LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 702 users online 223005 members 915 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
baby lexii
Movies: twilight, underworld new moon the pian...
Mood: Carefree
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
4 online / 39 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic

Interesting...
Replies: 22Last Post Nov. 14, 2008 9:07pm by football
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 Email Print Favorite
( football )


Executive

Patron
Reply
Quote: from GeneCosta at 5:06 pm on Nov. 10, 2008

Quote: from football at 8:37 pm on Nov. 9, 2008

So I was thinking today about how Obama promised to "lower taxes for 95% of Americans", and it made me ask, "Does that mean less than 5% of Americans don't have to pay taxes?". That number seemed incredibly low to me, so I went online and looked it up. Turns out, as of 2006, about 41% of Americans don't pay any taxes to begin with, so how does Obama propose to cut their taxes?


http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/1410.html


That 41% number is incorrect. It does not factor in the difference between a payroll and income tax. Furthermore, to even qualify for the impoverished benefits, you have to file an income statement. So theoretically you are paying taxes.

"Don't have to pay any taxes" is an indigenous statement in lieu of events. The poor penny up for the property, sales, and gas tax, just like anyone else.

If you want to talk about tax breaks, you have only to look at the top income earners.


Did you even look at the link? Payroll taxes have nothing to do with it, that is tax that companies pay for the money they pay their employees. 41% of Americans don't pay income taxes. Are you trying to say that Obama is going to make sales and property taxes become something that is based off of your income too now? That is ridiculous, and would never happen.


9:21 pm on Nov. 9, 2008 | Joined: Mar. 2005 | Days Active: 243
Join to learn more about football Colorado, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,901 | Points: 3,878
LiveWire Humor
jakelong


Swami

Ad Free
Reply
http://www.cbpp.org/4-10-06tax2.pdf


TAX FOUNDATION FIGURES DO NOT REPRESENT MIDDLE-INCOME TAX BURDENS
Figures May Mislead Policymakers, Journalists,
and the Public


Greenspan Warns Against Seriously Flawed Approach Tax Foundation Uses

In a 2002 Congressional hearing, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan warned that the type
of approach the Tax Foundation uses
— dividing total tax receipts by the Gross Domestic Product (or a
similar measure), to determine the overall average tax rate (i.e., to determine the percentage of total
income in the nation that is paid in taxes) — is simply not valid. Greenspan flatly stated: "you can't use tax receipts over nominal GDP as a tax rate."

Chairman Greenspan explained one reason that such an approach is improper: although capital
gains taxes are counted as part of federal tax receipts, the capital gains income on which such taxes are paid is not counted in GDP. The Tax Foundation uses a closely related Commerce Department income measure — NNP, or Net National Product — that also omits capital gains income. Counting capital gains taxes as part of tax receipts, while failing to count as income the very capital gains income on which these taxes are paid, distorts — and inflates — average tax rates.



Two-Thirds of Tax Units Pay More Payroll Tax Than Income Tax
April 15 is synonymous with taxes in the United States, but most Americans actually pay more payroll taxes than federal income taxes. In 2006 workers and employers each paid 6.2 percent Social Security tax on the first $94,200 of earnings and 1.45 percent Medicare tax on all wages. While the statutory obligation to pay payroll taxes is split evenly between workers and employers, most economists believe that the employer tax usually translates into lower wages, so workers bear the full burden of the tax. Thus, the total payroll tax rate equals 15.3 percent of earnings for most workers.

About two-thirds of taxpayers owed more payroll taxes (including the employer portion) than individual income taxes in 2006. Many households (including most retirees) do not have any wage income and thus pay no payroll tax. Among households with wage earners, 86 percent have higher payroll taxes than income taxes, including almost all of those with incomes less than $40,000 and 94 percent of those with incomes less than $100,000. If only the employee portion of payroll taxes is considered, 44 percent of taxpayers and 56 percent of wage earners pay more payroll tax than income tax, including nearly 80 percent of earners with incomes less than $50,000.

The payroll tax is very regressive with respect to current income: The average tax rate falls as income rises. The income tax, in contrast, is progressive. The regressivity of the payroll tax is mitigated to a substantial extent when Social Security and Medicare benefits are considered as well (not shown).


http://www.urban.org/publications/1001065.html



-------
"Everyone helpin' each other whenever they can we makin' it happen, from nothin' to somethin'
That's how we be survivin'" - BEP


11:08 pm on Nov. 9, 2008 | Joined: Aug. 2005 | Days Active: 770
Join to learn more about jakelong California, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 14,332 | Points: 25,265
Forever Angel


Pectus Pectoris Memor

Sustainer
Reply
Quote: from GeneCosta at 11:06 pm on Nov. 9, 2008

That 41% number is incorrect. It does not factor in the difference between a payroll and income tax. Furthermore, to even qualify for the impoverished benefits, you have to file an income statement. So theoretically you are paying taxes.

"Don't have to pay any taxes" is an indigenous statement in lieu of events. The poor penny up for the property, sales, and gas tax, just like anyone else.

If you want to talk about tax breaks, you have only to look at the top income earners.


But there is a difference between income tax and payroll tax. Payroll 'tax' is a slight misnomer in the sense that it's a deduction that, in theory, a person will get a direct benefit from. They are 'taxes' primarily because they are not a voluntary deduction, but they are not that much different (in theory) from deductions for a personal retirement plan or a personal health plan.

Property and sales taxes, for the most part, have nothing to do with this argument as they are local (state and lower level) taxes. Obama has no reason to include people who pay those in his rhetoric.

Even though the rich pay into the (so-called) Social Security 'fund', there is a 'means' test for receiving that money back. Which, in that sense I guess, does make it a 'tax' for them.

-------
"God does not play dice" - Albert Einstein
"God does play dice" - Stephen Hawking

Bohica


9:14 am on Nov. 10, 2008 | Joined: Dec. 2005 | Days Active: 1,353
Join to learn more about Forever Angel Kansas, United States | Straight Female | Posts: 27,756 | Points: 54,159
PrideAndJoy


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from football at 8:37 pm on Nov. 9, 2008

So I was thinking today about how Obama promised to "lower taxes for 95% of Americans", and it made me ask, "Does that mean less than 5% of Americans don't have to pay taxes?". That number seemed incredibly low to me, so I went online and looked it up. Turns out, as of 2006, about 41% of Americans don't pay any taxes to begin with, so how does Obama propose to cut their taxes?

 
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/1410.html


You are wrong when you say 41% of American's don't pay ANY taxes. That's just absurd. Please educate yourself now.


11:51 am on Nov. 10, 2008 | Joined: Oct. 2008 | Days Active: 179
Join to learn more about PrideAndJoy Wisconsin, United States | Posts: 2,720 | Points: 4,176
whoisabs


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Most of those 41% are going to be getting a check in the mail that is higher than the amount they originally paid in taxes.

-------
whoisabs i'm not sure
Guess who's back?

11:59 am on Nov. 10, 2008 | Joined: Nov. 2006 | Days Active: 848
Join to learn more about whoisabs Texas, United States | Male | Posts: 22,382 | Points: 30,262
( football )


Executive

Patron
Reply
Quote: from PrideAndJoy at 7:51 am on Nov. 11, 2008

Quote: from football at 8:37 pm on Nov. 9, 2008

So I was thinking today about how Obama promised to "lower taxes for 95% of Americans", and it made me ask, "Does that mean less than 5% of Americans don't have to pay taxes?". That number seemed incredibly low to me, so I went online and looked it up. Turns out, as of 2006, about 41% of Americans don't pay any taxes to begin with, so how does Obama propose to cut their taxes?  

 
 http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/1410.html


You are wrong when you say 41% of American's don't pay ANY taxes. That's just absurd. Please educate yourself now.


And you are stupid when you pretend you thought I meant ALL taxes. We both know that Obama was referring to income tax, and if you had educated yourself, you would have known what I was talking about.


9:47 pm on Nov. 11, 2008 | Joined: Mar. 2005 | Days Active: 243
Join to learn more about football Colorado, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,901 | Points: 3,878
PrideAndJoy


Dairy Product Addict
Reply
Quote: from football at 9:47 pm on Nov. 11, 2008

Quote: from PrideAndJoy at 7:51 am on Nov. 11, 2008

Quote: from football at 8:37 pm on Nov. 9, 2008

So I was thinking today about how Obama promised to "lower taxes for 95% of Americans", and it made me ask, "Does that mean less than 5% of Americans don't have to pay taxes?". That number seemed incredibly low to me, so I went online and looked it up. Turns out, as of 2006, about 41% of Americans don't pay any taxes to begin with, so how does Obama propose to cut their taxes?

   
  http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/1410.html


 

 You are wrong when you say 41% of American's don't pay ANY taxes. That's just absurd. Please educate yourself now.


And you are stupid when you pretend you thought I meant ALL taxes. We both know that Obama was referring to income tax, and if you had educated yourself, you would have known what I was talking about.


"Turns out, as of 2006, about 41% of Americans don't pay any taxes to begin with."

Any. Yeah, you only meant income. Fuckhead. Either you are really that dumb or really that smart and attempting to mislead the blind following of the GOP,  as did Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly.


7:49 am on Nov. 13, 2008 | Joined: Oct. 2008 | Days Active: 179
Join to learn more about PrideAndJoy Wisconsin, United States | Posts: 2,720 | Points: 4,176
( football )


Executive

Patron
Reply
Quote: from PrideAndJoy at 3:49 am on Nov. 14, 2008

Quote: from football at 9:47 pm on Nov. 11, 2008

Quote: from PrideAndJoy at 7:51 am on Nov. 11, 2008

Quote: from football at 8:37 pm on Nov. 9, 2008

So I was thinking today about how Obama promised to "lower taxes for 95% of Americans", and it made me ask, "Does that mean less than 5% of Americans don't have to pay taxes?". That number seemed incredibly low to me, so I went online and looked it up. Turns out, as of 2006, about 41% of Americans don't pay any taxes to begin with, so how does Obama propose to cut their taxes?    

     
  http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/1410.html


  You are wrong when you say 41% of American's don't pay ANY taxes. That's just absurd. Please educate yourself now.


 

 And you are stupid when you pretend you thought I meant ALL taxes. We both know that Obama was referring to income tax, and if you had educated yourself, you would have known what I was talking about.


"Turns out, as of 2006, about 41% of Americans don't pay any taxes to begin with."

Any. Yeah, you only meant income. Fuckhead. Either you are really that dumb or really that smart and attempting to mislead the blind following of the GOP, as did Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly.



Ok, I will admit that I should have been smarter, remembered that there are morons like you out there, and spelled out exactly what I meant in idiot-proof detail, so they you wouldn't have to figure it out for yourself. Interestingly enough, what I did is no different than what Obama did, in saying one thing while actually meaning something slightly different, and expecting others to figure out the difference, yet when I do it I am a "fuckhead" but when he does that I am also a "fuckhead" for pointing it out.


9:07 pm on Nov. 14, 2008 | Joined: Mar. 2005 | Days Active: 243
Join to learn more about football Colorado, United States | Straight Male | Posts: 1,901 | Points: 3,878
Pages: 1 2 Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Political Teen / Viewing Topic