He made a topic about valium in the drug forum, i replied and then was sent a solicitation message from him, trying to sell me valium via the internet.

We spoke in AIM, and he was completely serious, and showed me his account on an underground drug trafficing site (need referal to join, not indexed by any searches, first rule of fight club is you dont talk about fight club kinda shit) and offered to send a sample (the product was soposodly pure powder, which you can only get in mexico or from a super qualified pharmacist so a sample to show the purity he said would be necesary)

I documented and reported all and the moderator who handled it gave him a warning.  This guy could send a little kid on here a dose of valium (a powerful benzodiazapine) which is strong enough to make the 90 lb kid black out for 5 hours, basically having no conscious thought about anything but still doing stuff and not being able to remember any of it)

The mod who saw it only issued him a warning.

This could literally destroy a kids life.

I don't think there is a choice to be made here.  We can't be hosting an online drug exchange.  There are serious moral issues here.  It would be wrong to allow this to keep happening.

I am making this topic to see if all the mods agree with the one who handled the case.  I thought though that a great percentage of mods would agree further action should be taken, so I am presenting it to all of you.

i'm pretty sure he only tried to sell it to people who were versed in its use, not little kids.

regardless, i get it for cheaper than he was  offering so i said no thanks.

-------
#igloos chat

Link?

-------
Must I prove to you how good we are together?

---

valium doesn't destroy people's lives.

i'm pretty sure he only tried to sell it to people who were versed in its use, not little kids.

regardless, i get it for cheaper than he was offering so i said no thanks.

---

*^* this *^*

-------
~5 points a week for your ad here~
JOIN THE GAME
Giving points away! PM me to get them!

and why report people?

Post edited at 7:36 pm on Jan. 8, 2009 by r o c 2

-------
if your reading this you owe me 5 points

Informal warning > Warning > Ban

-------
"A wise girl kisses but doesn't love,
listens but doesn't believe,
and leaves before she is left"
-Marilyn Monroe

We have exceptions to the process in extreme cases. Such as when it involves such an obvious legal issue.

-------
kid, I wrote back,
all lovers betray.

---

lol valiums are not powerful,i think xans,vic's,perc's, and oxy's are way stronger

 
and why report people?

---

Valium is a benzodiazapine.  A strong enough dose of ANY benzodiazapine can have people unwillingly walking off bridges, falling on impaling objects, if guns are around i don't even want to think of the possibilities.

You are obviously not versed in drugs because you compare this benzo to opiates.  Apples and oranges, my friend.

Quote: from OverTheAir at 8:29 pm on Jan. 8, 2009

---

We have this process that we follow...

Informal warning > Warning > Ban

---

---

Due process.

---

This system is complete crap, no offense.  Due process means giving a fair trial and appeal opportunities and a lawyer if you cant afford one etc.  It DOES NOT mean that the defendant in every case should be given the same sentence.  A traffic offense deserves a warning the first two times.  A murder deserves life.

I don't care if you have due process policies.  Give me one reason, other than a policy that was meant to control misbehavior and not drug dealing, that this member should be allowed to stay on LW