|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
TRD Supercharged Tundra Clocked 0 to 60 in 4.4 Seconds |
|
|
|
Replies: 13 Last Post Nov. 15, 2008 7:41pm by tempoluvver69
|
|
|
|
|
( IMPALA )
Executive
|
The good folks at Motor Trend recently tested a regular cab Toyota Tundra outfitted with Toyota Racing Development's new 5.7-liter V-8 supercharger plus a few other TRD-supplied tweaks. The result? A blistering fast 0 to 60 mph time of only 4.4 seconds! That makes this truck the fastest pickup on the planet with factory approved, and warrantied, kit. It's faster than the 2004-06 Dodge Ram SRT-10 (0 to 60 mph in 5.0 seconds), 1991-92 GMC Syclone (0 to 60 mph in 4.6 seconds) and 2007-08 Holden HSV Maloo Ute (0 to 62 mph in 4.9 seconds). The Tundra's TRD compressor is an Eaton Twin Vortices System roots-type supercharger, which uses the newest four-lobe, high-helix rotors, like the ZR-1 Corvette. A water-to-air intercooler system with a low-temp radiator is part of the setup. Included are high-flow fuel injectors, iridium spark plugs, a higher-flow fuel pump and a TRD-designed performance air-intake system. Boost pressure is 8.5 psi at maximum demand. The system provides a significant increase in horsepower and torque. Stock output — 381 horsepower and 401 pounds-feet of torque — improves to 504 hp at 5,500 rpm and 550 pounds-feet of torque. We drove the same Tundra several months ago on the drag strip at Toyota Speedway in Irwindale, Calif. We didn't measure our 0 to 60 mph score but we did record our time and speed in the 1/8-mile sprint at 9.07 seconds at 81.16 mph. Could we hit 60 mph in 4.4 seconds? We don't know but we'd sure love to try.
------- non shifting motherf-cker is BANNED
|
1:03 pm on Nov. 11, 2008 | Joined: Oct. 2008 | Days Active: 113 Join to learn more about IMPALA Illinois, United States | Male | Posts: 3,098 | Points: 3,327
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TopShelf
Novice
|
My dad has that 5.7 without S/C. I'll have to buy it for him.
------- ..and the Show goes on ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Cingular Wireless
Guru
Patron
|
Yay, Can't wait for them to release a Hybrid/I4 Supercharger ;D
------- 2009 Toyota Camry Hybrid
|
|
|
( IMPALA )
Executive
|
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFU
------- non shifting motherf-cker is BANNED
|
5:12 pm on Nov. 11, 2008 | Joined: Oct. 2008 | Days Active: 113 Join to learn more about IMPALA Illinois, United States | Male | Posts: 3,098 | Points: 3,327
|
|
| |
|
|
emo sux69
Guru
Patron
|
Quote: from Cingular Wireless at 12:08 pm on Nov. 12, 2008
Yay, Can't wait for them to release a Hybrid/I4 Supercharger ;D
gtfo lol
|
|
|
mcodeath
Connoisseur
Patron
|
I guess the big question is, whos even looking to buy something like this these days?
|
3:03 am on Nov. 14, 2008 | Joined: May 2008 | Days Active: 202 Join to learn more about mcodeath Wisconsin, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 2,271 | Points: 6,214
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTF
Guru
Patron
|
The Tundra has about 100HP more then the F-150, and yet, its payload AND max towing are over 1,000lbs LESS than the F-150 with its smaller engine. Also, I've never heard of F-150s having such fucked up problems as warped tail gates, cab/bed rubbing, etc.
|
12:28 pm on Nov. 15, 2008 | Joined: April 2007 | Days Active: 639 Join to learn more about FTF Idaho, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 21,792 | Points: 22,998
|
|
| |
|
|
tempoluvver69
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 3:28 pm on Nov. 15, 2008
The Tundra has about 100HP more then the F-150, and yet, its payload AND max towing are over 1,000lbs LESS than the F-150 with its smaller engine. Also, I've never heard of F-150s having such fucked up problems as warped tail gates, cab/bed rubbing, etc.
I love how you change the subject of the topic. Why even bring up the f-150? This topic is about a tundra. It seems like you just want to start a fucking pissing match. And about the payload, ford claims 200 pounds more for the reg. cab long bed, but the toyota is rated 2100 pounds more when comparing the extended cab models. And the engine really doesnt have THAT much to do with towning and has very little to do with the payload. And just for a comparison, the toyota 5.7 makes 381hp and 401ft/lbs of torque. The ford 5.4 makes 300/365. The toyota makes more hp and torque per liter. Now to the transmission. The ford has as shitty 4 speed, while the toyota has a double overdrive 6 speed. Not to mention the tundra has better brakes, and a stronger rear end (you have learned that a rear end is not the bed by now, right?). Oh and despite the toyota making 81 more horsepower, it has the same fuel mileage rating.
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|