|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
What's the point of racial purity? (hey kidd rune) |
|
|
|
Replies: 146 Last Post Dec. 4, 2008 8:12pm by jakelong
|
|
|
|
|
Web Resources: Rape Myths Dispelled, Help & Information about Rape
USA Rape, Abuse and Incest Hotline: 1-800-656-HOPE (1-800-656-4673)
|
Web Resources: Teen Pregnancy Facts, Abortion Facts
USA Youth Crisis Hotline: 1-800-448-4663
|
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
kidd rune
Soothsayer
Patron
|
Did the master like them back? The slave owners still exploited their work and became rich and powerful thanks to the free work of their slaves. 
Not all of them came rich and powerful - many just had enough to sustain their families. Though you had to have money and quite a bit of it to have slaves in the first place. And why wouldn't the master like them? They're working for him and he doesn't have to pay them money. They like him because he feeds them, clothes them, and gives them shelter just for work in a field. Not ALL were like that though - before you think I implied that.
Thats the defenition of greed. Just now the big fat cats outsource the jobs to overseas so they can pay non americans $1 an hour for work that they can resell for $100. 
It's not greed if you're trying to live. Slaves didn't have to make money - they just had to work. If everyone around you has slaves and puts out 10x more food - you are going to go out of business or find some nice workers.
Why do you assume they will be extinct simply because there's less of them? ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS HAVE MORE BABIES. No one prevents them from that. 
What about the ones that have kids with other races? Again - there's more to White Nationalism than Whites in their own nation. The nation wouldn't be an exact replica of European nations and would strive for the smarter, stronger, healthier people to have more children and get payed for it.
It takes no character for a minority student to receive scholarship? You think just being a given race gets you a scholarship automatic? You really think those scholarships aren't flooded with demands and award it to 1 guy out of a 1,000? In roder to even get those scholarship you have to show you have worked hard in you community to make things around you better, you have volunteered for 10x more hours than anyone esle, worked in jobs, got into athletics and god knows what else. Even getting those scholarships is harder than getting the lottery. Just one your eyes and get the reality check instead of making lies to fit your view of the world. 
Much of the scholarships will just hand you money for writing a damn essay because nobody cares about signing up. My teacher was the ONLY person that signed up for a Jewish scholarship - she wrote a paper on why she wanted it (She admitted it wasn't very good at all) and she got it. She even LIED about being Jewish - she's a Black Christian! Anyway - I'm going to sign up for a bunch of Black scholarships. If they say I'm not Black I'll throw the race card with my new Black powers. I will tell you if I get any money.
Race is a concept. its not a living thing. Gentics exists inside people. But race is just the grouping of people. It doesnt exist by itself. 
Exist 1. to have actual being; be: The world exists, whether you like it or not. "The world exists" - given to us by Dictionary.com. IS the world living Jakelong? Race is SOMETHING. It's a grouping of people - and the Earth is a planet we live on. They both exist - and they can both lose their existence.
You are really desnse eh? Genes are the building block. Genetics is the STUDY of the genes, Race is an arbitrary grouping of people PEOPLE are what's living. Not race. 
Live - to continue in existence. We explained why race exists - therefore it fits in the living category.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
jakelong
Swami
Ad Free
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 2:58 pm on Dec. 1, 2008
Not all of them came rich and powerful - many just had enough to sustain their families. 
Maybe because they were so full of fail. They had slaves to work for them and can't even make ends meet?
And why wouldn't the master like them? They're working for him and he doesn't have to pay them money. 
So he only likes them as slaves but not as anything else?
They like him because he feeds them, clothes them, and gives them shelter just for work in a field. 
HAHA NO! He has to feed them and clothe them becase if his precious investment dies off he's fucked. Thats it.
Not ALL were like that though - before you think I implied that. 
Things are not 100% this or that anyway. So that doesn't prove much.
It's not greed if you're trying to live. 
If whites pawn blacks so much how come they coulnd't live without them? and how come even WITH slaves they barely scraped a living?
Slaves didn't have to make money - they just had to work. 
If their master starved they starved even more.
If everyone around you has slaves and puts out 10x more food - you are going to go out of business or find some nice workers. 
Cotton =/= food
What about the ones that have kids with other races? 
What about them? Why does that bother you? Worry about your own thing. You want more white babies then get whites to make 3-5 kids per family. Make laws to stop abortions and outlaw them. That's doing more for your race than worrying about what other whites and nonwhites are doing.
The nation wouldn't be an exact replica of European nations and would strive for the smarter, stronger, healthier people to have more children and get payed for it. 
Oh yeah the Nazi ideal...
Much of the scholarships will just hand you money for writing a damn essay because nobody cares about signing up. 
And 1 out of 1,000 or more gets selected. Besides the essay must describe what you have done for your group, what you have done for the community what your life has been and the struggles you went through. You have to speak about the volunteer work and the regular you have done. And yeah EVERYONE ELSE in that group has more or less done the same stuff and gone though the same shit. Only the one who STANDS OUT gets the scholarship. But nice try talking about stuff you know shit about.
My teacher was the ONLY person that signed up for a Jewish scholarship - she wrote a paper on why she wanted it (She admitted it wasn't very good at all) and she got it.
And she's the only example ever.
She even LIED about being Jewish - she's a Black Christian! 
And she admitted that to you guys? Write to the people who gave her the scholarship and denounce her. She's a cheat and she should be punished. Oh wait thats right you are too hicken to write things like that. Did you even write that letter to PBS? I bet not. All you can do WhiNe as a good WNer.
------- "Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin' That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
4:58 pm on Dec. 1, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 766 Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,200 | Points: 25,033
|
|
| |
|
|
jakelong
Swami
Ad Free
|
Race exist in your mind. You said yourself that you can have 5 races or 50 races depending on how you make the cutoff. So which races do you want to exist 5 or 50?
------- "Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin' That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
5:22 pm on Dec. 1, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 766 Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,200 | Points: 25,033
|
|
| |
|
|
kidd rune
Soothsayer
Patron
|
Maybe because they were so full of fail. They had slaves to work for them and can't even make ends meet? 
No... They needed slaves because everyone else had them. If they DIDN'T have slaves to work for them they would surely become impoverished.
So he only likes them as slaves but not as anything else? 
He thinks that the only reason for them to be in the USA is as slaves.
HAHA NO! He has to feed them and clothe them becase if his precious investment dies off he's fucked. Thats it. 
Many of the slaves loved their masters actually. When they were freed they WANTED to go back to their masters. "I was raised by one of the greatest men in the world. There was never one born of a woman greater than Gen. Robert E. Lee, according to my judgment." - Freed Slave William Mack Lee http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper/wpa/durham1.html ""Freedom is all right, but de niggers was better off befo' surrender, kaze den dey was looked after an' dey didn' get in no trouble fightin' an' killin' like dey do dese days. If a nigger cut up an' got sassy in slavery times, his Ole Marse give him a good whippin' an' he went way back an' set down an' 'haved hese'f. If he was sick, Marse an' Mistis looked after him, an' if he needed store medicine, it was bought an' give to him; he didn' have to pay nothin'. Dey didn' even have to think 'bout clothes nor nothin' like dat, dey was wove an' made an' give to dem. Maybe everybody's Marse and Mistis wuzn' good as Marse George and Mis' Betsy, but dey was de same as a mammy an' pappy to us niggers." "
Things are not 100% this or that anyway. So that doesn't prove much. 
Of course - there are always a few people on the other side - but most people are usually on one side.
If whites pawn blacks so much how come they coulnd't live without them? and how come even WITH slaves they barely scraped a living? 
1. They don't "Pawn" Negroes at all. 2. They have to have slaves because everyone else did. It's simple. If a small town gets a WalMart and all it had beforehand was a private store - the private store, having a lot less to offer, looses business. That's how it is. If nobody had slaves it would've been the same. But if some had them - they would've come out with more and the others would lose money and become impoverished.
If their master starved they starved even more. 
If he was in that bad of a condition he would probably sell a slave or two - they were quite expensive.
Cotton =/= food 
All they picked was cotton? That's it? The same goes for all though: Cotton, tobacco, etc. The more you put out the better you'll be - and if you don't put out as much then you'll lose business and become poor.
What about them? Why does that bother you? Worry about your own thing. You want more white babies then get whites to make 3-5 kids per family. Make laws to stop abortions and outlaw them. That's doing more for your race than worrying about what other whites and nonwhites are doing. 
Outlawing abortion is a bad idea for people as it is. As I said - this would all go more smoothly and successfully in a White nation.
Oh yeah the Nazi ideal... 
Why do you care? And it's not really the "Nazi ideal" either - just similar.
And 1 out of 1,000 or more gets selected. Besides the essay must describe what you have done for your group, what you have done for the community what your life has been and the struggles you went through. You have to speak about the volunteer work and the regular you have done. And yeah EVERYONE ELSE in that group has more or less done the same stuff and gone though the same shit. Only the one who STANDS OUT gets the scholarship. But nice try talking about stuff you know shit about. 
Sorry Jakelong - that you can't seem to understand that they aren't all the exact same. Not all scholarships are the exact same. Some go by area - if you're the only Black in your area that signs up for it - you get it. If 10 sign up - they choose one. It all depends on the scholarship.
And she's the only example ever.
Oh, really!
And she admitted that to you guys? Write to the people who gave her the scholarship and denounce her. She's a cheat and she should be punished. Oh wait thats right you are too hicken to write things like that. Did you even write that letter to PBS? I bet not. All you can do WhiNe as a good WNer. 
1. I didn't whine. I don't care about the scholarship - I actually think these minority or specific race scholarships SHOULD NOT EXIST. Colleges should pick the most successful students - not try to even out the races like they try to. And I emailed PBS and they never replied.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
jakelong
Swami
Ad Free
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 5:35 pm on Dec. 1, 2008
They needed slaves because everyone else had them. 
LOL sounds like the typical I need an SUV because everone else has them.
If they DIDN'T have slaves to work for them they would surely become impoverished. 
Because they are so full of fail. Most Native Americans did not need slaves to survive before the europeans came. .
He thinks that the only reason for them to be in the USA is as slaves. 
And he represents "everyone"?
Many of the slaves loved their masters actually.
How many? Some did. Many did not. Read this
Yet we must never forget that these same "welfare capitalist" plantations in the Deep South were essentially ruled by terror. Even the most kindly and humane masters knew that only the threat of violence could force gangs of field hands to work from dawn to dusk "with the discipline," as one contemporary observer put it, "of a regular trained army." Frequent public floggings reminded every slave of the penalty for inefficient labor, disorderly conduct, or refusal to accept the authority of a superior.
"I was raised by one of the greatest men in the world. There was never one born of a woman greater than Gen. Robert E. Lee, according to my judgment." - Freed Slave William Mack Lee 
Well yeah Robert E Lee was a great general and a great man. Doesn't take much to see that. It doesn't mean he wanted to stay his slave. And you can't say that of all those slave owners that wanted to get rich on cotton.
Maybe everybody's Marse and Mistis wuzn' good as Marse George and Mis' Betsy, but dey was de same as a mammy an' pappy to us niggers." 
Sure there were plenty of uncle toms around.
Of course - there are always a few people on the other side - but most people are usually on one side. 
So you are not proving much still.
2. They have to have slaves because everyone else did. It's simple.
Although your ancestor did more than just owning. He SOLD slaves.
If nobody had slaves it would've been the same. 
Then why bring them in at all? Who started that idea? The simple fact was that really FEW families owned slaves. Most slaves were grouped in working gangs Read this
The majority of slaveholding was in the southern United States where most slaves were engaged in an efficient machine-like gang system of agriculture. According to the 1860 U.S. census, nearly four million slaves were held in a total population of just over 12 million in the 15 states in which slavery was legal. Of all 1,515,605 families in the 15 slave states, 393,967 held slaves (roughly one in four),[6] amounting to 8% of all American families .[7] Most slaveholding households, however, had only a few slaves. The majority of slaves were held by planters, defined by historians as those who held 20 or more slaves. The planters achieved wealth and social and political power. Ninety-five percent of black people lived in the South, comprising one-third of the population there, as opposed to 2% of the population of the North 
Those planters were the greedy rich folks. Those who just a had a few slaves were small farmers and had them mostly as servants and household ppl. THOSE were the slaves who became more attaached to their master s and treated better. but they were the MINORITY. The MAJORITY of slaves belonged to large plantations that treated them like shit and raped the women and took their kids and sold the kids like cattle. Thats how your ancestor got rich by selling slaves to those planters. Nothing to be proud about if you ask me.
But if some had them - they would've come out with more and the others would lose money and become impoverished. 
Bullshit. Read the info above. It kills that theory.
All they picked was cotton? That's it? 
Tobacco =/= food
------- "Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin' That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
6:09 pm on Dec. 1, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 766 Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,200 | Points: 25,033
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
kidd rune
Soothsayer
Patron
|
LOL sounds like the typical I need an SUV because everone else has them. 
You don't understand the concept of competition?
Because they are so full of fail. Most Native Americans did not need slaves to survive before the europeans came. . 
HA! The Amerinds had slaves!
And he represents "everyone"? 
No, but I'm sure you had enough common sense to know that when I said "Everyone" I meant the vast majority of people - and that anyone that didn't was such a small amount that they were almost impossible to discern from the general population. It's like saying everyone in Japan is East-Asian, and people wouldn't beg to differ. Only 0.6% of the population is - and that's not really enough to stagger the idea.
How many? Some did. Many did not. Read this Well yeah Robert E Lee was a great general and a great man. Doesn't take much to see that. It doesn't mean he wanted to stay his slave. And you can't say that of all those slave owners that wanted to get rich on cotton. 
The thought that all slave owners were great men is absurd! But to say that all were evil to their slaves is as bad too.
So you are not proving much still. 
What do you think I'm trying to prove?
Although your ancestor did more than just owning. He SOLD slaves.
It was a job - and he wasn't really the man in charge - he just took them to the Americas and worked on the boat - but helped them sell them of course. It was his job - an accepted practice back then but not now.
Then why bring them in at all? Who started that idea? The simple fact was that really FEW families owned slaves. Most slaves were grouped in working gangs Read this Those planters were the greedy rich folks. Those who just a had a few slaves were small farmers and had them mostly as servants and household ppl. THOSE were the slaves who became more attaached to their master s and treated better. but they were the MINORITY. The MAJORITY of slaves belonged to large plantations that treated them like shit and raped the women and took their kids and sold the kids like cattle. Thats how your ancestor got rich by selling slaves to those planters. Nothing to be proud about if you ask me. 
First off - he sold slaves, it wasn't his fault what the masters did to them. How do you know he got rich? I doubt he did. Second off - The vast majority of American Whites didn't have slaves, couldn't afford them, and/or didn't want them. Third off - It said right there, the small farms didn't have slaves like the large plantations. The large plantation owners wanted money for their families or whatever else and the slaves were the right path to that. Of course they achieved wealth - just like the owner of Walmart and his family.
Bullshit. Read the info above. It kills that theory. 
It doesn't say anything about business and the affects on the non-slaveholding population. Therefore, it doesn't even touch up on disproving my "Theory" or really have anything to do with it.
Tobacco =/= food 
Coffee and sugar cane?
Actually most wal-marts are a double edge sword for a community. It brings in cheap goods from China and low paying jobs but it kills the local economy and kills the competition from good local store owners. So yeah slavery and wal-mart are about as bad. Greed is the big motivation for both really. Good example that confirms my point. 
Many times when Walmarts come to town they take the other stores (In the case of a city in Polk County near me it ran the Winn-Dixie out of business). Greed, greed, greed - is that everything to you? Someone that wants to make money is greedy?
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
jakelong
Swami
Ad Free
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 5:35 pm on Dec. 1, 2008
Not all scholarships are the exact same. 
No they're not. But you used them to"prove" that race > character and your example failed.
Oh, really! 
I am asking you. Is she the rule or the excpetion?
1. I didn't whine. I don't care about the scholarship - I actually think these minority or specific race scholarships SHOULD NOT EXIST.
The funny thing is I agree but most scholarships are about ethnicity and religion. There are plenty of scholarship for Christians, for Muslims for Jehovah Witness you name it. There are plenty of scholarships for Irish ppl, Scottish ppl, Italians, Germans etc... Overall theres a million scholarships just for whites. http://tinyurl.com/yf98my And here's one to make you happy http://www.discriminations.us/2006/11/a_white_scholarship_in_boston.html And here is more info on those scholarships
First, although white students often think that so-called minority scholarships are a substantial drain on financial aid resources that would otherwise be available to them, nothing could be further from the truth. According to a national study by the General Accounting Office, less than four percent of scholarship money in the U.S. is represented by awards that consider race as a factor at all, while only 0.25 percent (that's one quarter of one percent for the math challenged) of all undergrad scholarship dollars come from awards that are restricted to persons of color alone. In other words, whites are fully capable of competing for and receiving any of the other monies--roughly 99.75 percent of all the bucks out there for college. 
http://www.civilrights.org/library/features/op-ed-white-victimhood-1.html But hey maybe they are too full of fail to bother.
And I emailed PBS and they never replied.
Emails dont usually work for that kind of stuff unless you get 1,000s of your friends to flood them with emails. Even then those sites usually don't respond. To get them to listen to you need to WRITE a formal letter. Get your parents to help you. Send a copy of the letter to EACH LOCAL PBS station in YOUR area not the general pbs org.
------- "Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin' That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
6:33 pm on Dec. 1, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 766 Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,200 | Points: 25,033
|
|
| |
|
|
kidd rune
Soothsayer
Patron
|
No they're not. But you used them to"prove" that race > character and your example failed. 
Umm, no. I found a great example and just because it's not the same for ALL of them doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
I am asking you. Is she the rule or the excpetion? 
Exception - but not the only one, is she?
The funny thing is I agree but most scholarships are about ethnicity and religion. There are plenty of scholarship for Christians, for Muslims for Jehovah Witness you name it. There are plenty of scholarships for Irish ppl, Scottish ppl, Italians, Germans etc... Overall theres a million scholarships just for whites. http://tinyurl.com/yf98my And here's one to make you happy http://www.discriminations.us/2006/11/a_white_scholarship_in_boston.html And here is more info on those scholarships http://www.civilrights.org/library/features/op-ed-white-victimhood-1.html But hey maybe they are too full of fail to bother. 
Is that supposed to make me think they should exist? All scholarships that have anything to do with something that isn't helpful for college (such as genetic makeup or what country your parents are from) are fail.
Emails dont usually work for that kind of stuff unless you get 1,000s of your friends to flood them with emails. Even then those sites usually don't respond. To get them to listen to you need to WRITE a formal letter. Get your parents to help you. Send a copy of the letter to EACH LOCAL PBS station in YOUR area not the general pbs org. 
I emailed the specific stations emails. I'll print it out and send it - how much do you want to bet they won't give a shit?
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
|
|
kidd rune
Soothsayer
Patron
|
Could you PM me an example so I can see what you wrote? 
Tomorrow - this is my last post for the night.
------- "One of the Germans... would frequently snatch a child from the woman's arms and... tear the child in half... Such incidents... occurred all the time." - A Year in Treblinka, Yankel Wiernik, Treblinka's "most authoritative eyewitness"
|
|
|
jakelong
Swami
Ad Free
|
Quote: from kidd rune at 6:25 pm on Dec. 1, 2008
You don't understand the concept of competition? 
I know that was not the only motivation going on with slavery. And competition is often related to greed.
The Amerinds had slaves! 
You can't read the word MOST? Yep just what I thought.
when I said "Everyone" I meant the vast majority of people 
Prove it was the "vast majority of people" in the whole United States.
and that anyone that didn't was such a small amount that they were almost impossible to discern from the general population. 
Prove that those who wanted blacks around wee a very small minority.
The thought that all slave owners were great men is absurd! But to say that all were evil to their slaves is as bad too. 
Neither of which I said. Next.
What do you think I'm trying to prove? 
That you are full of fail.
It was a job
Sure. Gassing a bunch of jews was just a job.
- and he wasn't really the man in charge - he just took them to the Americas and worked on the boat - but helped them sell them of course. 
If he was just the employee how did he make so much money? And why "of course"/ If he had some sdistate for selling human beings he would not have done it. But he thought their were "not human" right? So he could wash his hands off that. Yep just what I thought.
The MAJORITY of slaves belonged to large plantations that treated them like shit and raped the women and took their kids and sold the kids like cattle. 
Interesting how you avoided answering that.
First off - he sold slaves, it wasn't his fault what the masters did to them.
Pontius Pilate hasd the same reasoning
How do you know he got rich? I doubt he did. 
Didn't you say he did?
Second off - The vast majority of American Whites didn't have slaves, couldn't afford them, and/or didn't want them. 
Which is exaclty what I posted thanks for repeating the obvious. Excpet that YOU argued that if they did not have slaves they would starve or be poor. That slavery was NEEDED for ppl to survive and make a living, Were all whites who had no slaves poor in the south?
The large plantation owners wanted money for their families or whatever else and the slaves were the right path to that. 
They wanted to become rich and powerful. Prett much defines greed yeah. And why the RIGHT path?
Of course they achieved wealth - just like the owner of Walmart and his family. 
Also defines greed yep.
It doesn't say anything about business and the affects on the non-slaveholding population. 
If you ar saying that slaving owning was ALSO BAD for the whites who did not own slaves then I agree. Slavery made EVERYONE suffer: blacks AS WELL poor whites. It committed a grave injustivce to BOTH black and other whites. When whites from the south start realizing this maybe there will be more understanding across the board.
------- "Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin' That's how we be survivin'" - BEP
|
7:00 pm on Dec. 1, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 766 Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,200 | Points: 25,033
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|