|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
why are africans the most hated minority?  |
|
|
|
Replies: 85 Last Post Jan. 30 7:51pm by imatwirp
|
|
|
|
|
Web Resources: Suicide Myths Dispelled, Suicide Information
USA Suicide Hotline: 1-800-SUICIDE (1-800-784-2433)
|
kidd rune
Enlightened One
Patron
|
How many do you know really? 
Seven billion. Pretty much the whole Black part of my school. I do usually hang out with Blacks more than Whites or Hispanics at my school...
Well the US gave that up when it decided to colonize Puerto Rico. Sorry but thats what happens when you colonize non-white territory: you end up with a lot of nonwhites around... 
They didn't expect that. And you can't say they did. Puerto Ricans are considered White Hispanic unless they specify otherwise anyway.
Show where there is a "why?" or even a question in the first part. 
There doesn't need to be one. I was replying to it. Not answering it (Because it wasn't a question). You could also say I was clarifying or adding to it.
Other than the fact that you justify or defend most of the issues we talk about on what he did? Other than the fact that you keep asking "what is wrong with Hitler" or what is wrong with nazism?" 
Most of what you find about him is lies. It's called propaganda and it's funny how any NSDAP propaganda is dismissed as propaganda - but not anti-NSDAP propaganda. Someone tried to pretty much take it to the grave with them that Hitler had brown eyes and black hair! It was quite hilarious. Anyway - I don't really ask those questions. I rarely ask what's wrong with Hitler because I just expect to get a list of lies. But when I ask what's wrong with National Socialism you NEVER answer. EVER. You just relate it to your views on Nazism.
it is no longer an assumption when it has been problem and demostrated many times from your posts, your profile and your image basket. 
Oh, and those are an accurate representation of my life? Lol...
The only way I know about you is through your posts yeah,. I can only know you through the image you give here. If you don't want ppl to think you fit that image then stop making the posts you make. 
But I don't use my posts as an accurate representation of my life. And you would be an idiot to do so.
If I don't want ppl to think I am mixed o that I believe that race is not that important then I wouldn't advertise it here. Otherwsise you just reap what you sow. 
I didn't think people would base you off of what you post on a random forum. But I guess that's why people are flawed. They'd rather think they know something when they really don't than admit they don't know.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
prettisweet626
Technician
|
BECAUSE RACISM IS ALIVE AND IT'S SO SAD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jakelong
Swami
Ad Free
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 5:46 pm on Jan. 4, 2009
I do know all the Blacks in my school though. 
And there are 7 billions or 7 total. And you're buddies with all of them riiight.
How many? Well I don't hang out in groups of 20 or whatever - usually I hang out with 4 other people tops. 
So you know 4 black guys and they make the whole population of blacks in your school and they represent all blacks in your area? Riiight.
They know Negroes have lower IQs. 
You told them and they agreed?
I never said they were closer to the Chimpanzee - just more ape-like.
And you told them that and they agreed?
And lower on the evolutionary tree? Well I tell they must be less evolved if everyone was Black when the first humans were alive - so they must believe that. 
That is NOT what I asked. I know you got the reading comprhension level of a 3 year old so I repeat: You TOLD THEM that they are less evolved to their face and they agreed?
I tell them that I want an all-White nation and they don't oppose it. 
No one here on LW "opposes" it. we just make fun of you thats all. What do THEY say?
I don't want 100% segregation. 
100% white nation 100% segregation.
And Whites can leave. 
Has 0 to do with segregation so irrelevant.
They didn't expect them to take over land with their culture and demand free stuff. 
Why not? It was their land ad their culture. If I go to Germany and start "colonizing" it I totally expect native germans to take over the culture of their own land. If Germans colonize Americas they hould expect Native americans to take over the land and the culture in America. Sounds perfectly normal to me. And if they colonize and impose their ownculture on natives then they should expect newcomers to also take over and impose their culture. Majority wins. It worked in 1492 why can't it word in 2008?
No - I don't consider them White. Nor do they consider themselves White. 
So why bring up the fact that they are considered white today? Totally irrelevant to the discussion here. Let me remind you what I was saying: if you colonize a place with nonwhites you can't expect not to have a bunch of nonwhites around. If you are surprised then you are dumb or insane.
Where they White when Americans found them? Well there were Spaniards and there were Amerinds. They mixed over the years - but when the US took it over it wasn't as mixed. 
so? You colonize a country with nonwhite natives, you bring in nonwhite slaves, you use nonwhite labor because you need cheap labor, and then you're SURPRISED nonwhites are around you????
I can put "Because" wherever I want. 
Sure, tell that to the SAT essay reader.
Well too bad - I did. 
Then too bad you failed.
Didn't someone try to kill Obama already? He must be horrible than... 
some ppl already compare him to Hitler. which is so lol because he isn't even in office. Those assassins though plotted against your hero in 1944 - 11 years after he was elected. But hey there goes your teory that "everyone loved him" in Germany.
But, really, every country is full of anarchists and communists and others that want to kill the leader for whatever reason. 
Still having trouble reading? Here is the whole story since you obviously don't know about it. It is called the 20th of July plot and occured in 1944 fyi.
Since 1938, conspiratorial groups planning an overthrow of some kind had existed in the German Army (Wehrmacht Heer) and in the German Military Intelligence Organization (Abwehr). Early leaders of these plots included Brigadier-General Hans Oster, General Ludwig Beck, and Field Marshal Erwin von Witzleben. Oster was the head of the Military Intelligence Office. Beck was a former Chief-of-Staff of the German Army High Command (Oberkommando des Heeres, OKH). Von Witzleben was the former commander of the German 1st Army and the former Commander-in-Chief of the German Army Command in the West (Oberbefehlshaber West, or OB West). Military conspiratorial groups exchanged thoughts with civilian, political and intellectual resistance groups in the famous Kreisauer Kreis (which met at the von Moltke estate in Kreisau) and in other secret circles.[citation needed] Plans to stage an overthrow and prevent Hitler from launching a new world war were developed in 1938 and 1939, but were aborted because of the indecision of Army Generals Franz Halder and Walter von Brauchitsch, and the failure of the western powers to oppose Hitler's aggressions until 1939. This first military resistance group delayed their plans after Hitler's extreme popularity following the unexpectedly fast success in the battle for France.[citation needed] In 1941 a new conspiratorial group formed. It was led by Colonel Henning von Tresckow, a member of Field Marshal Fedor von Bock's staff, who commanded Army Group Centre in Operation Barbarossa. Tresckow systematically recruited oppositionists to the Group's staff, making it the nerve center of the Army resistance. Little could be done against Hitler while his armies advanced triumphantly into the western Soviet Union through 1941 and 1942, even after the setback before Moscow (in December 1941) that caused the dismissal of both Brauchitsch and Bock.[citation needed] During 1942 Oster and Tresckow nevertheless succeeded in rebuilding an effective resistance network. Their most important recruit was General Friedrich Olbricht, head of the General Army Office headquarters at the Bendlerblock in central Berlin, who controlled an independent system of communications to reserve units all over Germany. Linking this asset to Tresckow's resistance group in Army Group Centre created a viable overthrow apparatus.[citation needed] In late 1942 Tresckow and Olbricht formulated a plan to assassinate Hitler and stage an overthrow during Hitler's visit to the headquarters of Army Group Centre at Smolensk in March 1943, by placing a bomb on his plane. The bomb did not go off, and a second attempt days later with Hitler at an exhibition of captured Soviet weaponry in Berlin also failed. These failures demoralized the conspirators. During 1943 they tried without success to recruit senior Army field commanders such as Field Marshal Erich von Manstein and Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt, to support a seizure of power 
By mid-1943 the tide of war was turning decisively against Germany. The Army plotters and their civilian allies became convinced that Hitler must be assassinated so that a government acceptable to the western Allies could be formed and a separate peace negotiated in time to prevent a Soviet invasion of Germany and to avoid as much bloodshed as possible. In August 1943 Tresckow met a young staff officer, Colonel Count Claus von Stauffenberg, for the first time. Badly wounded in North Africa, Stauffenberg was a political conservative, a zealous German nationalist, and a Roman Catholic with a taste for philosophy. Since the beginning of 1942 he shared the widespread conviction among Army officers that Germany was being led to disaster and that Hitler must be removed from power. For some time his religious scruples had prevented him from coming to the conclusion that assassination was the correct way to achieve this. After the Battle of Stalingrad in December 1942, however, he came to the conclusion that not assassinating Hitler would be a greater moral evil. He brought a new tone of decisive, revolutionary decision-making to the ranks of the resistance. Olbricht now put forward to Tresckow and Stauffenberg a new strategy for staging a coup against Hitler. The Reserve Army had an operational plan called Operation Walküre (Valkyrie), which was to be used in the event that the disruption caused by the Allied bombing of German cities caused a breakdown in law and order, or a rising by the millions of slave laborers from occupied countries now being used in German factories. Olbricht suggested that this plan could be used to mobilize the Reserve Army to take control of German cities, disarm the SS and arrest the Nazi leadership, once Hitler had been assassinated. Operation Valkyrie could only be put into effect by General Friedrich Fromm, commander of the Reserve Army, so he must either be won over to the conspiracy or in some way neutralized if the plan was to succeed. Fromm, like many senior officers, knew in general about the military conspiracies against Hitler but neither supported them nor reported them to the Gestapo. During 1943 and early 1944 there were at least four failed attempts organized by Claus von Stauffenberg and his group to get one of the military conspirators near enough to Hitler for long enough to kill him with hand grenades, bombs or a revolver (in March 1943 by Rudolf Christoph Freiherr von Gersdorff, in late November 1943 by Axel von dem Bussche, in February 1944 by Ewald Heinrich von Kleist, and on 11 March 1944 by Eberhard Freiherr von Breitenbuch). But this task was becoming increasingly difficult. As the war situation deteriorated, Hitler no longer appeared in public and rarely visited Berlin. He spent most of his time at his headquarters at the Wolfschanze (Wolf's Lair) near Rastenburg in East Prussia, with occasional breaks at his Bavarian mountain retreat Obersalzberg near Berchtesgaden. In both places he was heavily guarded and rarely saw people he did not know and trust. Himmler and the Gestapo were increasingly suspicious of plots against Hitler, and specifically suspected the officers of the General Staff, which was indeed the place where most of the young officers willing to sacrifice themselves to kill Hitler were located. By the summer of 1944 the Gestapo was closing in on the conspirators. There was a sense that time was running out, both on the battlefield, where the Eastern front was in full retreat and where the Allies had landed in France on 6 June, and in Germany, where the resistance's room for maneuver was rapidly contracting. The belief that this was the last chance for action seized the conspirators. By this time the core of the conspirators had begun to think of themselves as doomed men, whose actions were more symbolic than real. The purpose of the conspiracy came to be seen by some of them as saving the honor of themselves, their families, the Army and Germany through a grand, if futile gesture, rather than actually altering the course of history. One of Tresckow's aides, Lieutenant Heinrich Graf von Lehndorff-Steinort, wrote to Stauffenberg: "The assassination must be attempted, coûte que coûte [whatever the cost]. Even if it fails, we must take action in Berlin. For the practical purpose no longer matters; what matters now is that the German resistance movement must take the plunge before the eyes of the world and of history. Compared to that, nothing else matters."[3] Himmler had at least one conversation with a known oppositionist when, in August 1943, the Prussian Finance Minister Johannes Popitz, who was involved in Goerdeler's network, came to see him and offered him the support of the opposition if he would make a move to displace Hitler and secure a negotiated end to the war.[4] Nothing came of this meeting, but Popitz was not arrested and Himmler apparently did nothing to track down the resistance network which he knew was operating within the state bureaucracy. It is possible that Himmler, who by late 1943 knew that the war was unwinnable, allowed the 20 July plot to go ahead in the knowledge that if it succeeded he would be Hitler's successor, and could then bring about a peace settlement. Popitz was not alone in seeing in Himmler a potential ally. General von Bock advised Tresckow to seek his support, but there is no evidence that he did so. Goerdeler was apparently also in indirect contact with Himmler via a mutual acquaintance Carl Langbehn. Wilhelm Canaris biographer Heinz Höhne suggests that Canaris and Himmler were working together to bring about a change of regime, but all of this remains speculation 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_20_Plot Tell me please where those top guys are "communists" and "anarchists". Many were aristocreats even conservatives. Beck was a Nazi.
In 1933, upon witnessing the Nazi Machtergreifung, Beck wrote "I have wished for years for the political revolution, and now my wishes have come true.
Witzleben was a commander in the Nazi army and Gernarl Fieldmarshall until 1941. Tresckow was originally pro-Nazi. But those guys didn't share you worship of Hitler. They saw the bad thing he brought on in Germany, the totalitarism, the elimination of the SA. Do you even know about the Night of the Long Knives in which the SS executed many loyal Nazis???? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives I am pretty amazed you claim to know so much about History and Hitler and you don't even know about this. Then again you probably also could pretend to be stupid just hoping I wouldn't catch you on it. After all a low IQ nonwhite is usually not expected to know shit about anything right?
------- "Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin' That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
8:46 pm on Jan. 4, 2009 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 769 Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,320 | Points: 25,233
|
|
| |
|
|
kidd rune
Enlightened One
Patron
|
And there are 7 billions or 7 total. And you're buddies with all of them riiight. 
There are a bit more Blacks than Whites.
So you know 4 black guys and they make the whole population of blacks in your school and they represent all blacks in your area? Riiight. 
You misinterpreted. I hang out in groups of four. I know A LOT more Negroes than that.
You told them and they agreed? 
Yes. They knew it before I said that.
And you told them that and they agreed? 
Yes - every time they make fun of White attributes I do the same with them. It's jokingly but I do admit the ape-like qualities.
That is NOT what I asked. I know you got the reading comprhension level of a 3 year old so I repeat: You TOLD THEM that they are less evolved to their face and they agreed? 
I don't really think they are less evolved - I explained that. I do think they are closer to the original humans - and they know that. I say "If you think the original humans were Black than you must be less evolved versions of non-Blacks" and they don't beg to differ.
No one here on LW "opposes" it. we just make fun of you thats all. What do THEY say? 
Funny - when I made a poll asking if a White nation should exist most people said no. More people on LiveWire oppose White Nationalism than not.
100% white nation 100% segregation. 
Not when you can visit under restrictions.
Has 0 to do with segregation so irrelevant. 
It's not separating. Whites and nonWhites can interact. Nobody said they can't. It's just that if you don't want to you don't have to. Nobody should be forced to live with another race if they don't want to.
Why not? It was their land ad their culture. If I go to Germany and start "colonizing" it I totally expect native germans to take over the culture of their own land. If Germans colonize Americas they hould expect Native americans to take over the land and the culture in America. Sounds perfectly normal to me. And if they colonize and impose their ownculture on natives then they should expect newcomers to also take over and impose their culture. Majority wins. It worked in 1492 why can't it word in 2008? 
Let me rephrase: They didn't expect the Puerto Ricans to establish a distinct culture very different from the mainland Americans and then mass immigrate to White areas and disrupt their lifestyle and replace the dominant culture of the area.
No - I don't consider them White. Nor do they consider themselves White. So why bring up the fact that they are considered white today? Totally irrelevant to the discussion here. Let me remind you what I was saying: if you colonize a place with nonwhites you can't expect not to have a bunch of nonwhites around. If you are surprised then you are dumb or insane. 
It's not my fault. I didn't colonize anyone. Nor did I tell them to or support it. If they didn't want to be colonized they could have fought back or just ignore the culture and practice their own. Also - NOBODY forced them to immigrate to the mainland USA - and NOBODY forced them to not assimilate. That is their own fault.
so? You colonize a country with nonwhite natives, you bring in nonwhite slaves, you use nonwhite labor because you need cheap labor, and then you're SURPRISED nonwhites are around you???? 
I did that? You must have mistaken me for some dead people. Remember - many Americans wanted to send all the nonWhites back to Africa or wherever they came from. I would've supported that.
Sure, tell that to the SAT essay reader. 
Is this being tested?
Then too bad you failed. 
Oh, I "Failed." Don't make me cry! =(
some ppl already compare him to Hitler. which is so lol because he isn't even in office. Those assassins though plotted against your hero in 1944 - 11 years after he was elected. But hey there goes your teory that "everyone loved him" in Germany. 
Alright - over 98% of the German people approved of the National Socialist program four years after it came into power. Hitler was more loved than the average politician of today and the 1930's. Wars constantly make people do insane things. There has never been an important figure someone hasn't wanted to kill.
Still having trouble reading? Here is the whole story since you obviously don't know about it. It is called the 20th of July plot and occured in 1944 fyi. {SNIP} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_20_Plot Tell me please where those top guys are "communists" and "anarchists". Many were aristocreats even conservatives. Beck was a Nazi. 
I know the story. Many people can say they're Nazi's or something and really support another cause. Some people can just be crazy. Some people wanted to end a war that they were forced into - Hitler was one of them. But when Hoss tried to stop the war he was jailed and tortured. Hitler offered to resign if that would've helped. But some people would just do anything to stop a war. Doesn't mean they are right.
Witzleben was a commander in the Nazi army and Gernarl Fieldmarshall until 1941. Tresckow was originally pro-Nazi. But those guys didn't share you worship of Hitler. They saw the bad thing he brought on in Germany, the totalitarism, the elimination of the SA. 
I don't worship Hitler. And what makes you think they were right?
Do you even know about the Night of the Long Knives in which the SS executed many loyal Nazis???? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives I am pretty amazed you claim to know so much about History and Hitler and you don't even know about this. 
Why do you ask a question and answer for me (Wrongfully)? It doesn't make sense!
Then again you probably also could pretend to be stupid just hoping I wouldn't catch you on it. After all a low IQ nonwhite is usually not expected to know shit about anything right?
The Night of the Long Knives is something I'd expect most people to know. Just because I didn't bring it up doesn't mean I didn't know of it. Stop assuming things.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kidd rune
Enlightened One
Patron
|
What does that have to do with the numbers? 
The seven billion was obviously a joke.
How many? Don't you know how to answer straight? Is that something they teach you in NS training school? 
At least 40. I don't count them.
You mean that knew what you were going to say. 
No, they knew that piece of information.
Oh I see...You guys agree to be jerks to each other. Thats something else. I do that often with my buddies too. I doubt though they realize you really believe all that crap and try to spread that stuff on the net. 
I don't consider it being a jerk and I doubt they do.
This And this contradict each other. 
I didn't say they were less evolved. I said that if THEY think they were the original humans than THEY must be less evolved. I myself wouldn't consider the original humans "Black" in the racial sense of the term (but they did have dark skin).
If you think they are closer to the original humans and then claim that it means they are less evolved then you DO BELIEVE they are less evolved. Again your logic is flawed. 
No it doesn't. Ever heard of junk DNA? They are PHYSICALLY more like the original humans. I don't know DNA-wise, do you? And why does how evolved some race is have anything to do with... anything? The Austrailoids are the "Most evolved" people by those standards yet they have lower IQs, higher crime rates, and a higher drop-out rate than any other race.
They don't think it SHOULD exist. It does not mean they are OPPOSED as in "they will PREVENT you from making it". Can you tell the difference? 
I made another poll to check this.
They don't like it or agree with it. It does not mean they will all prevent you from making one UNLESS you make it BY ETHNIC CLEANSING of nonwhites in an EXISTING populated nation. For example Bud2400 may not believe in the goodness of a white nation or that it is necessary since he's for integration but Im pretty sure that of all ppl on LW he's the least likely to raise any finger if you do create a white nation or go live in one. Get it? 
I know what you're saying.
You obviously have no clue what segregation means. In the south blacks and whites WERE segregated. Blacks still had to go to white homes to cook and clean and act as servants. Whites still went to shows performed by blacks. Fuck those guys were way less segreagated than what you are talking about. 
Why the hell would a nonWhite WANT to go into a National Socialist country devoted to preserving Whites?
Unless they go to the land where another race lives. Once they colonize the land of another race they can't complain thay have to live with them. Once they bring in another race as slaves they can't complain that ppl of that race live there. 
If you go to the land of another race, I agree you shouldn't complain that they live there. But, many parts of Europe previously had White populations and didn't bring nonWhite slaves, yet people are MASS IMMIGRATING into those areas.
Why not? Puerto Ricans are native to America. Why should they adpt THEIR culture to the colonizer? They should have expected it and not be greedy. They should have left them alone. 
The Puerto Ricans of today are mostly White but MIXED with the natives. They are native to PUERTO RICO. I'm not trying to change their culture. They should go practice their culture over in Puerto Rico. But White Americans aren't really immigrating to Puerto Rico - and definitely not in the large numbers the Puerto Ricans are immigrating in to Florida.
When you invade somebody's place you should expect you place to be invaded back. Its called karma. Happens all the time in human interactions since the beginning of civilization. 
But Swedish people never invaded the Middle East yet they are mass immigrating into Sweden.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
jakelong
Swami
Ad Free
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 5:34 pm on Jan. 8, 2009
At least 40. I don't count them. 
Ok how many are FRINDS with? All 40?
]No, they knew that piece of information. 
And they approve SERIOUSLY?
I don't consider it being a jerk and I doubt they do. 
insulting each other and calling each other inferior is being a jerk for fun.
I didn't say they were less evolved. I said that if THEY think they were the original humans than THEY must be less evolved. 
You said In this thread that YOU thought ALSO they were closer to the orignal humans.
I do think they are closer to the original humans
THEREFORE by the same reasoning you ALSO think they are less evolved.
I myself wouldn't consider the original humans "Black" in the racial sense of the term (but they did have dark skin). 
I don't think races has ANY meaning at that level.
No it doesn't. 
It doesn't what?
And why does how evolved some race is have anything to do with... anything? 
Why is it important to YOU? Why do you bring it up here on LW?
yet they have lower IQs, higher crime rates, and a higher drop-out rate than any other race. 
That should tell you something about "evolution" "race" and "envrionment".
I made another poll to check this. 
Check out the results.
I know what you're saying. 
Good.
Why the hell would a nonWhite WANT to go into a National Socialist country devoted to preserving Whites? 
They may not. The point is that this would result 100% segregation. You said you didn't WANT that. You have to be really clear about what you really wantwhen you start making your country. Do you really want 100% segregation or not?
If you go to the land of another race, I agree you shouldn't complain that they live there. 
Good.
But, many parts of Europe previously had White populations and didn't bring nonWhite slaves, yet people are MASS IMMIGRATING into those areas. 
True but take a close look at WHO those immigrants are. Many of the nonwhite immigrants in European countries come from former COLONIES of that country. For example Africans and Indians and Pakistanis and Taiwanese go to England more. Because England colonized their country. So when their country went into wars or even during the wars that England had many of those ppl were recruited into armies and invited to go to England for one reason or another. When India or Pakistan had trouble many of the most educated ppl there already knew English and were trained in English culture and education. So moving to England was a natural thing. Many times it was the ppl who were most LOYAL and FAVORABLE to the colonizer who moved there. Later of course since there were already immigrants from India and Pakistan then more came in. But it all got STARTED really because of colonization. Germany is the same thing. Turkey was germanized during WWI because Germany wanted to have control in the region. The thing continued during WWII. So then many Turks went to Germany. Its the same thing again with France. Who are the nonwhites in France? Algerians and Moroccans and Vietnamese, Its no surprise too. That is a BIG reason for the nonwhites in Europe. And the Middle Easterners foing in Europe is the same thing: the colonization and interventions by England and France. If all those countries had fucking STAYED in Europe and not go colonizing and messing around with other countries then MAYBE there would be WAY LESS nonwhite immigration. If you ever study what goes on in Europe you don't see alot of Turks in England or a lot of Pakistanis in Germany or a lot of Vietnamese in Germany, You don't see a lot of native americans in Poland. If all those Europeans had not gone and take Africans as slaves and scattered them all over the Americas there wouldn't be so many of them.
------- "Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin' That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
6:19 pm on Jan. 8, 2009 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 769 Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,320 | Points: 25,233
|
|
| |
|
|
kidd rune
Enlightened One
Patron
|
Ok how many are FRINDS with? All 40? 
Yeah, I thought that's what I was supposed to be estimating.
And they approve SERIOUSLY? 
Yeah... Everyone knows Blacks score lower on that. It's not a new piece of information. The question is WHY.
insulting each other and calling each other inferior is being a jerk for fun. 
When the insults are jokes it's different. And we never called each other inferior.
You said In this thread that YOU thought ALSO they were closer to the orignal humans. 
I did. So what?
THEREFORE by the same reasoning you ALSO think they are less evolved. 
I think they are PHYSICALLY more like the original humans. But that's phenotypically. Not genotypically. Everyone evolves - it's just that some mutations actually do something and some do nothing.
I don't think races has ANY meaning at that level. 
What do you mean?
It doesn't what? 
It doesn't mean they're less evolved.
Why is it important to YOU? Why do you bring it up here on LW? 
It's not important to me. Why would you say that? You don't know anything about me past what I've said on this forum, and that accounts for <1% of my life.
That should tell you something about "evolution" "race" and "envrionment". 
Maybe it does. But that's not what I was pointing at. Some people think that saying one race is less evolved or closer to the original humans that's calling them "Inferior" - but other things that they consider claims of "inferiority" are also put on the race that is FURTHEST from the original humans.
Check out the results.
It's 11,11,13 now. There aren't many results at all really - they are too close together.
They may not. The point is that this would result 100% segregation. You said you didn't WANT that. You have to be really clear about what you really wantwhen you start making your country. Do you really want 100% segregation or not? 
I see segregation as nonWhites not being able to set foot in the country and Whites not being able to set foot out of it. That wouldn't happen. The citizens of the country would be encouraged to treat EVERYONE with respect (Until the INDIVIDUAL gives a reason otherwise) and that accounts for the nonWhite tourists too.
True but take a close look at WHO those immigrants are. Many of the nonwhite immigrants in European countries come from former COLONIES of that country. For example Africans and Indians and Pakistanis and Taiwanese go to England more. Because England colonized their country. So when their country went into wars or even during the wars that England had many of those ppl were recruited into armies and invited to go to England for one reason or another. When India or Pakistan had trouble many of the most educated ppl there already knew English and were trained in English culture and education. So moving to England was a natural thing. Many times it was the ppl who were most LOYAL and FAVORABLE to the colonizer who moved there. Later of course since there were already immigrants from India and Pakistan then more came in. But it all got STARTED really because of colonization. Germany is the same thing. Turkey was germanized during WWI because Germany wanted to have control in the region. The thing continued during WWII. So then many Turks went to Germany. Its the same thing again with France. Who are the nonwhites in France? Algerians and Moroccans and Vietnamese, Its no surprise too. That is a BIG reason for the nonwhites in Europe. And the Middle Easterners foing in Europe is the same thing: the colonization and interventions by England and France. If all those countries had fucking STAYED in Europe and not go colonizing and messing around with other countries then MAYBE there would be WAY LESS nonwhite immigration. If you ever study what goes on in Europe you don't see alot of Turks in England or a lot of Pakistanis in Germany or a lot of Vietnamese in Germany, You don't see a lot of native americans in Poland. If all those Europeans had not gone and take Africans as slaves and scattered them all over the Americas there wouldn't be so many of them. 
But what about the Muslims in Scandinavia? And I think a BIG reason Why nonWhites go to Europe is because they find it better/safer/less corrupt than their country. That's their opinion. It's just sad that they immigrate there anyway - many times just to find a house. And what about all the Muslims in Canada? Canada didn't go around conquering.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
Moonscar
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 6:28 pm on Jan. 8, 2009
Ok how many are FRINDS with? All 40? 
Yeah, I thought that's what I was supposed to be estimating.
And they approve SERIOUSLY? 
Yeah... Everyone knows Blacks score lower on that. It's not a new piece of information. The question is WHY.
insulting each other and calling each other inferior is being a jerk for fun. 
When the insults are jokes it's different. And we never called each other inferior.
You said In this thread that YOU thought ALSO they were closer to the orignal humans. 
I did. So what?
THEREFORE by the same reasoning you ALSO think they are less evolved. 
I think they are PHYSICALLY more like the original humans. But that's phenotypically. Not genotypically. Everyone evolves - it's just that some mutations actually do something and some do nothing.
I don't think races has ANY meaning at that level. 
What do you mean?
It doesn't what? 
It doesn't mean they're less evolved.
Why is it important to YOU? Why do you bring it up here on LW? 
It's not important to me. Why would you say that? You don't know anything about me past what I've said on this forum, and that accounts for <1% of my life.
That should tell you something about "evolution" "race" and "envrionment". 
Maybe it does. But that's not what I was pointing at. Some people think that saying one race is less evolved or closer to the original humans that's calling them "Inferior" - but other things that they consider claims of "inferiority" are also put on the race that is FURTHEST from the original humans.
Check out the results.
It's 11,11,13 now. There aren't many results at all really - they are too close together.
They may not. The point is that this would result 100% segregation. You said you didn't WANT that. You have to be really clear about what you really wantwhen you start making your country. Do you really want 100% segregation or not? 
I see segregation as nonWhites not being able to set foot in the country and Whites not being able to set foot out of it. That wouldn't happen. The citizens of the country would be encouraged to treat EVERYONE with respect (Until the INDIVIDUAL gives a reason otherwise) and that accounts for the nonWhite tourists too.
True but take a close look at WHO those immigrants are. Many of the nonwhite immigrants in European countries come from former COLONIES of that country. For example Africans and Indians and Pakistanis and Taiwanese go to England more. Because England colonized their country. So when their country went into wars or even during the wars that England had many of those ppl were recruited into armies and invited to go to England for one reason or another. When India or Pakistan had trouble many of the most educated ppl there already knew English and were trained in English culture and education. So moving to England was a natural thing. Many times it was the ppl who were most LOYAL and FAVORABLE to the colonizer who moved there. Later of course since there were already immigrants from India and Pakistan then more came in. But it all got STARTED really because of colonization. Germany is the same thing. Turkey was germanized during WWI because Germany wanted to have control in the region. The thing continued during WWII. So then many Turks went to Germany. Its the same thing again with France. Who are the nonwhites in France? Algerians and Moroccans and Vietnamese, Its no surprise too. That is a BIG reason for the nonwhites in Europe. And the Middle Easterners foing in Europe is the same thing: the colonization and interventions by England and France. If all those countries had fucking STAYED in Europe and not go colonizing and messing around with other countries then MAYBE there would be WAY LESS nonwhite immigration. If you ever study what goes on in Europe you don't see alot of Turks in England or a lot of Pakistanis in Germany or a lot of Vietnamese in Germany, You don't see a lot of native americans in Poland. If all those Europeans had not gone and take Africans as slaves and scattered them all over the Americas there wouldn't be so many of them. 
But what about the Muslims in Scandinavia? And I think a BIG reason Why nonWhites go to Europe is because they find it better/safer/less corrupt than their country. That's their opinion. It's just sad that they immigrate there anyway - many times just to find a house. And what about all the Muslims in Canada? Canada didn't go around conquering. 
I once met a white guy with a Homo Erectus kind of shaped head
------- "When you do things right. People won't be sure you've done anything at all" ~ God like space cloud
|
6:31 pm on Jan. 8, 2009 | Joined: Nov. 2008 | Days Active: 256 Join to learn more about Moonscar New York, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 4,003 | Points: 6,611
|
|
| |
|
|
kidd rune
Enlightened One
Patron
|
I once met a white guy with a Homo Erectus kind of shaped head 
Good for you.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|