|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prince o palities
Who's your daddy?
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from SilverMoonSparkles at 1:00 am on June 16, 2009
I have studied Demonology and the Occult for 10 years. It was not a mental illness at all.
For this claim to hold any weight with me, you would first of all have to be at least twenty-six. Call me ageist, but study you conducted when you were ten is not impressive for me. Additionally, "study" would have to imply something more than recreational personal inquiry. (For example, when I say I have studied church history for three years, that refers to a combination of intensive personal study, frequent and rigorous courses on the subject, and apprenticeship under professional historians. That form of study commands respect from me.) The very least you could do is demonstrate in some observable way your scholarly acumen in this field, rather than making an unjustified claim that you have it. What about your "study" leads you to believe that this is a genuine possession? If you posses some training which gives you a unique perspective in this community, it is your duty to utilize that training to aid us in coming to a more accurate knowledge of the truth. (NB: These questions do not come from a place of ideological antipathy toward modern possession. I am, for all intents and purposes, agnostic on the subject.)
------- "It is the wrong question to ask, and therefore, as one might expect, has no right answer." - Hans von Campenhausen This is the philosophy of my life.
|
|
|
( The Immortal Lie )
Connoisseur
Sustainer
|
Quote: from Prince o palities at 10:38 am on June 16, 2009
Quote: from SilverMoonSparkles at 1:00 am on June 16, 2009
I have studied Demonology and the Occult for 10 years. It was not a mental illness at all.
For this claim to hold any weight with me, you would first of all have to be at least twenty-six. Call me ageist, but study you conducted when you were ten is not impressive for me. Additionally, "study" would have to imply something more than recreational personal inquiry. (For example, when I say I have studied church history for three years, that refers to a combination of intensive personal study, frequent and rigorous courses on the subject, and apprenticeship under professional historians. That form of study commands respect from me.) The very least you could do is demonstrate in some observable way your scholarly acumen in this field, rather than making an unjustified claim that you have it. What about your "study" leads you to believe that this is a genuine possession? If you posses some training which gives you a unique perspective in this community, it is your duty to utilize that training to aid us in coming to a more accurate knowledge of the truth. (NB: These questions do not come from a place of ideological antipathy toward modern possession. I am, for all intents and purposes, agnostic on the subject.) 
No I would not have to be 26. I am 22 years old and was raised from 12 years and on as a Wiccan. That's all. I have extensively studied things such as posession and the occult ever since then, seeing as I also lived with people who were Christian Bible thumpers. And, I did go to college. Therefore, I'm not just speaking out my ass if that's what you meant. Post edited at 8:02 am on June 16, 2009 by The Immortal Lie
------- Im An Honest Asshole. That Makes Me Special.
|
|
|
GoodFairy13
Soothsayer
|
Quote: from SilverMoonSparkles at 4:01 pm on June 16, 2009
Quote: from Prince o palities at 10:38 am on June 16, 2009
Quote: from SilverMoonSparkles at 1:00 am on June 16, 2009
I have studied Demonology and the Occult for 10 years. It was not a mental illness at all.
For this claim to hold any weight with me, you would first of all have to be at least twenty-six. Call me ageist, but study you conducted when you were ten is not impressive for me. Additionally, "study" would have to imply something more than recreational personal inquiry. (For example, when I say I have studied church history for three years, that refers to a combination of intensive personal study, frequent and rigorous courses on the subject, and apprenticeship under professional historians. That form of study commands respect from me.) The very least you could do is demonstrate in some observable way your scholarly acumen in this field, rather than making an unjustified claim that you have it. What about your "study" leads you to believe that this is a genuine possession? If you posses some training which gives you a unique perspective in this community, it is your duty to utilize that training to aid us in coming to a more accurate knowledge of the truth. (NB: These questions do not come from a place of ideological antipathy toward modern possession. I am, for all intents and purposes, agnostic on the subject.) 
No I would not have to be 26. I am 22 years old and was raised from 12 years and on as a Wiccan. That's all. I have extensively studied things such as posession and the occult ever since then, seeing as I also lived with people who were Christian Bible thumpers. And, I did go to college. Therefore, I'm not just speaking out my ass if that's what you meant. 
Why were you raised from 12? Not earlier or later? Seems an unusual age.
------- If you stare long enough into the darkness, In time, you'll see someone stare back.
|
|
|
( The Immortal Lie )
Connoisseur
Sustainer
|
Quote: from GoodFairy13 at 1:10 pm on June 16, 2009
Quote: from SilverMoonSparkles at 4:01 pm on June 16, 2009
Quote: from Prince o palities at 10:38 am on June 16, 2009
Quote: from SilverMoonSparkles at 1:00 am on June 16, 2009
I have studied Demonology and the Occult for 10 years. It was not a mental illness at all.
For this claim to hold any weight with me, you would first of all have to be at least twenty-six. Call me ageist, but study you conducted when you were ten is not impressive for me. Additionally, "study" would have to imply something more than recreational personal inquiry. (For example, when I say I have studied church history for three years, that refers to a combination of intensive personal study, frequent and rigorous courses on the subject, and apprenticeship under professional historians. That form of study commands respect from me.) The very least you could do is demonstrate in some observable way your scholarly acumen in this field, rather than making an unjustified claim that you have it. What about your "study" leads you to believe that this is a genuine possession? If you posses some training which gives you a unique perspective in this community, it is your duty to utilize that training to aid us in coming to a more accurate knowledge of the truth. (NB: These questions do not come from a place of ideological antipathy toward modern possession. I am, for all intents and purposes, agnostic on the subject.) 
No I would not have to be 26. I am 22 years old and was raised from 12 years and on as a Wiccan. That's all. I have extensively studied things such as posession and the occult ever since then, seeing as I also lived with people who were Christian Bible thumpers. And, I did go to college. Therefore, I'm not just speaking out my ass if that's what you meant. 
Why were you raised from 12? Not earlier or later? Seems an unusual age. 
Becuase I was adopted and my biological mother was a witch and so is my aunt and brothers and sister and its just..Thats my real family. The adopted family are the christians. I had no contact with my real family until I was 12.
------- Im An Honest Asshole. That Makes Me Special.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( The Immortal Lie )
Connoisseur
Sustainer
|
Quote: from Prince o palities at 3:23 pm on June 16, 2009
Quote: from SilverMoonSparkles at 10:01 am on June 16, 2009
No I would not have to be 26. I am 22 years old and was raised from 12 years and on as a Wiccan. That's all. I have extensively studied things such as posession and the occult ever since then, seeing as I also lived with people who were Christian Bible thumpers. And, I did go to college. Therefore, I'm not just speaking out my ass if that's what you meant. 
My point (clearly, I thought) was that studies you may have undertaken as a pre-pubescent child do not really hold any kind of authoritative relevance. Moreover, having attended college does not make you a qualified expert on all things. What did you study in school? (Note the relevant use of "study" in the preceding sentence.) And you still have yet to demonstrate how your "study" is relevant. What do you know that we who haven't studied don't know that makes you so sure? 
I did get your point, no need to be sarcastic, everybody. I am not saying those things to make it sound like what a 12 year old believes is really that relevant to their future I just have seen things that made me believe. That's how everyone comes to believe in things really. That and alot of faith. I'm not here to argue, in fact this topic was about Michel not my personal beliefs.
------- Im An Honest Asshole. That Makes Me Special.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|