are bad even when unpracticed/interpreted differently? 
Consider: if even the worst idea was never put into practice, would it truly be bad? Or is it simply the practice of ideas that makes them evil or good? I tend to think that 99% of the time, beliefs, particularly of a religious nature, are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, and that it's solely the way in which they're practiced that makes them good or bad.
------- Let yourself be enchanted, You just might break through To ever ever after
|
|
|
youatemypeanut
Professional
|
See, the thing is, with every religion you're going to have those who will use it to harm others in the name of God. And you will have those that are pretty much neutral. I guess you could say they're good. You can't base an entire religion off of a few people from it.
|
|
|
SpM
Honorary Swami
Sustainer
|
Null vote. I dislike many aspects of Islam, but I do not think Muslims in general are "bad and suicidal idiots".
|
5:28 am on July 18, 2008 | Joined Feb. 2007 | 466 Days Active Join to learn more about SpM Scotland, United Kingdom | 25378 Posts | 31124 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lepperking
Wealthy Hobo
|
No religion is good.
------- Call me Dan. I Hustle girls, Party and play 360. Fresh 101.
|
|
|
exceedinglyrare
Delicate Thing
Patron
|
Quote: from Shaknbake at 2:15 am on July 20, 2008
Quote: from exceedinglyrare at 4:58 am on July 18, 2008
Consider: if even the worst idea was never put into practice, would it truly be bad? Or is it simply the practice of ideas that makes them evil or good? I tend to think that 99% of the time, beliefs, particularly of a religious nature, are neither good nor bad in and of themselves, and that it's solely the way in which they're practiced that makes them good or bad. 
I'm afraid I do believe that a belief, unpracticed or not, can be bad or good, including religious ones. 
How can a belief by itself be bad or good?
------- Let yourself be enchanted, You just might break through To ever ever after
|
|
|
Luv4allHatred4non
Advisor
|
Quote: from lsd at 5:05 pm on July 17, 2008
Islam is a good religion, and Muslims are good people - in spite of the founder of the religion. 
===================================== Peace! Can a bad tree produce good fruits? The blessed holy prophet was called The Truthful and The Trustworthy throughout his life from choldhood. He stood up for oppressed, helped the needy and reestablished the lost morals. After his claim of Unity of God, holy prophet Muhammad's well-wishers began to harbour ill for him. Friends turned into foes. He braved such hardships which are beyond a pretender and imposter to suffer through. He started his life as a powerless, helpless, unlettered, and unaided moneyless orphan. He brought the message of God and succeeded against great nations of world who had plentitude of financial, military, and intellectual means. He brought forth resplendent education with conclusive arguments, irrefutable proofs which dumb-founded every opponent. To excel the whole world in spirit, wisdom, knowledge and strength, can this be accomplished without the help of God? ------- Poses the question, his subserviant The Ahmadiyya reformer. In religious evolution, his was perfection-step of the message of (All Blessed) Adam to Abraham to Moses to Jesus . His education declared all of them the pure and holy servants of God and cleared all allegations which were put on them by enemies of religion. Statistically it is provable that his message flourished during peace years. Only after great sufferings of 13-long years, he and his followers were allowed by God for self defence but with lot of restrictions; NOW conditions gone, swords gone. Time is for striving for self-excellence with pen and morals. If today some people are abusing his all-peace education for their political wars, blame should not go to Holiness Muhammad. Two world wars were fought mainly among christains BUT blame can not be put on Bible. STATISTICS: -------------- 1)-- War waged at BADAR* on muslims in 2nd year of migration of holy prophet . Muslims were 313 versus 1000 opponents. (For 13 long years muslims were persecuted but never retaliated) 2)-- War waged on muslims on 3rd year of migration at OHAD. Muslims were 700 versus 3000 opponents. 3)-- 6th year of migration peace truce of no-war between muslims and opponents at HUDABIYA. Peace message was spread. 4)-- Muslims came to Mecca victorious in 10,000 . RESULT: During wars progress was slow but in peace time, message of love to God and love to Humanity fast spread. ------ BADAR* = Meccans were outraged on the safe migration of the holy prophet and his progress in Medina. On the second year of the Hijrah (holy Prophet's escape from Mecca) , the Prophet learnt that the Meccans/ Quresh were coming to Medina with a big army. He wanted to meet the enemy far away from the town. He also came to know that a big trade caravan of the Quresh was on its way to Mecca; the Meccan army was there ostensibly to protect it. The prophet was prepared as best as he could. But he had not many means for an armed conflict. The Meccans had raised a big force. They had enlisted every fighting man. Only two chiefs of the town were not willing to join them. One was Abu Lahab, an uncle, but a great enemy of the Prophet. His sister had had a fearful dream. He was frightened on that account. The other was Umaiyya bin Khalaf, another bitter enemy of Islam. He greatly feared death. He had learnt that Prophet had predicted that he would die in the battlefield. He knew the Prophet spoke the truth but he was forced to join the army against his will. --w.alislam.org ---------------------------------------------------------- A good source: http://alislam.org/library/books/muhammad_seal_of_the_prophets/ written by a scholar who was ex president of United Nation's General assembly and ex president of International Court of Justice, hague, Holland. Post edited at 3:47 am on July 24, 2008 by Luv4allHatred4non
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exceedinglyrare
Delicate Thing
Patron
|
How would that be bad if it wasn't put into practice? I mean, it's a weird belief and one that most people wouldn't hold, but if Joe Schmoe who holds it isn't skipping around raping people or encouraging others to do the same, how is it inherently bad?
------- Let yourself be enchanted, You just might break through To ever ever after
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|