Meter is the method from which most of poetry originated. It's based in a language's stress. English is fickle because we're a hodge-podge of Germanic languages and French - most other languages have an easier way to recognize the stress. In poetry with meter, you cannot deviate (much) from a pattern. This formula "strengthens" the voice. For example, Shakespeare wrote all of his works in near-perfect meter. That's partially what makes him great. Writing in meter is laborious, and not until the 19th century did poets truly leave it for less formulaic works. Take the following line. It's one of Shakespeare's famous lines. I'm going to capitalize the stressed syllables:
...a HORSE, a HORSE! my KINGdom FOR a HORSE!...
The problem with teenage poets is that they don't even acknowledge meter. Even a poet who doesn't confine his/her poems to meter should first understand and be capable of keeping the human ear pacified, otherwise your voice tends to end up like crap. That's partially why "emo poetry" is looked down upon - the authors don't know shit about meter. That, and they also don't invoke any emotions. It's just ranting.
Post edited at 8:04 pm on Jan. 2, 2009 by GeneCosta
-------
Sell a man a fish, he eats for a day, teach a man
how to fish, you ruin a wonderful business opportunity. - Karl Marx
693 users online 
211479 members 
You have 1 new message.
Patron
Sustainer
