|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
When do you think "Linux" will be ready for the home user? |
| I'm talking about desktop Linux (competing with Windows and OSX etc) |
|
|
|
Replies: 17 Last Post June 30 12:32am by anonomouse
|
|
|
|
|
| Choice |
Votes |
Percent |
|
| It already is |
8 |
32% |
|
| End of this year |
0 |
0% |
|
| End of next year |
1 |
4% |
|
| Within 5 years |
5 |
20% |
|
| Within 10 years |
1 |
4% |
|
| Never |
10 |
40% |
|
| Vote Now! |
25 Votes Cast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
|
|
Dissilusioned
five dollars trip to the moon
Patron
|
I once tried installing Linux. I nearly cried it was that complicated. The manual was thicker than my Psychology textbook was.
------- ReCapatcha Contest لوري
|
|
|
Dissilusioned
five dollars trip to the moon
Patron
|
Therefore, I can only deduce that gaining an a level in psychology is easier than installing Linux successfully.
------- ReCapatcha Contest لوري
|
|
|
|
|
allsmiles
Enlightened One
Patron
|
Never. People don't trust stuff they don't pay for. For whatever reason.
------- When they leave me, they're all smiles. When they leave you, they're in tears.
|
|
|
Daveh
Wealthy Hobo
Patron
|
It has become a lot more user friendly now, and in some ways i think its allready suitable for the more advanced PC user. but even in 5-6 years time when its just as easy to use as windows is. Its not going to be ready for the home user till software developers start supporting it.
|
10:59 am on June 11, 2009 | Joined: Mar. 2008 | Days Active: 309 Join to learn more about Daveh England, United Kingdom | Male | Posts: 1,525 | Points: 4,679
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Macropiper
Like a Ninja!
Patron
|
It already mostly is, the main problems preventing people from using it seem to be certain drivers and commercial software support. I have heard little about any other areas where the user experience is really inferior to that on either Windows (which isn't saying much) or OSX. As for the problems I do know about... The problems with drivers cannot be resolved unless the hardware manufacturers are willing to provide specifications for drivers to be written. Wireless network cards are particularly problematic, although the situation is improving as more companies get a clue and help out. Broadcom are still fucking useless bastards. nVidia is also a problem, sure, the proprietary driver works fine, but most distributions won't ship it, and it tends to break with some new versions of Xorg. Its probably obvious that I am somewhat angry at the hardware manufacturers that are still being useless bastards. Its a pain to have to look to see if some piece of hardware will work, I would much rather be able to just buy something, plug it in, and have it work immediately, if all hardware manufacturers had a clue and allowed decent open source drivers to be written, then this would be the situation in nearly all cases. As for the commercial software, its a problem, won't be made to work on Linux until it becomes more popular, Linux won't be more popular till it exists, not sure how that could be fixed. Video and Audio codecs are also a problem that isn't going away until the patents on nearly all of the common ones expire or software patents no longer exist. Linux is the only operating system installed on my laptop that isn't in a virtual machine. Granted, most of what I do on the computer is programming, browsing the internet and watching videos. I do not need things like Microsoft Office or Photoshop. I do need to test websites in IE, but I have Windows Vista in a virtual machine for that. Other people obviously have different requirements. I also have a gaming machine, which usually runs XP, though I do have Fedora on there for things like ripping CDs and DVDs and transcoding media.
|
|
|
Sector Corrupt
Guru
Patron
Tech Support Leader
|
Meh, at this point really with super user friendly distros like Ubuntu most of the time you don't even need to use the command line. That said I'd prefer that it doesn't become hyper mainstream. As it is with the ease of use lately it's gotten a lot of attention from people who think they're good with computers latching on. I'm fine with a steady stream of new users, but only to the extent that Unix Culture is preserved. It's that hacker ethic, and the keeping to the old ways of customizable, simple programs that really makes linux great. Besides, if you can't use a command line you really shouldn't be using Linux since you're not taking advantage of one of the best features.
------- Livewire Wifey: Katie :D Windows, For when you don't know any better. Mac, for when you think you do. Linux, for when you actually want to get something done.
|
|
|
|
|
Sector Corrupt
Guru
Patron
Tech Support Leader
|
Quote: from Macropiper at 4:14 am on June 12, 2009
Quote: from Sector Corrupt at 8:00 pm on June 12, 2009
Besides, if you can't use a command line you really shouldn't be using Linux since you're not taking advantage of one of the best features.
I disagree with this, besides, one can make similar statements for OSX and Windows too. Most people use computers knowing far less than they probably should know about them to operate them in a reasonably secure manner. 
Admittedly, but at least with those operating systems there's not nearly the same cultural thing. Linux grew up in the strong Unix culture with Open Source ideals, and sometimes I worry than an influx of people who just want a free operating system that doesn't get viruses will dilute the whole hacker/programmer culture and ethic that is part of what I love about Linux. I'm fine if people come over to Linux and learn to be like the rest of us, but ignorant users are worse than less users in my books.
------- Livewire Wifey: Katie :D Windows, For when you don't know any better. Mac, for when you think you do. Linux, for when you actually want to get something done.
|
|
|
drifting
Patron
|
Coming Pre-loaded (see netbooks and the occasional desktop) it works, and I believe it is 99% usable when preloaded. The only real problem is that people dont understand what it is, and expect Windows apps to work on it, simply because its a computer that isnt a Mac. They dont understand that its a completely different OS. As for separate installations, it will never be entirely user friendly because, again, most people dont understand it. Combine that with crappy drivers (which I do see improving over the next three years or so) and its hard for the average user to use. I do think it has gotten better, and most people who are computer literate can probably handle installing it, provided all of their hardware is supported.
------- Kids in the back seat can cause accidents. Accidents in the back seat can cause kids. Moral: Drive a two seater
|
9:37 pm on June 13, 2009 | Joined: Jan. 2007 | Days Active: 700 Join to learn more about drifting Indiana, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 17,906 | Points: 31,156
|
|
| |
|
|
ihax
Advisor
|
I feel as though it is already ready. Dell is selling computers with Ubuntu on them pre-loaded. Asus is selling their EEE series netbook computers with Xandros linux pre-installed. HP launched a netbook with SuSE Linux on it. WIND (I believe thats the company's name) is selling netbooks with gOS (Linux) It's happening...
------- MSN - mitchell@ihax.us Hit me up on MSN if you want to chat.
|
4:59 pm on June 23, 2009 | Joined: Dec. 2007 | Days Active: 40 Join to learn more about ihax New Hampshire, United States | Gay Male | Posts: 83 | Points: 524
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|