---

Quote: from Baron Samedi at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008

---

Do the French count as an ethnic group?

---

y not

---

Sweet.

The French are gone.

-------
┌─┐
┴─┴
ಠ_ರೃ

---

Quote: from Clouse227 at 12:23 am on Aug. 20, 2008

---

Whichever one has the smallest population.

---

That's what I was thinking.

---

yeah, that'd be my choice too.

---

Whichever race is responsible for coming up with this stupid forum is gone.

---

For that reason, if faced with the choice, I'd eliminate all white people.

That was not a racist comment. I'm 50% white, and made that decision purely based on logic with no personal bias.

-------
Punk rock died when the first kid said, "Punk's not dead."

---

I think it's pretty founded to say that the white/caucasian race is, historically, responsible for the most destruction on this planet. Also, when it comes to waste and sustainability, whites are the most gluttonous per capita.

---

Ending that will halt all technological progress and slowly push us back into the stone age.

Back on topic:
If I HAD TO, it would be the Australoid natives of Australia. They don't really do anything. They are still living in the stone age.

-------
"One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the
woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents...
occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik,
Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"

---

No doubt, though, Caucasians have contributed more to our lifestyle than any other race (and probably all other races COMBINED).

---

I'd be more apt to say that whites, or rather European civilization in particular, has brought about more global change than any single entity prior to it ever has. With change comes the introduction to the new and the destruction of the old. You can be sure that the hunter gatherers of yore begrudgingly settled down to agricultural communities as soon as the climates they and their ancestors had lived on for generations began drying up, or were overran by conquerers of an agricultural society where, in turn, the successful were the ones who assimilated. Out with the old, in with the new.

Obviously, change isn't always for the better (at least for the individual; for the whole, it usually is; moreover, what is "good" and "bad" here all depends on the eye of the beholder) and being forced to conform to a new way of life is met with resent by many. The Europeans, however, are a product of anybody in their position, with the same resources, wealth, outward look to the rest of the world, etc. No other race would do any different provided they had all that, and even if the things the Europeans had done were to hypothetically not happen, such change and resent is only inevitable as global society progresses. To say that whites deserve to be eradicated over any other race is, to put it bluntly, racist in and of itself for it assumes that there is a negative characteristic inherent in those of European descent to bring about chaos and destruction in the world that no other race can / would. The same really goes for wanting to eradicate the world of any other race for something one might believe is inherent in their characteristics.

To be quite honest, I'd make my decision via the roll of a dice like it were a game of craps. While the deaths of many is a sad thing, I see no reason to value a particular race over another.

Post edited at 4:40 am on Aug. 20, 2008 by Bud2400

---

I think it's pretty founded to say that the white/caucasian race is, historically, responsible for the most destruction on this planet. Also, when it comes to waste and sustainability, whites are the most gluttonous per capita.  

For that reason, if faced with the choice, I'd eliminate all white people.  

That was not a racist comment. I'm 50% white, and made that decision purely based on logic with no personal bias.

---

Agree

-------
~If you don't stand for something, You'll fall for anything~

---

the japs

---

Dumb. You probably got your feminine hairstyle and look from them.

---

Quote: from JeanClaude at 10:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008

---

the japs

---

Dumb. You probably got your feminine hairstyle and look from them.

---

You have no idea

-------
yiff me you ugly son of a bitch
you ugly son of a BITCH

---

If I HAD TO, it would be the Australoid natives of Australia. They don't really do anything. They are still living in the stone age.

---

Which has what to do with anything? Anyone who would seriously choose anything but the absolute smallest distinct ethnic group is a thoughtless, inhuman monster.

---

y not

---

Why not? Because "French" is a nationality. There are numerous distinct ethnic groups making up "the French," just as many distinct ethnic groups make up "the Americans" or "the Chinese" or "The Dutch," etc.