Man on the moon lulz. Where did you get your logic from? Dr. Seuss?

-------
And you, demon, what do you have faith in?
Nothing. I am so exquisitely empty

---

how can you say man didn't land on the moon when they have fuckin satellites orbiting the earth, don't you somewhere in between they said lets check out that big rock over yonder.

---

And hokie, I know, no-one has really presented any facts; admittedly, I created this topic just to see people's reactions.

Post edited at 3:25 pm on Oct. 24, 2008 by Ju5tin

-------
ledzep

---

Quote: from Tyrant at 2:18 am on Oct. 22, 2008

---

how can you say man didn't land on the moon when they have fuckin satellites orbiting the earth, don't you somewhere in between they said lets check out that big rock over yonder.

---

Going to the moon, successfully landing on the moon,launching back to Earth, and landing on Earth is much more difficult than launching a satellite into orbit, especially with technology they had in the 1960s. Like, the computers they had on board were no more powerful than a modern day crappy 8-digit calculator.

And hokie, I know, no-one has really presented any facts; admittedly, I created this topic just to see people's reactions.

---

thats besides my point if they had/have the technology to build planes that can fly on the edge of space and launch satellites into orbit, don't you think they can build a spacecraft that could go to the moon and back.

-------
American badman in England

---

Quote: from Ju5tin at 5:23 pm on Oct. 24, 2008

---

Quote: from Tyrant at 2:18 am on Oct. 22, 2008

---

how can you say man didn't land on the moon when they have fuckin satellites orbiting the earth, don't you somewhere in between they said lets check out that big rock over yonder.

---

Going to the moon, successfully landing on the moon,launching back to Earth, and landing on Earth is much more difficult than launching a satellite into orbit, especially with technology they had in the 1960s. Like, the computers they had on board were no more powerful than a modern day crappy 8-digit calculator.  

 And hokie, I know, no-one has really presented any facts; admittedly, I created this topic just to see people's reactions.  

 

---

thats besides my point if they had/have the technology to build planes that can fly on the edge of space and launch satellites into orbit, don't you think they can build a spacecraft that could go to the moon and back.

---

---

Agreed.

America is a sham.

---

ur a shame to the human race

-------
American badman in England

---

Quote: from blufindr at 11:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008

---

Agreed.  

 America is a sham.

---

 

ur a shame to the human race

---

Spoken like a true American

-------
Must I prove to you how good we are together?

---

Quote: from Tyrant at 10:50 pm on Oct. 30, 2008

---

Quote: from blufindr at 11:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008

---

Agreed.

  America is a sham.

---

 ur a shame to the human race

---

Spoken like a true American

---

---

Quote: from MushroomSatsujin at 12:04 am on Oct. 3, 2008

---

Quote: from generalzod at 9:01 pm on Oct. 2, 2008

---

Mythbusters proved every conceivable anti-Moon landing theory wrong. So, they did, now get the fuck over it.

---

They do half assed investigations. They cant prove shit. They did not land on the moon. Now get over it

---

I have to agree they "proved" that its not possible to shoot a sniper scope at range ( look it up in WW2 history/ half the WW2 movies made) they said it wasn't possible but there's been several independent experiments that proved it is, and similar stunts have been done at longer ranges.

---

actually they proved it plausible, under the right circumstances, it could happen, they just couldn't do it

-------
be nice to geeks one day youl be working for one

---

I get my logic from Jesus.

Man on the moon lulz. Where did you get your logic from? Dr. Seuss?

---

---

you know what, with all this arguing, no-one in here can prove whether or not anybody landed on the moon, so whats the point

---

I'd like to see anyone who thinks the moon landing was faked rebuttal the points that this guy pointed out.

I mean, honestly, I'm not really sure what I believe, I only know what I was told, but I wasn't there, so I can't know, but according to the "conspiracy" theories he has pointed it, it seems very plausible it happened, and that anyone thinking that it didn't are blowing it out of proportion. Then again, what do I know, or any of us for sure? But this guy made great points, and I'd like to see them proven false or unstable, just out of mere interest. Because I sure can't.