|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
| Choice |
Votes |
Percent |
|
| Yes. |
8 |
17% |
|
| No. I only want to protect marriage by taking away other people's rights. Not my own. |
2 |
4% |
|
| I'm not an idiot, so I'm not in favor of banning either one. |
37 |
78% |
|
| Vote Now! |
47 Votes Cast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
Forever Angel
Pectus Pectoris Memor
 Sustainer
|
     
Quote: from Squishy at 8:50 am on Nov. 18, 2008
 I think if everyone is "equal" then everyone should have the same rights.
What "rights" are not the same?
-------
"God does not play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God does play dice" - Stephen Hawking
Bohica
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seafercat
Guru
 Patron
|
Quote: from gronk at 2:46 am on Nov. 19, 2008
Quote: from Seafercat at 6:21 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from gronk at 7:47 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from tell me again at 5:25 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from gronk at 10:23 pm on Nov. 17, 2008
Quote: from greatescape11 at 5:18 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from gronk at 12:15 am on Nov. 18, 2008
marriage needs to be taken more seriously
Limiting it to a man and a woman is clearly the way to accomplish this. Those homosexuals are far too giddy and irrational to take something like marriage seriously.
thats a bit of a generalization I know statistically homos are more likely to be promiscuous.
on average they have 4 times as many sexual partners as heteros
They don't have to marry everyone they fuck.
no but marriage is meant to be about monogomy, people who are sexually promiscuous, shouldnt get married if they cant commit to one. I have no tolerance for adultery, nor should anyone else
yeah someone who is casually promiscuous certainly couldn't ever commit...
say, i hear females in new zealand are the most promiscuous than any other female in
the world, ban marriage in NZ?????????
stop committing the straw person fallacy
stop bringing up irrelevant "facts"
|
|
|
bstodge
Visionary
Patron
|
I'm not an idiot, so I'm not in favor of banning either one.
-------
So?
|
1:40 pm on Nov. 18, 2008 | Joined: April 2008 | Days Active: 298
Join to learn more about bstodge Minnesota, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 4,480 | Points: 9,064
|
|
| |
|
|
Seafercat
Guru
Patron
|
well, i'm not an idiot and i'm in favour of banning marriage as a legally binding contract
|
|
|
|
Post from this position was omitted due to content violations
|
|
|
gronk
Soothsayer
|
Quote: from Seafercat at 8:36 am on Nov. 19, 2008
Quote: from gronk at 2:46 am on Nov. 19, 2008
Quote: from Seafercat at 6:21 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from gronk at 7:47 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from tell me again at 5:25 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from gronk at 10:23 pm on Nov. 17, 2008
Quote: from greatescape11 at 5:18 pm on Nov. 18, 2008
Quote: from gronk at 12:15 am on Nov. 18, 2008
marriage needs to be taken more seriously
Limiting it to a man and a woman is clearly the way to accomplish this. Those homosexuals are far too giddy and irrational to take something like marriage seriously.
thats a bit of a generalization I know statistically homos are more likely to be promiscuous.
on average they have 4 times as many sexual partners as heteros
They don't have to marry everyone they fuck.
no but marriage is meant to be about monogomy, people who are sexually promiscuous, shouldnt get married if they cant commit to one. I have no tolerance for adultery, nor should anyone else
yeah someone who is casually promiscuous certainly couldn't ever commit...
say, i hear females in new zealand are the most promiscuous than any other female in
the world, ban marriage in NZ?????????
stop committing the straw person fallacy
stop bringing up irrelevant "facts"
fair enough, although greatescape first brought it up
-------
Goodbye LW! 2 things to leave you with- 1 the points dont matter
2. There should be able to have topics within groups
|
4:29 pm on Nov. 18, 2008 | Joined: Oct. 2004 | Days Active: 792
Join to learn more about gronk Australia | Straight Male | Posts: 5,249 | Points: 13,740
|
|
| |
|
|
football
Executive
Patron
|
Not just a blank ban on divorce, but yes, I would fully support banning of divorce in cases where somebody was just irresponsible and foolish and married before they were ready. I'm tired of our society telling people they don't have to take responsibility for their actions.
|
8:51 pm on Nov. 18, 2008 | Joined: Mar. 2005 | Days Active: 243
Join to learn more about football Colorado, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,901 | Points: 3,878
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
football
Executive
Patron
|
Quote: from runthespread at 9:29 pm on Nov. 19, 2008
Quote: from Savior at 10:12 pm on Nov. 17, 2008
Sure would!
You answer as if there are no possible domino effects. 50% divorce rate; those couples suddenly forced to stay married would lead to even more unfaithfulness, more unhappiness, more substance abuse, more psychological needs, more intoxicated driving, more abuse, more murders, etc. To imprison a person through the take away of rights is not always a good thing, even if it is following a religion.
Heaven forbid it lead to people taking more time to make sound, responsible decisions when it comes to getting married.
|
11:02 am on Nov. 19, 2008 | Joined: Mar. 2005 | Days Active: 243
Join to learn more about football Colorado, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,901 | Points: 3,878
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| / / / Viewing Topic | |
|
848 users online 
222846 members 
You have 1 new message.
