---

Do you know yourself?

---

---

And?

---

---

Most rapes are done by ppl known by the victim. But we don't know if they were planned and how.  

---

---

They DO. Just not is the same numbers. Why? Ask them.

---

---

It is challenged in court. But the officers are the ones who mark it down that way. If you want an example of how the system works go to p14 in that doc

http://ag.ca.gov/cjsc/publications/hatecrimes/hc05/preface05.pdf

---

---

You can conclude that Blacks want to rape Whites more than vice versa.

---

---

So, therefore, the statistics aren't true.

---

---

The bias itself can't be determined unless the criminal SAYS there was a racial bias - and that's only the ones that admit it.

---

Here is the definition

---

A hate crime, also known as a bias crime, is a criminal offense committed against a person, property, or society that is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender's bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin.

---

---

Based on just 10? You can make some generalizing based on just 10?

---

---

Oh thats right. If evidence pawns your claim then its NOT true. Same with holocaust evidence etc...

---

How do you know that EVERY SINGLE person that had race as a motive admitted it? How do you know that people that had NO race motive weren't accused of having one?

Holocaust evidence.... No need to go there Jakelong...

---

And there have been a plenty that did. But they don't even have to.

---

---

There were LESS THAN 10 cases of White on black rape, yet OVER THIRTY THOUSAND cases of Black on White.

---

---

How do you know that EVERY SINGLE person that had race as a motive admitted it? How do you know that people that had NO race motive weren't accused of having one?

---

---

I can go shoot a Negro because he's Black and say it was for a different reason - they have no way of knowing, do they?

---

---

None of which proves they WANTED to harm whites becuase they were whites.

---

---

We don't know and therefore we can't claim it either way.

---

---

Yes they do. Your writings. Your previous claims. Your ppattern of work. The absence of OTHER motives.

---

You don't have to say that you want to kill a black person to point to some race-based motive. Escpcially  if there is NOT other motive.

BTW I don't say that all of that is true of you or that you WOULD do it. I am just telling you HOW ppl could point backwards to some motive. I am no lawyer though so it is all guesswork. I don't really know how its done.

-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP

---

So in your case you think NO one can point to a motive? How about the fact hat you want to be segregated from them yet you have still 6 years in which you vae to be around nonwhites and you claim that you WILL BE KILLED for your wanting a white nation? To you everything is about race or about rac-esurvival. So You would have a race-based motive yeah.

---

Perhaps I didn't even SEE the victim and didn't know of his race.

---

You don't have to say that you want to kill a black person to point to some race-based motive. Escpcially  if there is NOT other motive.

---

---

BTW I don't say that all of that is true of you or that you WOULD do it. I am just telling you HOW ppl could point backwards to some motive. I am no lawyer though so it is all guesswork. I don't really know how its done.

---