LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 652 users online 187008 members 948 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Video | Dictionary | News | FAQ
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
6 online / 30 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic

Obama is for change, so was Mussolini
What kind of change and is it for the better?
Replies: 47Last Post July 16 11:48pm by Ergos
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 3 4  Next » Email Print Favorite
Post from this position was omitted due to content violations
gogreengeckos8D


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Elm at 8:44 am on July 10, 2008Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 8:42 am on July 10, 2008Quote: from Elm at 8:01 am on July 10, 2008


First of all, it's not "a few brigades" Obama would move out. It's all of them. And the only reason he would keep any there would be to protect Americans both in Iraq and in America. Second, even if it isn't all that different from Bush's plan, that doesn't mean it's a bad idea.
Also, McCain wants to keep *all* the troops in Iraq, and if these are the two candidates to choose between, Obama is a better pick as far as Iraq is concerned.  

What part of this phrase "if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda" mentions that he will keep an amount of troops in Iraq which is less than we have now?  

No part of it functions as the escape clause which he can say that Al Qeada is still building bases (which they've done throughout post war Iraq) and so we can't remove troops yet.  

There are also more than two candidates to choose from.




What part of the phrase "Obama will have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months" implies that he will leave as many troops in Iraq as there are now? I really, really doubt that Obama will keep almost 150,000 troops in there to bomb Al Queda.

Post edited at 8:52 am on July 10, 2008 by gogreengeckos8D


8:51 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined May 2007 | 90 Days Active
Join to learn more about gogreengeckos8D Alabama, United States | GLBT Ally Female | 591 Posts | 1504 Points
( Elm )


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 8:51 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from Elm at 8:44 am on July 10, 2008Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 8:42 am on July 10, 2008Quote: from Elm at 8:01 am on July 10, 2008

 
 First of all, it's not "a few brigades" Obama would move out. It's all of them. And the only reason he would keep any there would be to protect Americans both in Iraq and in America. Second, even if it isn't all that different from Bush's plan, that doesn't mean it's a bad idea.  
 Also, McCain wants to keep *all* the troops in Iraq, and if these are the two candidates to choose between, Obama is a better pick as far as Iraq is concerned.  

What part of this phrase "if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda" mentions that he will keep an amount of troops in Iraq which is less than we have now?  

No part of it functions as the escape clause which he can say that Al Qeada is still building bases (which they've done throughout post war Iraq) and so we can't remove troops yet.  

There are also more than two candidates to choose from.



 
What part of the phrase "Obama will have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months" implies that he will leave as many troops in Iraq as there are now? I really, really doubt that Obama will keep almost 150,000 troops in there to bomb Al Queda.

No part of that phrase says it.  I wasn't talking about that phrase I was talking about the one that acts as an exemptive clause for that phrase.  He basically said "I'll take all the combat troops out of Iraq unless Al Qeada continues to do what they have been doing."  and that isn't a statement thats worth shit.


8:57 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined Dec. 2006 | 206 Days Active
Join to learn more about Elm Pennsylvania, United States | 3447 Posts | 5612 Points
PewPew


Wealthy Hobo
Reply
Quote: from Prince o palities at 7:57 am on July 10, 2008

Right, but Obama strikes me more as an Islamo-communist than an Islamo-fascist.

How did you arrive at Communist and Islamo?

-------
Mankind shall never be truly free
until the last king is hanged with the guts of the last priest. -Voltaire


8:58 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined Nov. 2007 | 232 Days Active
Join to learn more about PewPew Ukraine | Straight Male | 1966 Posts | 4327 Points
gogreengeckos8D


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Elm at 8:57 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 8:51 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from Elm at 8:44 am on July 10, 2008Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 8:42 am on July 10, 2008Quote: from Elm at 8:01 am on July 10, 2008

 
  First of all, it's not "a few brigades" Obama would move out. It's all of them. And the only reason he would keep any there would be to protect Americans both in Iraq and in America. Second, even if it isn't all that different from Bush's plan, that doesn't mean it's a bad idea.  
  Also, McCain wants to keep *all* the troops in Iraq, and if these are the two candidates to choose between, Obama is a better pick as far as Iraq is concerned.  

 What part of this phrase "if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda" mentions that he will keep an amount of troops in Iraq which is less than we have now?  

 No part of it functions as the escape clause which he can say that Al Qeada is still building bases (which they've done throughout post war Iraq) and so we can't remove troops yet.  

 There are also more than two candidates to choose from.  
 


 
 
 What part of the phrase "Obama will have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months" implies that he will leave as many troops in Iraq as there are now? I really, really doubt that Obama will keep almost 150,000 troops in there to bomb Al Queda.

No part of that phrase says it. I wasn't talking about that phrase I was talking about the one that acts as an exemptive clause for that phrase. He basically said "I'll take all the combat troops out of Iraq unless Al Qeada continues to do what they have been doing." and that isn't a statement thats worth shit.



Like I said before, he's not going to leave all the troops there, just a few to make sure that we don't have a retake of 9/11 or worse.


9:01 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined May 2007 | 90 Days Active
Join to learn more about gogreengeckos8D Alabama, United States | GLBT Ally Female | 591 Posts | 1504 Points
( Elm )


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
He doesn't say how many he will leave or not leave if Al Qeada continues to build bases.  You are reading into it that he will only leave some.  I believe that is what he wants people to read into it while not actually making a statement that says that.

9:02 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined Dec. 2006 | 206 Days Active
Join to learn more about Elm Pennsylvania, United States | 3447 Posts | 5612 Points
gogreengeckos8D


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from PewPew at 8:58 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from Prince o palities at 7:57 am on July 10, 2008

Right, but Obama strikes me more as an Islamo-communist than an Islamo-fascist.

How did you arrive at Communist and Islamo?


Communist cuz he's liberal, Islamo cuz of his name. Because obviously he's a Muslim.


9:02 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined May 2007 | 90 Days Active
Join to learn more about gogreengeckos8D Alabama, United States | GLBT Ally Female | 591 Posts | 1504 Points
gogreengeckos8D


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Elm at 9:02 am on July 10, 2008

He doesn't say how many he will leave or not leave if Al Qeada continues to build bases. You are reading into it that he will only leave some. I believe that is what he wants people to read into it while not actually making a statement that says that.

Lol, whatever you say.


9:05 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined May 2007 | 90 Days Active
Join to learn more about gogreengeckos8D Alabama, United States | GLBT Ally Female | 591 Posts | 1504 Points
( Elm )


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 9:05 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from Elm at 9:02 am on July 10, 2008

He doesn't say how many he will leave or not leave if Al Qeada continues to build bases.  You are reading into it that he will only leave some.  I believe that is what he wants people to read into it while not actually making a statement that says that.

Lol, whatever you say.


It's true.  Just because you don't like it being pointed out doesn't make it any less factual.  There is nothing stated in the words themselves that indicates any withdraw of troops should AL Qeada continue to build bases in Iraq.  You really want there to be so that is how you read it.

This is how politicians work - they carefully craft issue statements that don't actually promise anything.  You are filling in the missing pieces with what you want and hope he will do.  


9:08 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined Dec. 2006 | 206 Days Active
Join to learn more about Elm Pennsylvania, United States | 3447 Posts | 5612 Points
gogreengeckos8D


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from Elm at 9:08 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 9:05 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from Elm at 9:02 am on July 10, 2008

He doesn't say how many he will leave or not leave if Al Qeada continues to build bases. You are reading into it that he will only leave some. I believe that is what he wants people to read into it while not actually making a statement that says that.
 

 Lol, whatever you say.


It's true. Just because you don't like it being pointed out doesn't make it any less factual. There is nothing stated in the words themselves tht indicates any withdraw of troops should AL Qeada continue to build bases in Iraq. You really want there to be so that is how you read it.

This is how politicians work - they carefully craft issue statements that don't actually promise anything. You are filling in the missing pieces with what you want and hope he will do.


I'm not arguing with you-you could be right-but I don't agree with you. We'll just have to wait and see what happens.


9:10 am on July 10, 2008 | Joined May 2007 | 90 Days Active
Join to learn more about gogreengeckos8D Alabama, United States | GLBT Ally Female | 591 Posts | 1504 Points
neverjeeps


Soothsayer

Patron
Reply
Quote: from Elm at 7:56 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from IceTeaEdwin at 7:54 am on July 10, 2008

Oh yea, because McCain is WAY better and will make the people safer -_-  

 Choose the lesser of two evils...  

 Besides, Obama isn't evil >->


I never said McCain was better. What kind of change is Obama talking about because it obviously isn't on any important issues.

Tell me what changes he would make.



Seriously elm, you win. Obama is no change. A half black man who says he is a democrat and wants free health care.
That is no change. How about following the constitution for change.
Fuck Obama and McCain.

-------
Hi, my name is Jacob. Say hello to my whispering television.

1:45 pm on July 10, 2008 | Joined Mar. 2008 | 191 Days Active
Join to learn more about neverjeeps South Dakota, United States | Straight Male | 7467 Posts | 11203 Points
Nippon Wolf


Technician
Reply
I personally don't believe either Obama or McCain will make significant difference in the general strategy in Iraq. Obama being a little better. On the Iran issue I believe Obama might be slightly better. Most of the differences in rhetoric will mean nothing when Obama or McCain becomes president. One economics there will be a more significant difference but still not much. On the economy McCain comes out a bit ahead. Pro free trade and free market, the only problem is he might move too close to corporate welfare, which destroys the benefits of the free market and creates more problems for the free market than they help. Obama wants to employ much more regulation that will probably be more detrimental because most regulations end up doing more damage than good. For example ethanol corn subsidies anyone, Obama is a huge fan of that, McCain wants to get rid of them. I like that McCain will probably free up America's protectionist trade policies and reducing subsidies. On civil liberties I doubt Obama will want to give up the executive powers in surveillance and detaining enemy combatants once he is the president. The biggest difference in a McCain versus Obama presidency will be replacing Supreme Court Judges, on that I trust neither, I trust Justice Kennedy as generally being a good balance for the court, both will throw the court too far off center. McCain likes the far right justices, Obama likes the far left and neither like more centrist judges.

2:57 pm on July 10, 2008 | Joined June 2008 | 22 Days Active
Join to learn more about Nippon Wolf United States | 68 Posts | 297 Points
girlygrl


Visionary
Reply
Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 9:02 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from PewPew at 8:58 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from Prince o palities at 7:57 am on July 10, 2008

Right, but Obama strikes me more as an Islamo-communist than an Islamo-fascist.
 

 How did you arrive at Communist and Islamo?


Communist cuz he's liberal, Islamo cuz of his name. Because obviously he's a Muslim.



Right because Barack Obama is SUCH an Islamic name. Even though everyone knows he isn't Muslim at all. Even if he was Muslim, I don't see what the big deal is. Don't be racist.

-------
It's funny how you think I care

6:44 pm on July 10, 2008 | Joined Feb. 2007 | 338 Days Active
Join to learn more about girlygrl New York, United States | Female | 4751 Posts | 8506 Points
GoReadAFuckingBook1


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
1.  The art of sarcasm is lost on you people, as evidenced by some of these posts.

2.  Please stop using the phrase 'lesser of two evils' and realize that there are more than 2 candidates.

3.  Barack Obama will not change much at all.  John McCain won't improve things either, but at least his title of 'conservative' merits that (even though I'm sure most actual conservatives - AKA plenty of libertarians - don't agree with that title).

4.  I think I hate most things involved with US politics, probably because of the two party system and lack of third party awareness.


12:57 am on July 11, 2008 | Joined Feb. 2008 | 149 Days Active
Join to learn more about GoReadAFuckingBook1 United States | 284 Posts | 1789 Points
Black Sheep


Visionary

Patron
Reply
Quote: from girlygrl at 9:44 pm on July 10, 2008

Quote: from gogreengeckos8D at 9:02 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from PewPew at 8:58 am on July 10, 2008

Quote: from Prince o palities at 7:57 am on July 10, 2008

Right, but Obama strikes me more as an Islamo-communist than an Islamo-fascist.

  How did you arrive at Communist and Islamo?


 

 Communist cuz he's liberal, Islamo cuz of his name. Because obviously he's a Muslim.



Right because Barack Obama is SUCH an Islamic name. Even though everyone knows he isn't Muslim at all. Even if he was Muslim, I don't see what the big deal is. Don't be racist.

"Muslim" is not a race.



-------
Agent Provocateur


9:13 pm on July 12, 2008 | Joined Aug. 2007 | 368 Days Active
Join to learn more about Black Sheep Florida, United States | Gay Male | 14110 Posts | 9443 Points
Pages: 1 2 3 4  Next » Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic