a Chevy Tahoe Suv with a 1.0 Liter Engine :]
It's pretty fast... not really!

-------
I am running: AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core Processor 5600+
3GB Memory Dual Channel, 400GB hard drive

Then there is the fact that it was programmed in a way that there was very little communication between departments, so there are a lot of things that don't match up, making glitches.

It's just a bad OS all around. I can only hope that Windows 7 is an improvement.

FP

-------
I think we are in rats' alley
Where the dead men lost their bones.

---

I have Vista and I think it is much better the XP

---

The only thing going for it is that it's visually impressive.

FP

-------
I think we are in rats' alley
Where the dead men lost their bones.

---

It's a system hog and generally doesn't handle anything efficiently.

---

Dude, the fact that you say that, and support oboma, shows that you need to be summarily liquidated.

-------
all dazed out from smoking melted twinkies
The incredible, lunchbox
Yama nashi, Ochi nashi, Imi nashi
One more knife tear for the road.

In short, no, Vista is not worse, as long as you don't go for the basic versions. Go for a PC that comes with it installed and you will be fine. Don't upgrade as thats a bad plan.

-------
Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation
http://craigk.org/pictures/
Can you work out the code?

---

Quote: from motorhead at 9:58 am on July 19, 2008

---

It's a system hog and generally doesn't handle anything efficiently.

---

Dude, the fact that you say that, and support oboma, shows that you need to be summarily liquidated.

---

The fact that you say that shows how much of a fascist you are.

-------
And when you're up watching cartoons at like 3 in the
morning you're nice and low to the ground
with your bean bag chair so when you
roll over you can sleep on the floor naked with your bag of cheetos

If your computer doesn't meet the reccomended requirements, then you shouldn't intall vista on it. If you HAVE the reccomended requirements, Vista is amazing.

Vista will actually play games better then XP if you have a decent system. Vista manages resources MUCH better then XP if you have the reccomended amount.

Threads full of people making comments about vista that dont know what they're talking about make me RAAAGEEE

---

Yep. Worse. Just as others said, its slower than XP when its operating on an average computer and can't handle anything efficiently. My brand new Dell came with Vista and it operated poorly even when nothing was on it. My programs and software kept closing on their own. I don't use that PC anymore. I use my MacBook.

---

Your mistake was buying one of Dell Super Duper Discount computers. Do some research next time.

My parents did buy one of those "Dell Super Duper Discount" computers for themselves, but I think if they're selling a computer that has it installed, it should be able to handle it well. It was a dual core processor. It crashed so many times, we finally bought a copy of Windows XP and downgraded the computer, which is just sad.

But on my bottom to mid range laptop, it was a nightmare.  Slow as hell, crashed constantly, countless useless programs that were tricky to remove completely...it just wasn't worth it.  Quickly gave up on Vista, put on Linux Mint, and was perfectly happy with it.  And soon after made it a dual boot with Windows XP on it, and it is a perfect laptop.

-------
"Saying you love someone is not enough,
it's how you treat them that shows your true feelings." -Ryanne Mace