---

If you gave someone money for a purpose that was never fulfilled, then they owe you that money.

---

the purpose was fulfilled but not in the terms specified by the aformentioned contract. therefore, essentially  it was not fulfilled and it is void by means of misrepresentation on his part for saying he would not enter my agreed upon portion of the condo unless he was legally obligated to, which because something smells bad most certainly isnt.

-------
♖♘♗♕♔♗♘♖

♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙

---

such as one for paying rent, then when it is to be found voided, would the lessee be required to repay all monies given to him for the purpose of rent? Since the contract was never binding. Please answer in your legal opinion, not in what sounds like would net you some quick cash.

---

If you believe there was a breach of the lease, state law, or certain landlord's duties you have to sue for damages. He doesn't have to give you anything back just because you ask. Many states also allow tenants to withhold rent representing a decrease in value of the premises resulting from whatever breach the landlord did.

I currently study contract law at the University of York but unless you address what I have stated above there really is no straight forward legal advice to provide for you.

Property law or the law torts will allow you to sue based on the fulfillment of a pledge recognized on your part but was unaccomplished on his.
In other words you would have the legal power to seek reimbursement due to falsified information/contract/identity or a number of the above and this would allow you to seek compensation on the grounds of dishonoring a contract and betraying your trust and honest intentions.

if you provide the issue with the above contract I can in turn provide you with the required legal advice.

Kind Regards

Benvolio James Harvey

Post edited at 6:29 pm on Nov. 6, 2009 by adroflhitlol1