---

Quote: from cherrys77 at 6:00 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from charolastra at 2:57 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from cherrys77 at 5:55 pm on July 7, 2008

---

I don't find that to be the sad part.    

  I find it sad how easily influenced we all are.    

  Is there anyone who is just their true self? No there really isn't. Everyone has compromised something so as not to be outcast. We are all just an image.

---

  wow that was so insightful. did you come up with that yourself? that's such a novel concept.

---

 

 I've been reading this book called Immortality. And it talks about our Immortal selves. Which is basically what everyone thinks after we pass away. And i was literally crying last night reading this and i've just been thinking about how fake everything is. I keep writing about it.

---

sadly that was sarcasm, that was a very trite statement you made previously

---

My sarcasm radar is off today

-------
All general statements are untrue.

Who gives a shit?

-------
Lost 30 lbs since I started my diet, 100 away from the goal as of Nov 1.

---

Quote: from kittymunchy at 5:57 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from JeanClaude at 2:54 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from charolastra at 5:53 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from liberalsareevil at 5:48 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from hivemind at 2:46 pm on July 7, 2008

---

that just the way the world is these days....learn to live with it

---

   

  no I wont live with it. People need to understand that sex is something for after marriage, Sex is for pro creation

---

  that's a really shitty way to think about sex. are you a dog?

---

 

 Or a Catholic.  

---

y'know you shouldn't say much about Catholics being wrong for not having sex until they're maried unless you understand their reasoning behind it. i'm a Catholic, but i'm also VERY liberal.

---

I didn't say it was wrong, you're the one getting all defensive here, Defensive Davey.  

---

" Because God says so " would classify as religious conjecture.

---

Quote: from liberalsareevil at 5:44 pm on July 7, 2008

---

This is a terrible thing, people. movies show premarital sex as something cool and it should be tried. IT IS NOT GOOD!!!!! Did you know that people who have had sex before marraige have a higher divorce rate than those who didn't? Premarital sex has increased since before the time tehre were movies like this that glorify it. It will keep increasing because more and more teens are trying it from movies. Did you know 1 in 5 teenage girls has a STD? I'm pretty sure that will get higher

---

Statement of belief, audience. statement skewed by bias. REPETITION OF BELIEF IN THE HOPES THAT YELLING IT REPEATEDLY NEGATES THE NEED FOR SUPPORT!!!!! Did you know that correlational evidence isn't necesarily indicative of causation? Unsourced statement on statistics that can be ignored. Baseless supposition. Did you know another unsourced statistic? Baseless supposition.

---

Not to talk about this ridiculously old discussion of the effect that films have on people. Even during the classic period of cinema the conservatives complained about it. Not surprised that modern cinema proved them wrong. I hate when people don't learn with history.

"if you wanna talk about the movies we'll talk about the movies, if you wanna talk about real life we'll talk about real life." Quentin Tarantino

---

Can you tell me why premarital sex isn't good without resorting to religious conjecture?

" Because God says so " would classify as religious conjecture.

---

I can understand people reservedly staying away from sex until in a long term relationship. But the marriage thing is silly in my eyes, exempt from religious conjecture as stated :)

-------
tick makes me tock.

---

Can you tell me why premarital sex isn't good without resorting to religious conjecture?

" Because God says so " would classify as religious conjecture.

---

---

Quote: from JeanClaude at 3:03 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from kittymunchy at 5:57 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from JeanClaude at 2:54 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from charolastra at 5:53 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from liberalsareevil at 5:48 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Quote: from hivemind at 2:46 pm on July 7, 2008

---

that just the way the world is these days....learn to live with it

---

 

   no I wont live with it. People need to understand that sex is something for after marriage, Sex is for pro creation

---

     

  that's a really shitty way to think about sex. are you a dog?

---

 

  Or a Catholic.

---

   
 y'know you shouldn't say much about Catholics being wrong for not having sex until they're maried unless you understand their reasoning behind it. i'm a Catholic, but i'm also VERY liberal.

---

 

 I didn't say it was wrong, you're the one getting all defensive here, Defensive Davey.

---

that's b'cause what the OP says has some truth in it. there's always a reason for what a religion practices, and just because someone is Catholic doesn't mean they'll practice or believe every teaching. heck, you don't even HAVE to have a religion to refuse sex until marriage. i just didn't like what you were insinuating.

---

To be a good Catholic you do.  

-------
yiff me you ugly son of a bitch
you ugly son of a BITCH

---

Quote: from Takinam at 3:25 pm on July 7, 2008

---

Can you tell me why premarital sex isn't good without resorting to religious conjecture?  

 " Because God says so " would classify as religious conjecture.

---

the original intention of sex is to procreate, right? if you're not ready for the possible responsibilities in raising a child which include having stable finances for a home to live in, food, education, and love, then you shouldn't be risking a possibility. even if you use a condom or other contraceptive there is always a chance biologically for a pregnancy to happen. its in the best intentions for both the parents and any possible children to wait so that the children don't have to suffer from their parent's mistaken lust or impatience. it costs a lot of money to care for a child, and i've explained this from a logical, secular point of view.

---

The original intent of sex is to procreate. And the original intent of feeding to provide energy for us to survive. Yet, as humans, we usually eat much more than we need to survive and usually eat just for the mere joyous fun of it.

It is up to the two having sex to weigh the pros and cons. There is a risk I will contract of food poisoning yet I still eat. And there is a higher risk that I will gift my partner with pregnancy with with inadequate contraception. But these risks are my own to bear and not yours to judge. I can use foolproof contraception but using such contraception is usually beyond what teenagers are willing to do to avoid pregnancy. Regardless, telling me the risks that I already know won't change the fact that I will keep eating and keep having sex.