---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:03 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:00 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from jamesish at 7:57 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

It really doesn't surprise me. Prepare for more US stupid things done.

---

ur an idiot. how is that a stupid action? building a system, that defends our allies from missile attacks?

---

 

 It isn't there primarily to defend your allies from attack, it's there to cover your own backside from intercontinental nuclear warheads.

---

either way. is it a bad idea to build a system that can defend our allies OR the usa from missile attacks?..its not an offensive weapon syetm. how the fuck is it a bad idea?

---

Can you seriously not understand why?
Do you honestly think the Russian's will see it that way?
What gives you the right to have a defense system so close to Russian borders, without reciprocal measures being taken by the Russians.
Refer to the CMC.

-------
tick makes me tock.

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:05 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:03 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:00 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from jamesish at 7:57 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

It really doesn't surprise me. Prepare for more US stupid things done.

---

ur an idiot. how is that a stupid action? building a system, that defends our allies from missile attacks?

---

 

  It isn't there primarily to defend your allies from attack, it's there to cover your own backside from intercontinental nuclear warheads.

---

either way. is it a bad idea to build a system that can defend our allies OR the usa from missile attacks?..its not an offensive weapon syetm. how the fuck is it a bad idea?

---

Can you seriously not understand why?
Do you honestly think the Russian's will see it that way?
What gives you the right to have a defense system so close to Russian borders, without reciprocal measures being taken by the Russians.
Refer to the CMC.

---

---

Quote: from SLynch89 at 10:59 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from jamesish at 7:57 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

It really doesn't surprise me. Prepare for more US stupid things done.

---

 

 How on earth is it a stupid move to place interceptor missiles in an allied nation when Russia has repeatedly shown in the last year that they are as militaristic and war hungry as in the days of the soviet union? Tell me how the hell is that a stupid move?

---

Because of world opinion. We are always being watched like a victim of peeping tom. We didn't need to go in there. It makes us look bad.

---

---

Quote: from jamesish at 11:06 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from SLynch89 at 10:59 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from jamesish at 7:57 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

It really doesn't surprise me. Prepare for more US stupid things done.

---

  How on earth is it a stupid move to place interceptor missiles in an allied nation when Russia has repeatedly shown in the last year that they are as militaristic and war hungry as in the days of the soviet union? Tell me how the hell is that a stupid move?

---

 

 Because of world opinion.  We are always being watched like a victim of peeping tom.  We didn't need to go in there.  It makes us look bad.

---

world opinion? what a joke, people will just think of something else to bitch about

---

That they will.

---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:07 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:05 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:03 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:00 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from jamesish at 7:57 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

It really doesn't surprise me. Prepare for more US stupid things done.

---

ur an idiot. how is that a stupid action? building a system, that defends our allies from missile attacks?

---

 

  It isn't there primarily to defend your allies from attack, it's there to cover your own backside from intercontinental nuclear warheads.

---

either way. is it a bad idea to build a system that can defend our allies OR the usa from missile attacks?..its not an offensive weapon syetm. how the fuck is it a bad idea?

---

 

 Can you seriously not understand why?  
 Do you honestly think the Russian's will see it that way?  
 What gives you the right to have a defense system so close to Russian borders, without reciprocal measures being taken by the Russians.  
 Refer to the CMC.

---

i dont give a fuck what the russians think. if they dont launch any missiles it wont be a god damn problem. do you understand what would happen if russia launched a nuclear missle at europe?

---

Well thats why you don't understand, for that reason.
It's like saying OH, "i'm going to murder your wife, i don't care what you think"

Russia launching a missile just gets them in the shit. Mutually assured destruction is what its all about now.

-------
tick makes me tock.

---

maybe we should just let them launch a bunch of missiles at cadriff

---

You seem to think the UK is defenseless to missile attack.

-------
tick makes me tock.

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:12 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

maybe we should just let them launch a bunch of missiles at cadriff

---

You seem to think the UK is defenseless to missile attack.

---

---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:13 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:12 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

maybe we should just let them launch a bunch of missiles at cadriff

---

 

 You seem to think the UK is defenseless to missile attack.

---

well there not now that we put a defense system in that will fucking protect them but you dont want that added protection for some reason.

---

Usual American bigotry, we have our own ways of dealing with it. RAF / Eurofighter's / Rapier systems would make short work of anything short of nuclear.

Plus the Russian's wouldn't launch anything at the UK due the fact that we possess nuclear warheads.

-------
tick makes me tock.

Well thats why you don't understand, for that reason.
It's like saying OH, "i'm going to murder your wife, i don't care what you think"

Russia launching a missile just gets them in the shit. Mutually assured destruction is what its all about now.

no thats not the same at all. building a defense system is not a reason for russia to launch an attack. if it was on offensive system it would be  completely different story. do u wanna be blown to fucking pieces?

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:15 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:13 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:12 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

maybe we should just let them launch a bunch of missiles at cadriff

---

 

  You seem to think the UK is defenseless to missile attack.

---

well there not now that we put a defense system in that will fucking protect them but you dont want that added protection for some reason.

---

Usual American bigotry, we have our own ways of dealing with it. RAF / Eurofighter's / Rapier systems would make short work of anything short of nuclear.

Plus the Russian's wouldn't launch anything at the UK due the fact that we possess nuclear warheads.

---

---

 Well thats why you don't understand, for that reason.  
 It's like saying OH, "i'm going to murder your wife, i don't care what you think"  

 Russia launching a missile just gets them in the shit. Mutually assured destruction is what its all about now.  

 no thats not the same at all. building a defense system is not a reason for russia to launch an attack. if it was on offensive system it would be completely different story. do u wanna be blown to fucking pieces?

---

It has the POTENTIAL to be an offensive station.

-------
tick makes me tock.

---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:17 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:15 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from mikeyp123 at 8:13 am on Aug. 15, 2008

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:12 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

maybe we should just let them launch a bunch of missiles at cadriff

---

 

  You seem to think the UK is defenseless to missile attack.

---

well there not now that we put a defense system in that will fucking protect them but you dont want that added protection for some reason.

---

 

 Usual American bigotry, we have our own ways of dealing with it. RAF / Eurofighter's / Rapier systems would make short work of anything short of nuclear.  

 Plus the Russian's wouldn't launch anything at the UK due the fact that we possess nuclear warheads.

---

what makes you so sure that they wouldnt launch nukes at you first? dont you agree that added defense is better for you in the end?

---

I'd rather rely on our current system and a non-existent threat than risk tension between Russia and America potentially leading into a war.


-------
tick makes me tock.

---

Quote: from churnfulkiler at 4:17 pm on Aug. 15, 2008

---

 

  Well thats why you don't understand, for that reason.  
  It's like saying OH, "i'm going to murder your wife, i don't care what you think"  

  Russia launching a missile just gets them in the shit. Mutually assured destruction is what its all about now.  

  no thats not the same at all. building a defense system is not a reason for russia to launch an attack. if it was on offensive system it would be  completely different story. do u wanna be blown to fucking pieces?

---

It has the POTENTIAL to be an offensive station.

---

---

its a missle defense system that also protects europe aka ur fucking country u prick

---

European countries do have missile defense systems and do you think 10 interceptor missiles will defend Europe from Iran?