---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 11:48 pm on June 30, 2009

---

Science for the details. Religion for the reasons.

---

Misread.
Um, The bible doesn't really explain why, it just kind of 'is'. I never caught an ultimate reasoning behind this nonsense.

---

---

Quote: from Aimforthehead at 12:53 pm on July 3, 2009

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 11:48 pm on June 30, 2009

---

Science for the details. Religion for the reasons.

---

 
 Misread.  
 Um, The bible doesn't really explain why, it just kind of 'is'. I never caught an ultimate reasoning behind this nonsense.

---

Maybe that's your problem, you read it with the idea that it's "nonsense".

---

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 3:15 pm on July 3, 2009

---

Quote: from Aimforthehead at 12:53 pm on July 3, 2009

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 11:48 pm on June 30, 2009

---

Science for the details. Religion for the reasons.

---

  Misread.
  Um, The bible doesn't really explain why, it just kind of 'is'. I never caught an ultimate reasoning behind this nonsense.

---

Maybe that's your problem, you read it with the idea that it's "nonsense".

---

Please, if you have any idea why we have appendixes or males have nipples let me know.  
Or on a deeper matter why evil exists but soon will not exist. Or why god has emotions that even humans see as obviously a bad thing.

---

Evil exists because man has free will. What is the "bad" thing about emotions?

-------
"God does not play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God does play dice" - Stephen Hawking

Bohica

No, that's how. Not why. Man has freewill therefore has the potential to be evil, for what purpose? Why is there evil at all?

The bad thing about bad emotions like jealousy is it gets people killed.

-------
Admiration is the furthest thing from comprehension.

---

I didn't ask for how. You claimed biology is how whereas religion is why. If religion has neither, then thereyago.

No, that's how. Not why. Man has freewill therefore has the potential to be evil, for what purpose? Why is there evil at all?

The bad thing about bad emotions like jealousy is it gets people killed.

---

What does science have to say about 'evil'?

What does science have to say about 'emotions'?

-------
"God does not play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God does play dice" - Stephen Hawking

Bohica

---

Quote: from Aimforthehead at 6:35 pm on July 3, 2009

---

I didn't ask for how. You claimed biology is how whereas religion is why. If religion has neither, then thereyago.  

 No, that's how. Not why. Man has freewill therefore has the potential to be evil, for what purpose? Why is there evil at all?  

 The bad thing about bad emotions like jealousy is it gets people killed.

---

What does science say about the appendix? Nipples?  

---

---

What does science have to say about 'evil'?

---

---

What does science have to say about 'emotions'?

---

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 4:47 pm on July 3, 2009

---

Quote: from Aimforthehead at 6:35 pm on July 3, 2009

---

I didn't ask for how. You claimed biology is how whereas religion is why. If religion has neither, then thereyago.

  No, that's how. Not why. Man has freewill therefore has the potential to be evil, for what purpose? Why is there evil at all?

  The bad thing about bad emotions like jealousy is it gets people killed.

---

What does science say about the appendix? Nipples?

---

They are useless.

 

---

What does science have to say about 'evil'?

---

For the most part, it is subjective.  

 

---

What does science have to say about 'emotions'?

---

So, I'm wondering, are you ever going to answer my question?

---

Defend your argument or don't, I could care less, I already know you and most other Christians can't grasp the concept of debate.

-------
Admiration is the furthest thing from comprehension.

---

You claimed religion explains exactly the reason behind life, whereas science explains the how of it.
I claimed your religion does no such thing, as it's not given an actual valid reason for living.  

Defend your argument or don't, I could care less, I already know you and most other Christians can't grasp the concept of debate.

---

---

Science for the details. Religion for the reasons.

---

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 11:48 pm on June 30, 2009

---

Science for the details. Religion for the reasons.

---

 
This one. And I'm about done here, you're being extremely dull and it's a little annoying to be honest.

---

And the question I was originally responding to was the OP... "Which do you think best answers the questions of how the earth was created?"

Post edited at 5:17 pm on July 3, 2009 by Forever Angel

-------
"God does not play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God does play dice" - Stephen Hawking

Bohica

---

Quote: from Moridin at 8:54 am on July 3, 2009

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 8:38 am on July 2, 2009

---

Planetary formation tells me how it happened. And no, "why" and "how is it that..." are not equivalent.

---

 

 Really? Name one "why" question that cannot be converted to "how is it that.."

---

Why would I do that?

---

What is the reason for me doing that?

Try again.

-------
"The larger the island of knowledge, the longer the
shoreline of wonder" (Ralph W. Sockman)

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 6:09 pm on July 3, 2009

---

Quote: from Moridin at 8:54 am on July 3, 2009

---

Quote: from Forever Angel at 8:38 am on July 2, 2009

---

Planetary formation tells me how it happened. And no, "why" and "how is it that..." are not equivalent.

---

  Really? Name one "why" question that cannot be converted to "how is it that.."

---

Why would I do that?

---

What is the reason for me doing that?

Try again.

---

You try again... that wasn't, "how it it that..." Changing your tactics and rules in mid stream is not acceptable. If you look back, "Science for the details. Religion for the reasons" was my original post.

-------
"God does not play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God does play dice" - Stephen Hawking

Bohica