|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
Web Resources: Suicide Myths Dispelled, Suicide Information
USA Suicide Hotline: 1-800-SUICIDE (1-800-784-2433)
|
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
Vordhosbn
Quality Control Engineer
|
    
right. well we're still going in circles. you think it's right to kill somebody to save others, i thing that it's wrong.
-------
In the world we must seek, love is purged of the instinct for domination.
-- Bertrand Russel, Proposed Roads to Freedom
|
|
|
|
|
Crazy snake
Novice
 Patron
|
A) Considering what she did was wrong, raising interest rates on already financially crippled people, I would consider her murder, and the equal distribution of her money throughout the neighbourhood justifiable. As technically what she was doing was like murder, taking peoples money, so they could not afford medicines, food, shelter, and would die possibly. B) As justifiable as I find it, I would more than likely not do it. However, if it was a dire situation, and it would grossly improve the lives of many innocent, and deserving people, then perhaps I would.
-------
They say learning to love yourself is the first step,
that you take when you want to be real...
Just Be - Dj Tiesto
|
|
|
MotoMojo
Wealthy Hobo
|
You can't kill someone just for being unpleasant. Although she was a bitch for having such high interest rates, it isn't her fault. She didn't force anyone to use her company. The interest rates should be known from the initial pawn, and therefore she made her living semi-honestly.
-------
Spicy Pidgeon
|
10:31 am on Sep. 28, 2008 | Joined: July 2004 | Days Active: 337
Join to learn more about MotoMojo Mississippi, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,741 | Points: 5,177
|
|
| |
|
|
Jaxie
Executive
|
I would have to go with no on both questions. While it may seem that some people's morals are subject to circumstance, I feel as if morals should be definite and stable. I think murder is wrong when the situation is not so that another is directly in the position of dying unless the first is killed, and even in such a situation, I'm not sure that I, myself, could kill. Just because the woman did something unkind, perhaps immoral, or is cast as a "bad person," doesn't mean that she deserves such a fate as being killed. If she is dying anyway, the result of money being able to be distributed will be reached soon enough, and considering this, killing her shortly beforehand would be nearly pointless, aside from illegal and immoral.
-------
{If only} To live by If
|
10:09 pm on Sep. 30, 2008 | Joined: May 2008 | Days Active: 180
Join to learn more about Jaxie New York, United States | Straight Female | Posts: 458 | Points: 3,111
|
|
| |
|
|
exceedinglyrare
Delicate Thing
Patron
|
To the OP: It was her life. That she chose to live it poorly and cause others distress is no reason to kill her and take her money. There are more honest means of gaining money than murdering an old woman, crotchety though she may be.
-------
Let yourself be enchanted,
You just might break through
To ever ever after
|
|
|
the seer
Visionary
|
Good and evil are human concepts, in reality neither exist its all perspective. however I don't think anyone can answer this without being a hypocrite unless you say that capitalism is bad or a starving community is a good thing.
-------
those who martch in rank and file have my contempt
for they where given a brain by mistake when a spinal cord would suffice
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| / / / Viewing Topic | |
|
860 users online 
222866 members 
You have 1 new message.
Quote: from 
