That would certainly protect the institution of marriage.  And, it would make sure the children had both of their parents around.  Think of the children.

So, would you support banning divorce altogether?  Yes or no?

-------
┌─┐
┴─┴
ಠ_ರೃ

http://daytonward.livejournal.com/260575.html?view=911071#t911071

-------
i want to have my cake and eat it too :l

---

marriage needs to be taken more seriously

---

Limiting it to a man and a woman is clearly the way to accomplish this.  Those homosexuals are far too giddy and irrational to take something like marriage seriously.

---

Quote: from gronk at 12:15 am on Nov. 18, 2008

---

marriage needs to be taken more seriously

---

Limiting it to a man and a woman is clearly the way to accomplish this. Those homosexuals are far too giddy and irrational to take something like marriage seriously.

---

thats a bit of a generalization

I know statistically homos are more likely to be promiscuious.
on average they have 4 times as many sexual partners as heteros

-------
Goodbye LW! 2 things to leave you with- 1 the points dont matter
2. There should be able to have topics within groups

---

Quote: from greatescape11 at 5:18 pm on Nov. 18, 2008

---

Quote: from gronk at 12:15 am on Nov. 18, 2008

---

marriage needs to be taken more seriously

---

 

 Limiting it to a man and a woman is clearly the way to accomplish this.  Those homosexuals are far too giddy and irrational to take something like marriage seriously.  

 

---

thats a bit of a generalization

I know statistically homos are more likely to be promiscuious.
on average they have 4 times as many sexual partners as heteros

---

They don't have to marry everyone they fuck.

---

Aw look, Baron poses a REAL question!

---

You know how those gays get about their rights

-------
I'm watching you.

Post edited at 10:29 pm on Nov. 17, 2008 by sykexl

---

Quote: from gronk at 10:23 pm on Nov. 17, 2008

---

Quote: from greatescape11 at 5:18 pm on Nov. 18, 2008

---

Quote: from gronk at 12:15 am on Nov. 18, 2008

---

marriage needs to be taken more seriously

---

  Limiting it to a man and a woman is clearly the way to accomplish this. Those homosexuals are far too giddy and irrational to take something like marriage seriously.

 

---

 

 thats a bit of a generalization  

 I know statistically homos are more likely to be promiscuious.  
 on average they have 4 times as many sexual partners as heteros

---

They don't have to marry everyone they fuck.

---

I was not being sarcastic at all.

---

Ban gay marriage? Sorry buddy, the legalization of it in the first place was unconstitutional. I personally don't care one way or the other myself but that fact remains very much true.

---

Please explain how the legalization was unconstitutional.

---

Quote: from gronk at 10:23 pm on Nov. 17, 2008

---

Quote: from greatescape11 at 5:18 pm on Nov. 18, 2008

---

Quote: from gronk at 12:15 am on Nov. 18, 2008

---

marriage needs to be taken more seriously

---

  Limiting it to a man and a woman is clearly the way to accomplish this. Those homosexuals are far too giddy and irrational to take something like marriage seriously.

 

---

 

 thats a bit of a generalization  

 I know statistically homos are more likely to be promiscuious.  
 on average they have 4 times as many sexual partners as heteros

---

They don't have to marry everyone they fuck.

---

no but marriage is meant to be about  monogomy, people who are sexually promiscious, shouldnt get married if they cant commit to one.

I have no tolerance for adultery, nor should anyone else

-------
Goodbye LW! 2 things to leave you with- 1 the points dont matter
2. There should be able to have topics within groups