God=/= Reason. Not in my book.

-------
People ask you for criticism, but they only want praise.

>>Well, the fact that you can't really explain how/why those elements can comprise living organisms and non-living objects with no obvious differences in that elemental make-up would be the point I'm making. But you want someone to explain God... who may or may not be made up of those elements.

You said earlier that you are 'well versed in this area', what did you mean? <<

There are no obvious difference in the elements themselves, it is the arrangement and proportions of amounts of these elements respectively which determines if they are 'alive' or not. I have phrased this several different ways, yet you still insist that I can't explain my own stance, which is an ignorant stance to assume considering I can't very well explain anyone ELSE'S stance better than my own, can I? But the first sentence of this paragraph would be the most easily understandable way I can think of to describe my position on that. Please stop kicking the horse.

Again, I haven't asked for anyone to explain god -- merely speculate using known physics as to what he could be made of, since he obviously supercedes logic.

And finally, I meant that I have read many articles on the logic of religion, have read the bible, have spent many many months, maybe years, arguing religious theory with people.

Can you please back off with the jumping of the conclusions?

-------
This is my signature.