|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
 NEW YEARS EVE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
Flavored rolling papers banned in the US |
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25 — Last Post Oct. 24 1:13am by 420ftw
|
|
|
|
|
Web Resources: Drug Myths Dispelled, Drug & Alcohol Information
USA Drug Abuse Hotline: 1-800-662-4357
|
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
|
|
Mabzie
Guru
 Ad Free
|
     
Well... I've been saying this from day one but...
FUCK OBAMA
-------
i heard u leik zerglings
|
2:08 pm on Oct. 23, 2009 | Joined: Nov. 2004 | Days Active: 1,029
Join to learn more about Mabzie Michigan, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 10,419 | Points: 22,184
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gro
Soothsayer
 Patron
|
Quote: from Juggalotus at 2:32 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
 Quote: from gro at 3:52 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Quote: from Juggalotus at 1:37 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Quote: from Ldzpln at 3:36 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Wait, so Obama is going against weed now?
Haha you haven't heard? He is working on harsher penalties for people who are smoking without a prescription.
Unless you are thinking of something I am not aware of, you being disingenuous. There's a huge difference between him pushing for laws that make it easier to break up major trafficking organizations, and 'working on harsher penalties for people smoking without a prescription.'
I do not remember where I saw it, I am trying to find it now. But he put a ear Mark in another bill that would call for harsher penalties for people who smoke cannabis and people who sell it also.
As far as I know (and it's likely I would have heard about it here if it were otherwise,) all he's done in terms of harsher penalties for any marijuana related crime is support something that would've allowed for far longer prison terms for people who run organizations that do more than fifty million dollars a year in marijuana trafficking, or something like that. Additionally, your post doesn't make any goddamn sense. "put in ear mark in another bill calling for harsher penalties for people who smoke"? You do realize:
a) Obama doesn't put anything in any bills directly - at least not any more, since he's no longer a senator. Or are you talking about something from when he was in the legislature?
b) An earmark is a controversial budget allocation, not whatever the hell you are thinking of
c) It wouldn't call for higher penalties if it were going to be an antimarijuana bill. It would make higher penalties.
|
3:15 pm on Oct. 23, 2009 | Joined: Mar. 2006 | Days Active: 576
Join to learn more about gro AfghanistaN | Bisexual | Posts: 3,906 | Points: 10,413
|
|
| |
|
|
( Juggalotus )
Omnipotent One
Patron
|
Quote: from gro at 5:15 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Quote: from Juggalotus at 2:32 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Quote: from gro at 3:52 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Quote: from Juggalotus at 1:37 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Quote: from Ldzpln at 3:36 pm on Oct. 23, 2009
Wait, so Obama is going against weed now?
Haha you haven't heard? He is working on harsher penalties for people who are smoking without a prescription.
Unless you are thinking of something I am not aware of, you being disingenuous. There's a huge difference between him pushing for laws that make it easier to break up major trafficking organizations, and 'working on harsher penalties for people smoking without a prescription.'
I do not remember where I saw it, I am trying to find it now. But he put a ear Mark in another bill that would call for harsher penalties for people who smoke cannabis and people who sell it also.
As far as I know (and it's likely I would have heard about it here if it were otherwise,) all he's done in terms of harsher penalties for any marijuana related crime is support something that would've allowed for far longer prison terms for people who run organizations that do more than fifty million dollars a year in marijuana trafficking, or something like that. Additionally, your post doesn't make any goddamn sense. "put in ear mark in another bill calling for harsher penalties for people who smoke"? You do realize:
a) Obama doesn't put anything in any bills directly - at least not any more, since he's no longer a senator. Or are you talking about something from when he was in the legislature?
b) An earmark is a controversial budget allocation, not whatever the hell you are thinking of
c) It wouldn't call for higher penalties if it were going to be an antimarijuana bill. It would make higher penalties.
What I read may have been propaganda then. But if I come across it I will post it so that way you can verify for me.
-------
Recession = When your neighbor loses his job.
Depression = When you lose your job.
Recovery = When obama loses his job.
|
|
|
420ftw
Technician
|
saw it on the news. its all flavored tobacco products.
they said kids are more likely to try it because its flavored
|
1:13 am on Oct. 24, 2009 | Joined: Oct. 2009 | Days Active: 16
Join to learn more about 420ftw California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 134 | Points: 315
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| / / / Viewing Topic | |
|
509 users online 
225728 members 
You have 1 new message.
