---

Quote: from Praise the Lard at 3:05 pm on July 5, 2008

---

seems like a huge fuss over a dog, on both sides

---

So they should have just allowed the dog to die in it's backyard with a chain embedded in it's neck, not helping it?

---

maybe

-------
Shoot to kill, aim to please
What good's a heart if it ain't on your sleeve?
Falling in love is a losing game
It's fun to play, but it ends the same

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:11 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from californication at 3:10 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:09 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from californication at 3:07 pm on July 5, 2008

---

I think what she did was right, but then again she could have handled it better imo. She made a site and everything over a dog. Did she talk to the owners about it, I'm sure she probably did.    
    I realize animals should be treated well and all, I love my dog, but  it was a little extensive.

---

   

   What do you mean 'she made a site over a dog'?    
   She is the founder of an organization that rescues dogs, and she had that settled long before this dog came along. Either you're mixed up, or ... I don't even know.

---

 
  She had her own site yes, and her job before that, I read the article, I realize that. But didn't it say she made a cafe press site just over that one dog?

---

 

 No, I said her supporters made products that supported her decision regarding this dog, which the judge made them take down from the Cafe Press website.

---

Well then there was a website about the one dog, regardless then right?

---

There is a page on the Dogs Deserve Better website dedicated to the case, and to Doogie. But that has nothing to do with this thread.

-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:06 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from Praise the Lard at 3:05 pm on July 5, 2008

---

seems like a huge fuss over a dog, on both sides

---

 

 So they should have just allowed the dog to die in it's backyard with a chain embedded in it's neck, not helping it?

---

maybe

---

That says a lot about the type of person you are.
Not the type of person I'd associate with. A pathetic type of person, essentially. Gandhi would be ashamed.

-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.

---

There is a page on the Dogs Deserve Better website dedicated to the case, and to Doogie. But that has nothing to do with this thread.

---

Um yes, it can relate to this thread. I was saying I think they made a big fuss over that one dog.

-------
Never wanted to dance with nobody but you--

All the Problems make me wanna go
Like a bad girl Straight to Video

---

---

There is a page on the Dogs Deserve Better website dedicated to the case, and to Doogie. But that has nothing to do with this thread.

---

Um yes, it can relate to this thread. I was saying I think they made a big fuss over that one dog.

---

And who is they? That's all you said.
Obviously, you aren't in this type of world, where this is something you see everyday, or often, at all. I don't expect you to understand. And evenso, that has nothing to do with whether or not she should have been arrested or not.
No matter what you say, them making a page on their website dedicated to a dog that they rescued that the founder of their organization went to jail for has no bearing on something that happened before the page was even made. You're failing to even make any sense.

-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.

---

That says a lot about the type of person you are.
Not the type of person I'd associate with. A pathetic type of person, essentially. Gandhi would be ashamed.

---

sorry i don't conform to your morals, but i'm a pragmatist and utilitarian.
she should have gone through the system instead of taking matters into her own hands, even if this dog ended up suffering more or dying even. the judge is being a dick (which i already said), but she should have thought the situation through more. if she hadn't done this she could be saving more animals right now by helping to create new laws that protect animals from cruelty or trying to get more enforcement of existing animal cruelty laws.
by saying "maybe" i meant that maybe the death or suffering of one animal could be justified if it means that many many more would be better off.

-------
Shoot to kill, aim to please
What good's a heart if it ain't on your sleeve?
Falling in love is a losing game
It's fun to play, but it ends the same

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:20 pm on July 5, 2008

---

That says a lot about the type of person you are.  
 Not the type of person I'd associate with. A pathetic type of person, essentially. Gandhi would be ashamed.

---

sorry i don't conform to your morals, but i'm a pragmatist and utilitarian.
she should have gone through the system instead of taking matters into her own hands, even if this dog ended up suffering more or dying even. the judge is being a dick (which i already said), but she should have thought the situation through more. if she hadn't done this she could be saving more animals right now by helping to create new laws that protect animals from cruelty or trying to get more enforcement of existing animal cruelty laws.
by saying "maybe" i meant that maybe the death or suffering of one animal could be justified if it means that many many more would be better off.

---

Actually, she is saving just as many animals right now as she was before. Nothing is holding her back.

-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.

---

Quote: from californication at 3:22 pm on July 5, 2008

---

---

There is a page on the Dogs Deserve Better website dedicated to the case, and to Doogie. But that has nothing to do with this thread.

---

 

 Um yes, it can relate to this thread. I was saying I think they made a big fuss over that one dog.

---

And who is they? That's all you said.
Obviously, you aren't in this type of world, where this is something you see everyday, or often, at all. I don't expect you to understand. And evenso, that has nothing to do with whether or not she should have been arrested or not.
No matter what you say, them making a page on their website dedicated to a dog that they rescued that the founder of their organization went to jail for has no bearing on something that happened before the page was even made. You're failing to even make any sense.

---

---

Quote: from Praise the Lard at 3:28 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:20 pm on July 5, 2008

---

That says a lot about the type of person you are.
  Not the type of person I'd associate with. A pathetic type of person, essentially. Gandhi would be ashamed.

---

 

 sorry i don't conform to your morals, but i'm a pragmatist and utilitarian.  
 she should have gone through the system instead of taking matters into her own hands, even if this dog ended up suffering more or dying even. the judge is being a dick (which i already said), but she should have thought the situation through more. if she hadn't done this she could be saving more animals right now by helping to create new laws that protect animals from cruelty or trying to get more enforcement of existing animal cruelty laws.  
 by saying "maybe" i meant that maybe the death or suffering of one animal could be justified if it means that many many more would be better off.

---

Actually, she is saving just as many animals right now as she was before. Nothing is holding her back.

---

terribly sorry that i'm not an expert on this case and assumed she was in jail, especially since the information you presented implied that

-------
Shoot to kill, aim to please
What good's a heart if it ain't on your sleeve?
Falling in love is a losing game
It's fun to play, but it ends the same

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:25 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from californication at 3:22 pm on July 5, 2008

---

---

There is a page on the Dogs Deserve Better website dedicated to the case, and to Doogie. But that has nothing to do with this thread.

---

 

  Um yes, it can relate to this thread. I was saying I think they made a big fuss over that one dog.

---

 

 And who is they? That's all you said.  
 Obviously, you aren't in this type of world, where this is something you see everyday, or often, at all. I don't expect you to understand. And evenso, that has nothing to do with whether or not she should have been arrested or not.  
 No matter what you say, them making a page on their website dedicated to a dog that they rescued that the founder of their organization went to jail for has no bearing on something that happened before the page was even made. You're failing to even make any sense.

---

lol wow you should really calm down, chill out. It's teh internetz. You don't need to act like a stuck up shit on here, you know.

---

Actually I'm perfectly calm. Thanks for your concern.
I'm merely making a point that what you're saying is incorrect, no matter how many times you quote me and repeat it. Trying to tell me 'lolz calm down in teh internet you're not important' doesn't make me any less right and you any less wrong. Sorry.

-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:29 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from Praise the Lard at 3:28 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:20 pm on July 5, 2008

---

That says a lot about the type of person you are.    
   Not the type of person I'd associate with. A pathetic type of person, essentially. Gandhi would be ashamed.

---

 

  sorry i don't conform to your morals, but i'm a pragmatist and utilitarian.  
  she should have gone through the system instead of taking matters into her own hands, even if this dog ended up suffering more or dying even. the judge is being a dick (which i already said), but she should have thought the situation through more. if she hadn't done this she could be saving more animals right now by helping to create new laws that protect animals from cruelty or trying to get more enforcement of existing animal cruelty laws.  
  by saying "maybe" i meant that maybe the death or suffering of one animal could be justified if it means that many many more would be better off.

---

 

 Actually, she is saving just as many animals right now as she was before. Nothing is holding her back.

---

terribly sorry that i'm not an expert on this case and assumed she was in jail, especially since the information you presented implied that

---

Even if she were in jail, her organization would still be there, doing what it's done since it was formed. She's gotten laws passed in lots of places, some even due to this case.
I never intended to start a thread where people could freely bash me and my beliefs as they saw fit. It was a yes or no question.

-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.

---

Okay, so she was arrested for taking the dog...sooo...what about the dog's owner? The way he/she was treating it was illegal, too, right?...

---

Nobody's ever said what happened to them.
I don't think they were ever charged with animal neglect or abuse, or anything they did. They should have been, but I don't think they were. Their dog clearly suffered greatly.

-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.

---

Quote: from californication at 3:30 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from The Raven at 12:25 pm on July 5, 2008

---

Quote: from californication at 3:22 pm on July 5, 2008

---

---

There is a page on the Dogs Deserve Better website dedicated to the case, and to Doogie. But that has nothing to do with this thread.

---

   

   Um yes, it can relate to this thread. I was saying I think they made a big fuss over that one dog.

---

 

  And who is they? That's all you said.  
  Obviously, you aren't in this type of world, where this is something you see everyday, or often, at all. I don't expect you to understand. And evenso, that has nothing to do with whether or not she should have been arrested or not.  
  No matter what you say, them making a page on their website dedicated to a dog that they rescued that the founder of their organization went to jail for has no bearing on something that happened before the page was even made. You're failing to even make any sense.

---

 
 lol wow you should really calm down, chill out. It's teh internetz. You don't need to act like a stuck up shit on here, you know.

---

Actually I'm perfectly calm. Thanks for your concern.
I'm merely making a point that what you're saying is incorrect, no matter how many times you quote me and repeat it. Trying to tell me 'lolz calm down in teh internet you're not important' doesn't make me any less right and you any less wrong. Sorry.

---