I beg to differ. It's perfectly acceptable. If you ask me, it's the RESPONSIBLE thing to do.
Kids will be kids, kids will have sex. It's nothing new, and it's not going to change, regardless of what people say.
If they want to do it bad enough, they will. Why shouldn't they at least be responsible about it and use proper protection?
The US has funded abstinence-only sex ed for several years now.
The average amount of teen pregnancy keeps going up.
CLEARLY, insisting on abstinence is not going to do crap. Let's be real, aside from if you have very strong religious/moral beliefs that you WILL NOT have sex before marriage, most teens and even adults at times are not exactly what you'd call opposed to it. And even if someone DOES have religious beliefs, that doesn't mean things will go as planned.
Just saying... my point was, I disagree with your statement. They're not condemning birth control, they're condemning sex in the first place.
-------
CrackerJax
-Molly/17-
Message me for my AIM, MSN & Yahoo
361 users online 
222897 members 
You have 1 new message.
Patron
Sustainer
I know most religions condemn all forms of birth control (except for abstinence, of course), but what if there is a justified reason for it? What if one partner is a carrier for a devastating genetic disease that is very likely to be passed on to any children they have, or what if the woman is undergoing some medical treatment (like chemotherapy) that will very likely end up killing the child in the womb if she does get pregnant?
