---

And they do not give YOU anything?

---

---

No they gave more as % of GNI.

In raw dollar amount the top 3 donors are US, Germany and France.

Also the countries receiving aid are not usually the poorest and Africa received just 15% of the total aid.

in the past 10 years they received even less

---

The fact still stands - sub-Saharan Africa gets more aid than any other people.

---

The fact though is that YOU are not Swedish or Norwegian and you have never lived there yet so it is funny how you try to get credit for what they do there.

---

"Sweden and Norway - being almost solely White..."

I was saying WHITES did it.

Whites helping Whites and Blacks helping Blacks is, in my opinion, a better way.

-------
"One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the
woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents...
occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik,
Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"

---

---

And they do not give YOU anything?

---

Nope.

---

No they gave more as % of GNI.

In raw dollar amount the top 3 donors are US, Germany and France.

Also the countries receiving aid are not usually the poorest and Africa received just 15% of the total aid.  

in the past 10 years they received even less

---

It doesn't matter what percent as much - but how much. In some African countries it accounts for 10% of the nations GDP and 1/2 of the governments budget.

The fact still stands - sub-Saharan Africa gets more aid than any other people.

---

The fact though is that YOU are not Swedish or Norwegian and you have never lived there yet so it is funny how you try to get credit for what they do there.

---

Did I say I did it?

"Sweden and Norway - being almost solely White..."

I was saying WHITES did it.

Whites helping Whites and Blacks helping Blacks is, in my opinion, a better way.

---

People should help each other regardless of race. Your plan just sets the world up for failure =/

-------
"When you do things right.
People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud

---

Haiti supplied France and 1/2 of Europe with materials

---

But it's true that whites did give Native Americans smallpox. Without them they would have never known it!

---

Well, many banished them from their land (Haiti and I think India did too).

---

England became a rich and powerful industrial nation thanks to all the raw material and armies built from Indian land and Indian people.

---

And Whites built infrastructure and gave them technology.

---

---

But, then again, it's good proof of what happens when others come to your territory.

---

---

 They are constantly warring each other and fighting in tribes.

---

---

If Whites never intervened - they would STILL be doing that - but with spears instead of guns.

---

And its funny how whites encouraged Africans to be peaceful during WWI and WWII.

Italian African colonies and German African colonies, French African colonies, British African colonies were all involved pitting tribes vs tribes in North Africa, East Africa, West Africa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Dakar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Gabon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_African_Campaign_(World_War_II)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Africa_Campaign_(World_War_II)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterranean_Theatre_of_World_War_II

Oh yeah that was SO MUCH better...:rolloeyes:

---

They really aren't doing much. Their leaders don't give a shit - because they know it's either being a leader or being in a tribe killing others.

---

---

When South Africa came under Black rule .

---

-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP

---

People should help each other regardless of race. Your plan just sets the world up for failure =/

---

Who's going to pay for Africa? Blacks sure as hell aren't!

---

Haiti is not in Africa.

But it's true that whites did give Native Americans smallpox. Without them they would have never known it!

---

And they wouldn't have had anything past basic literacy or guns or horses either!

---

After suffering years of colonization and exploitaion.

England became a rich and powerful industrial nation thanks to all the raw material and armies built from Indian land and Indian people.

---

India would be (almost) as shitty as sub-Saharan Africa if it wasn't for the infrastructure, technology, and understanding the English gave them.

But, I don't approve of what they did and they should have stayed in their own lands.
Too late now - but at least the Indian people still exist.

---

Because the Taj Mahal would not have been built without the British?

---

The White British built railway lines, telegraph wires, bridges, roads, irrigation systems and postal services and masses of other essential infrastructures on the sub-continent. The British forbade the practice of suteem (in which widows burned themselves alive on the funeral pyres of their deceased husbands); and the practices of killing female children and slavery. They also created the first Indian police force, with one of their most famous successes being the breaking up of a vicious criminal mafia type gang known as the Thuggee (hence the English word thug); and the British also built the first schools in India.

---

Sure immigrants can be a good thing...

---

---

Like the guys in Kosovo and Serbia. Yeah true.

---

---

Which is less deadly. But of course whites would not have guns without the Chinese. So blame the Chinese.

---

The first written reference to gunpowder - and how to make it - appears in the writings of the 13th century English monk Roger Bacon, belying the oft held theory that it was developed in China and exported to Europe.

In fact, the Chinese had what they called "fire powder" - an inflammable chemical which they used in bamboo tubes to make clay pellet firing 'rockets."

A 14th Century German monk, Berthold Schwarz, was the first person to use gunpowder to fire a substantial projectile, and can rightly be given the title of inventor of the firearm.

---

And its funny how whites encouraged Africans to be peaceful during WWI and WWII.

Italian African colonies and German African colonies, French African colonies, British African colonies were all involved pitting tribes vs tribes in North Africa, East Africa, West Africa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Dakar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Gabon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_African_Campaign_(World_War_II)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Africa_Campaign_(World_War_II)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterranean_Theatre_of_World_War_II

Oh yeah that was SO MUCH better...:rolloeyes:

---

Tribal warfare always has - and maybe always will happen in Africa.

Whites instigating shouldn't be blamed on what Negroes do all the time.

---

Mostly thanks to all the puppet governments put there by the colonists messing up the whole situation,

---

They can elect their own damn leaders - in many countries Whites didn't do anything.

Ethiopia has been European-free for a while - it's doing so well :D

---

Still trying to "prove" that blacks can't be good leaders of a nation while claiming not to be racist..lol.

---

---

---

People should help each other regardless of race. Your plan just sets the world up for failure =/

---

What if Whites die out?

Who's going to pay for Africa? Blacks sure as hell aren't!

---

Haiti is not in Africa.

But it's true that whites did give Native Americans smallpox. Without them they would have never known it!

---

Haiti was home to many Blacks brought by Europeans.

And they wouldn't have had anything past basic literacy or guns or horses either!

---

After suffering years of colonization and exploitaion.

England became a rich and powerful industrial nation thanks to all the raw material and armies built from Indian land and Indian people.

---

It was mostly from the trade with India - but you can't say that India is a 2nd world country not because of Britain.

India would be (almost) as shitty as sub-Saharan Africa if it wasn't for the infrastructure, technology, and understanding the English gave them.

 
But, I don't approve of what they did and they should have stayed in their own lands.
Too late now - but at least the Indian people still exist.

---

Because the Taj Mahal would not have been built without the British?

---

That's infrastructure? And the Portuguese and reached India in 1498. De Gama established friendly relations with the local Indian ruler, and secured a monopoly of Indian trade for Portugal which lasted for a century.

The White British built railway lines, telegraph wires, bridges, roads, irrigation systems and postal services and masses of other essential infrastructures on the sub-continent. The British forbade the practice of suteem (in which widows burned themselves alive on the funeral pyres of their deceased husbands); and the practices of killing female children and slavery. They also created the first Indian police force, with one of their most famous successes being the breaking up of a vicious criminal mafia type gang known as the Thuggee (hence the English word thug); and the British also built the first schools in India.  

---

Sure immigrants can be a good thing...

---

I like the word "Can" which proves that it's not always true.

---

Like the guys in Kosovo and Serbia. Yeah true.

---

Do you know what "Tribes" are?
And Kosovo and Serbia aren't really White.
Serbia has a large Ottoman (nonWhite) influence, Kosovo even more so.

---

Which is less deadly. But of course whites would not have guns without the Chinese. So blame the Chinese.

---

How do you come by that?

The first written reference to gunpowder - and how to make it - appears in the writings of the 13th century English monk Roger Bacon, belying the oft held theory that it was developed in China and exported to Europe.

In fact, the Chinese had what they called "fire powder" - an inflammable chemical which they used in bamboo tubes to make clay pellet firing 'rockets."

A 14th Century German monk, Berthold Schwarz, was the first person to use gunpowder to fire a substantial projectile, and can rightly be given the title of inventor of the firearm.  

---

And its funny how whites encouraged Africans to be peaceful during WWI and WWII.

Italian African colonies and German African colonies, French African colonies, British African colonies were all involved pitting tribes vs tribes in North Africa, East Africa, West Africa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Dakar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Gabon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_African_Campaign_(World_War_II)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Africa_Campaign_(World_War_II)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterranean_Theatre_of_World_War_II

Oh yeah that was SO MUCH better...:rolloeyes:

---

Why haven't they stopped now?

Tribal warfare always has - and maybe always will happen in Africa.

Whites instigating shouldn't be blamed on what Negroes do all the time.

---

Mostly thanks to all the puppet governments put there by the colonists messing up the whole situation,

---

Oh, it's the Whites fault.

They can elect their own damn leaders - in many countries Whites didn't do anything.

Ethiopia has been European-free for a while - it's doing so well :D

---

Still trying to "prove" that blacks can't be good leaders of a nation while claiming not to be racist..lol.

---

I didn't say Blacks can't be good leaders - but the leader of SA (Who happens to be Black) isn't that great of a leader.

---

What makes you think only white people are capable of helping Africa? So If the races mixed your saying that help will no longer go to Africa just because the people are not " fully white" anymore? What you just said was basically " If whites die out there will be no other race of people to help Africa" as if white people have something other people don't? The dying out of the white race has nothing to do with the help Africa gets. If all those white people decided to mix with Black Americans you think motives would change? " Oh I'm no longer fully white so that means I no longer have he means to help Africa" What the heck? Do you need to start paying attention to what you type.

-------
"When you do things right.
People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud

---

What makes you think only white people are capable of helping Africa?

---

---

So If the races mixed your saying that help will no longer go to Africa just because the people are not " fully white" anymore?

---

---

What you just said was basically " If whites die out there will be no other race of people to help Africa" as if white people have something other people don't?

---

Other money makers (East Asians) are more centered towards themselves.

They don't let immigrants swarm their countries and take over their culture, and I greatly respect them for that.

---

The dying out of the white race has nothing to do with the help Africa gets. If all those white people decided to mix with Black Americans you think motives would change? " Oh I'm no longer fully white so that means I no longer have he means to help Africa" What the heck? Do you need to start paying attention to what you type.

---

Whites don't help Africans because they're White - but because they think it's right.

Many times it's church related too.

They donate money to Africa to help children and countries that aren't really improving at all.

I'm sure some Blacks do it - but do you think more Blacks are contributing money than Whites? I sure as hell don't.

-------
"One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the
woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents...
occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik,
Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"

---

---

What makes you think only white people are capable of helping Africa?

---

Nothing - why haven't others done so as much as Whites?

---

So If the races mixed your saying that help will no longer go to Africa just because the people are not " fully white" anymore?

---

I can think of things 100x worse if races all mixed.

---

What you just said was basically " If whites die out there will be no other race of people to help Africa" as if white people have something other people don't?

---

Whites tend to help Africans more than others.
Do you deny this?

Other money makers (East Asians) are more centered towards themselves.

They don't let immigrants swarm their countries and take over their culture, and I greatly respect them for that.

---

The dying out of the white race has nothing to do with the help Africa gets. If all those white people decided to mix with Black Americans you think motives would change? " Oh I'm no longer fully white so that means I no longer have he means to help Africa" What the heck? Do you need to start paying attention to what you type.

---

I think it's more than what you're saying.

Whites don't help Africans because they're White - but because they think it's right.

Many times it's church related too.

They donate money to Africa to help children and countries that aren't really improving at all.

I'm sure some Blacks do it - but do you think more Blacks are contributing money than Whites? I sure as hell don't.

---

And what would make you think blacks don't donate? More statistics crap of yours? So your positive that if your skin isn't white, you don't give a shit about Africa? What makes you think there aren't any black people there to help in Africa? Just your assumptions on what little you know? Looking at your other comment, your saying that if your black, you won't think it is right to help Africans? I know many many (More than 20) who think Africa should get more help and that white people should stop colonizing and living off of those diamonds. I am sure an African would help just as much. Someones heart in what they think is right isn't based on race. You categorize people based on their race so much and then you try to go back on it.

-------
"When you do things right.
People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud

---

And what would make you think blacks don't donate? More statistics crap of yours?

---

I did say "I'm sure some Blacks do it..."

---

So your positive that if your skin isn't white, you don't give a shit about Africa?

---

Next time - don't use skin as race.

---

What makes you think there aren't any black people there to help in Africa? Just your assumptions on what little you know?

---

But are you saying Blacks contribute MORE than Whites to African aid?

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_eco_aid_don_percap-economic-aid-donor-per-capita" target="_top">http://http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_eco_aid_don_percap-economic-aid-donor-per-capita

Top countries:
Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands.

How much of the population do Blacks make up?

Japan itself gives $8,900,000,000.00 - with NO Blacks.

---

I know many many (More than 20) who think Africa should get more help and that white people should stop colonizing and living off of those diamonds.

---

Italy pays "Reparations" to I think Libya.

In reality - they don't want any more immigrants - and are trying to improve the country.

---

I am sure an African would help just as much. Someones heart in what they think is right isn't based on race.

---

---

You categorize people based on their race so much and then you try to go back on it.

---

I said that Whites give more than they get to Africans. That's true economic wise.

I think it's great that we're helping others - but people are dying of poverty in many countries, yes they are STILL GIVING FOREIGN AID.

The USA can greatly improve it's schooling and whatnot - but it feels the need to GIVE it's money away.

-------
"One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the
woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents...
occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik,
Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"

---

---

And what would make you think blacks don't donate? More statistics crap of yours?

---

The countries - many of them that are the top donating don't have many Blacks.

I did say "I'm sure some Blacks do it..."

---

So your positive that if your skin isn't white, you don't give a shit about Africa?

---

The whole "Skin isn't White" argument is so stupid I'm not going to address it.

Next time - don't use skin as race.

---

What makes you think there aren't any black people there to help in Africa? Just your assumptions on what little you know?

---

Nothing - which is WHY I don't think that.

But are you saying Blacks contribute MORE than Whites to African aid?

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_eco_aid_don_percap-economic-aid-donor-per-capita" target="_top">http://http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_eco_aid_don_percap-economic-aid-donor-per-capita

Top countries:
Luxembourg, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands.

How much of the population do Blacks make up?

Japan itself gives $8,900,000,000.00 - with NO Blacks.

---

I know many many (More than 20) who think Africa should get more help and that white people should stop colonizing and living off of those diamonds.

---

They aren't really anymore.

Italy pays "Reparations" to I think Libya.

In reality - they don't want any more immigrants - and are trying to improve the country.

---

I am sure an African would help just as much. Someones heart in what they think is right isn't based on race.

---

Africans are the ones that need help.

---

You categorize people based on their race so much and then you try to go back on it.

---

No, sir.

I said that Whites give more than they get to Africans. That's true economic wise.

I think it's great that we're helping others - but people are dying of poverty in many countries, yes they are STILL GIVING FOREIGN AID.

The USA can greatly improve it's schooling and whatnot - but it feels the need to GIVE it's money away.

---

No no no. You notice that whites have all the money right? I am not saying that blacks give more than whites but your trying to say that without the preservation of the white race there wouldn't be the will to donate. Don't try to go back on that. Exactly, the whole skin issue is stupid which is why it is stupid of you to say that if the white gene dies there wouldn't be no one to help Africa. there are blacks that donate to Africa in churches. You do realize that there are a lot of black countries that are poor. the last answer to the last quote is just despicable of you to say. What can Africans give? It's like Jake Long said about whites colonizing and taking riches from Africa that belong to the people. Really White people are living off of that stuff and yes White people are also helping but you can't judge Africans for not being able to give. As for U.S.A improving it's schooling, If the U.S.A didn't spend all it's money and taxes on Atomic Bombs and giving corporations bailouts then it would have money for schooling. The U.S.A does itself in from it's own greed. If the U.S.A actually cared about people, they would do a lot more to help Africa. Don't talk as if Africans pretty much owe you for helping them while white people at the same time live off of those riches and colonize there.

-------
"When you do things right.
People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud

---

No no no. You notice that whites have all the money right? I am not saying that blacks give more than whites but your trying to say that without the preservation of the white race there wouldn't be the will to donate. Don't try to go back on that.

---

---

Exactly, the whole skin issue is stupid which is why it is stupid of you to say that if the white gene dies there wouldn't be no one to help Africa.

---

If you mean RACE issues - then that's a different story.

---

there are blacks that donate to Africa in churches. You do realize that there are a lot of black countries that are poor.

---

---

the last answer to the last quote is just despicable of you to say. What can Africans give? It's like Jake Long said about whites colonizing and taking riches from Africa that belong to the people. Really White people are living off of that stuff and yes White people are also helping but you can't judge Africans for not being able to give.

---

Not a written language, method of measurement, roads, bridges, cloth, calendars, plows, railways, ships, or even the wheel!

We took resources, I'm not denying this - but Africa STILL accounts for 1-2% of world trade - they have A LOT more than that.

You're opposed to people taking advantage of other races - as am I.
That's why if they STAYED IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES we wouldn't have this problem.

---

As for U.S.A improving it's schooling, If the U.S.A didn't spend all it's money and taxes on Atomic Bombs and giving corporations bailouts then it would have money for schooling.

---

---

The Urban Institute estimates that the cost of educating illegal alien children in the nation's seven states with the highest concentration of illegal aliens was $3.1 billion in 1993 (which, with the growth of their population to 1.3 million, was more than $5 billion in 2000). This estimate does not take into account the additional costs of bilingual education or other special educational needs.

---

---

The Carrying Capacity Network, a non-profit group that studies growth and environmental issues, estimated in 1994 that legal and illegal immigrants have cost Florida $3.3 billion since 1970.

---

---

The U.S.A does itself in from it's own greed. If the U.S.A actually cared about people, they would do a lot more to help Africa.

---

Sure, we may have taken from you in the past - but Africans have so much now. They are past the stone and and have launched a rocket (even if it was really the Chinese on African soil).

---

Don't talk as if Africans pretty much owe you for helping them while white people at the same time live off of those riches and colonize there.

---

---

---

No no no. You notice that whites have all the money right? I am not saying that blacks give more than whites but your trying to say that without the preservation of the white race there wouldn't be the will to donate. Don't try to go back on that.

---

I didn't mean it like that...

---

Exactly, the whole skin issue is stupid which is why it is stupid of you to say that if the white gene dies there wouldn't be no one to help Africa.

---

What skin issue? There isn't any skin issue anywhere except for with the sun and sun burning.

If you mean RACE issues - then that's a different story.

---

there are blacks that donate to Africa in churches. You do realize that there are a lot of black countries that are poor.

---

Yes.

---

the last answer to the last quote is just despicable of you to say. What can Africans give? It's like Jake Long said about whites colonizing and taking riches from Africa that belong to the people. Really White people are living off of that stuff and yes White people are also helping but you can't judge Africans for not being able to give.

---

Before Whites came - they didn't have anything anyway!

Not a written language, method of measurement, roads, bridges, cloth, calendars, plows, railways, ships, or even the wheel!

We took resources, I'm not denying this - but Africa STILL accounts for 1-2% of world trade - they have A LOT more than that.

You're opposed to people taking advantage of other races - as am I.
That's why if they STAYED IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES we wouldn't have this problem.

---

As for U.S.A improving it's schooling, If the U.S.A didn't spend all it's money and taxes on Atomic Bombs and giving corporations bailouts then it would have money for schooling.

---

And minorities.
http://www.immigrationcounters.com" target="_top">http://http://www.immigrationcounters.com

---

The Urban Institute estimates that the cost of educating illegal alien children in the nation's seven states with the highest concentration of illegal aliens was $3.1 billion in 1993 (which, with the growth of their population to 1.3 million, was more than $5 billion in 2000). This estimate does not take into account the additional costs of bilingual education or other special educational needs.

---

Economic costs of legal and illegal immigration, Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform - http://farius.org" target="_top">http://http://farius.org

---

The Carrying Capacity Network, a non-profit group that studies growth and environmental issues, estimated in 1994 that legal and illegal immigrants have cost Florida $3.3 billion since 1970.

---

Reuters, Florida to deport criminal illegal immigrants, 1994
The funny thing is - the people who presented this information got shut down:
http://groundwork.ucsd.edu/burn/" target="_top">http://http://groundwork.ucsd.edu/burn/

 

---

The U.S.A does itself in from it's own greed. If the U.S.A actually cared about people, they would do a lot more to help Africa.

---

NO!
Africa has proven to not give a flying fuck about its own people - why should the USA?
The USA has its own problems - why fix others?

Sure, we may have taken from you in the past - but Africans have so much now. They are past the stone and and have launched a rocket (even if it was really the Chinese on African soil).

---

Don't talk as if Africans pretty much owe you for helping them while white people at the same time live off of those riches and colonize there.

---

I owe them nothing and they owe me nothing.

---

If you didn't mean it like that you shouldn't have said it like that. The second quote accompanies the first.

Lets see before whites came there wasn't "Not a written language, method of measurement, roads, bridges, cloth, calendars, plows, railways, ships, or even the wheel!"

You really need to go to the library.........

lets see why should the U.S.A care about Africa?

Well I do recall you say they do it because it's the right thing to do did you not?

-------
"When you do things right.
People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud

We are talking how HOW WE CAN PROMOTE TRUE EQUALITY.

THAT IS THE TOPIC.

Stop veering our topics into the same debates over and over again.

Go promote your separation shit elsewhere, rune, because that is a direct contention to improving ourselves. And by us, I mean, everyone.

---

I am tired of this off-topic banter. This is a subject on how we can improve perceived racial equality, NOT a debate on what kidd_rune's ideology is. I don't CARE if rune believes in race because I believe that "race" is equivalent to skin color and it doesn't make any significant difference in human behaviour. As such, it is not important. And the Swedes (this speaks to me, I won't say why) or the Nords, or whomever, these are all accomplishments of humanity. That is my opinion, but damnit, even that is not ON-TOPIC.  

We are talking how HOW WE CAN PROMOTE TRUE EQUALITY.  

THAT IS THE TOPIC.  

Stop veering our topics into the same debates over and over again.  

Go promote your separation shit elsewhere, rune, because that is a direct contention to improving ourselves. And by us, I mean, everyone.

---

And kidd Rune thinks segregated continents are the answer.

Post edited at 8:04 pm on Nov. 26, 2008 by Moonscar

-------
"When you do things right.
People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud

---

Quote: from Takinam at 8:01 pm on Nov. 26, 2008

---

I am tired of this off-topic banter. This is a subject on how we can improve perceived racial equality, NOT a debate on what kidd_rune's ideology is. I don't CARE if rune believes in race because I believe that "race" is equivalent to skin color and it doesn't make any significant difference in human behaviour. As such, it is not important. And the Swedes (this speaks to me, I won't say why) or the Nords, or whomever, these are all accomplishments of humanity. That is my opinion, but damnit, even that is not ON-TOPIC.

We are talking how HOW WE CAN PROMOTE TRUE EQUALITY.

THAT IS THE TOPIC.

Stop veering our topics into the same debates over and over again.

Go promote your separation shit elsewhere, rune, because that is a direct contention to improving ourselves. And by us, I mean, everyone.

---

And kidd Rune thinks segregated continents are the answer.

---

I know, I know.

But the segregated continent answer just leads to off-topic debate. Someone say.."That is not the answer and this is why.., etc ". But stop there. We don't have to go into why the Ghanaians plant fields of corns in the winter. It is unnecessary.

---

Quote: from Moonscar at 8:04 pm on Nov. 26, 2008

---

Quote: from Takinam at 8:01 pm on Nov. 26, 2008

---

I am tired of this off-topic banter. This is a subject on how we can improve perceived racial equality, NOT a debate on what kidd_rune's ideology is. I don't CARE if rune believes in race because I believe that "race" is equivalent to skin color and it doesn't make any significant difference in human behaviour. As such, it is not important. And the Swedes (this speaks to me, I won't say why) or the Nords, or whomever, these are all accomplishments of humanity. That is my opinion, but damnit, even that is not ON-TOPIC.    

 We are talking how HOW WE CAN PROMOTE TRUE EQUALITY.    

 THAT IS THE TOPIC.    

 Stop veering our topics into the same debates over and over again.    

 Go promote your separation shit elsewhere, rune, because that is a direct contention to improving ourselves. And by us, I mean, everyone.

---

 

 And kidd Rune thinks segregated continents are the answer.

---

I know, I know.

But the segregated continent answer just leads to off-topic debate. Someone say.."That is not the answer and this is why.., etc ". But stop there. We don't have to go into why the Ghanaians plant fields of corns in the winter. It is unnecessary.

---

Well we probably won't get on topic as long as Kidd Rune has a voice in the Race,Ethnicity & Nationality forums............

-------
"When you do things right.
People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud