Questions -- LiveWire Teen Forums

Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 1:44 pm on Sep. 24, 2008

Quote: from fenrir at 11:14 am on Sep. 24, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 1:01 pm on Sep. 24, 2008
Quote: from fenrir at 10:56 am on Sep. 24, 2008
Or even worse, is simply having money considered a crime against humanity if we still have a double digits percentage who routinely live below the poverty line? Or if one choses not to give to a particular charity, should that be grounds for immediate execution, as well?
Unfortunately, what your proposing is not justice, but vigilantism. We live in a day where simply being rich should not be a justification for cold blooded murder.
Beware a slippery slope whenever arbitrarily designating whomever is Evil.
I never said I was proposing justice or that it wasn't murder, you two need to quit putting words in my mouth and read the actual question.
And she wasn't just rich, she committed corporate crimes against all these poor people. It's THEIR MONEY that she stole it.
Es tut mir leid, but both Nikki and I are tired of dealing with the same "cold, heartless hag ruthlessly control her block with an iron fist where the helpless beggars require a Robin Hood persona to liberate them from their unfair poverty in hopes to better distribute it throughout the Common Wealth" routine.
1. I repeat. Simply being Capitalistic at the sake of moral behavior should not be a sole reason as to merit a death sentence.
2. Modern Society is not limited to the Sherwood Forest and Robin Hood can be argued as a deterrent against any further funding toward the elite minority governing a greater sense of poverty beyond your minor scenario.
3. What good is an example without further application? We're not speaking against the mere act of taking one's life, but questioning both your purpose and intention that you're proposing. I cannot speak for Nikki, but I have greater stock in her ability to articulate her arguments more so than you already have.
Granted, I was being facetious earlier when I inquired if merely refusing to contribute funds toward a particular charity organization or refusal to offer aid to homeless should be grounds for death. However, you still have not argued your point clearly enough as to prevent my scenario from occurring either, I'm afraid.
what the hell is wrong with you I told you I wouldn't do it, but that I think if he did it because he thought he was doing good he could still be considered a good person instead of a bad one.
that's the original question I was answering dear God.
when you ass u me you make and ass out of u and me

First, why don't you launch a more coherent argument? Second, it isn't my fault if you're seemingly becoming lost in translation. Third, your example is meaningless without further application or contributive merit apart from this purely isolated case where everyone in the background begins to cheer once the Wicked Witch from the East has a house topple on her. Fourth, I am quite aware both of my context and reasons for doing so, but it appears that you're incapable of thinking outside your very limited worldview.

And finally, you fail at providing any explanation for how and why we should empathize with the murder of a terminally ill woman responsible for fiscal strangulation of her respective community. Once again, apart from vigilante justice, there is certainly nothing right where the primary focus for this justice to be financially based and appropriated.

Not my fault you refuse to admit your argument is both naive and incomplete.

-------
"How incitful of you, dwarf. Though I can't speak for fenrir,
I beleive that he too has a certain degree of sarcasm
and humor in his posts." - Prince o palities

751 users online 222868 members 1311 active today Advertise Here