|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
Logic is reliable... prove me wrong |
|
|
|
 Replies: 15 — Last Post Oct. 11 2:22am by Cruizer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ancient Rights
Enlightened One
 Sustainer
Tech Support Leader
|
     
Over-rationalizing things can cause delay and inactivity. That is one of its problems.
-------
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384,
32768, 65536, 131072, 262144, 524288, 1048576, 2097152, 4194304, 8388608,
16777216, 33554432, 67108864, 134217728, 268435456, 536870912, 1073741824,
2147483648, 4294967296
|
|
|
|
|
LittleNutTammi
Quality Control Engineer
|
this statement is false
|
|
|
Violently Happy
Visionary
|
logic is dumb
-------
Give a man a fire, and he is warm for a day.
Set a man on fire, and he is warm for the rest of his life.
|
|
|
|
|
solitude
Soothsayer
 Patron
|
Quote: from fezzy at 8:43 am on Oct. 10, 2008
 Quote: from solitude at 11:38 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
logic isn't the only way
There's: Logos
Pathos and
Ethos I could argue that logic isn't reliable by using either Pathos or Ethos 
Since you gave one of the only legit answers, I'm going to respond to you. In a sense, you used logic to prove me wrong. To rephrase what you said: Logic is not the only way to prove logic isn't reliable.
There is logos, pathos, and ethos.
Therefore, pathos and ethos can be used to prove logic isn't reliable. Not exactly an example of deductive reasoning, but very similar. Care to argue back? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you; I'm just making sure I can defend my argument tomorrow.
Logic is wrong, do you not see how immoral it is to use logic at times? it takes away emotion and bases itself in fact completely. There's no feeling! There's no nature of humanity at all. It's so factual, that it's almost as if we didn't have a soul, as if we used the brain to an extreme point where we did not think about how our hearts felt rather than what our brains thought.
-------
Thank you greatescape11:)
You're welcome HatesYou
click for support
|
|
|
tonka
Quality Control Engineer
|
some people just dont like logic.
thats why they cant drive on the freeway.
-------
I don't have a box.
|
11:51 pm on Oct. 9, 2008 | Joined Sep. 2008 | 23 Days Active
Join to learn more about tonka California, United States | Straight Female | 423 Posts | 724 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
( fezzy )
Executive
|
Quote: from solitude at 11:46 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
Quote: from fezzy at 8:43 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:38 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
logic isn't the only way
There's: Logos
Pathos and
Ethos I could argue that logic isn't reliable by using either Pathos or Ethos
Since you gave one of the only legit answers, I'm going to respond to you. In a sense, you used logic to prove me wrong. To rephrase what you said: Logic is not the only way to prove logic isn't reliable.
There is logos, pathos, and ethos.
Therefore, pathos and ethos can be used to prove logic isn't reliable. Not exactly an example of deductive reasoning, but very similar. Care to argue back? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you; I'm just making sure I can defend my argument tomorrow.
Logic is wrong, do you not see how immoral it is to use logic at times? it takes away emotion and bases itself in fact completely. There's no feeling! There's no nature of humanity at all. It's so factual, that it's almost as if we didn't have a soul, as if we used the brain to an extreme point where we did not think about how our hearts felt rather than what our brains thought.
I would say now you are not using logic. You are using a fallacy--specifically Ad Misericordiam (or appeal to emotions)--which I have concluded is not a good argument. Although in truth I've enjoyed what you're saying. Mind if I use a little of what you wrote in my presentation tomorrow? Post edited at 11:54 pm on Oct. 9, 2008 by fezzy
-------
Ehyeh asher ehyeh - I am that I am
DannyZeff.com -- my website!
|
11:53 pm on Oct. 9, 2008 | Joined May 2007 | 183 Days Active
Join to learn more about fezzy California, United States | Straight Male | 1252 Posts | 3228 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
solitude
Soothsayer
Patron
|
Quote: from fezzy at 8:53 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:46 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
Quote: from fezzy at 8:43 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:38 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
logic isn't the only way
There's: Logos
Pathos and
Ethos I could argue that logic isn't reliable by using either Pathos or Ethos
Since you gave one of the only legit answers, I'm going to respond to you. In a sense, you used logic to prove me wrong. To rephrase what you said: Logic is not the only way to prove logic isn't reliable.
There is logos, pathos, and ethos.
Therefore, pathos and ethos can be used to prove logic isn't reliable. Not exactly an example of deductive reasoning, but very similar. Care to argue back? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you; I'm just making sure I can defend my argument tomorrow.
Logic is wrong, do you not see how immoral it is to use logic at times? it takes away emotion and bases itself in fact completely. There's no feeling! There's no nature of humanity at all. It's so factual, that it's almost as if we didn't have a soul, as if we used the brain to an extreme point where we did not think about how our hearts felt rather than what our brains thought.
I would say now you are not using logic. You are using a fallacy--specifically Ad Misericordiam (or appeal to emotions)--which I have concluded is not a good argument.
and I concluded logic is not a good argument.
-------
Thank you greatescape11:)
You're welcome HatesYou
click for support
|
|
|
( fezzy )
Executive
|
Quote: from solitude at 11:54 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
Quote: from fezzy at 8:53 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:46 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
Quote: from fezzy at 8:43 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:38 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
logic isn't the only way
There's: Logos
Pathos and
Ethos I could argue that logic isn't reliable by using either Pathos or Ethos
Since you gave one of the only legit answers, I'm going to respond to you. In a sense, you used logic to prove me wrong. To rephrase what you said: Logic is not the only way to prove logic isn't reliable.
There is logos, pathos, and ethos.
Therefore, pathos and ethos can be used to prove logic isn't reliable. Not exactly an example of deductive reasoning, but very similar. Care to argue back? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you; I'm just making sure I can defend my argument tomorrow.
Logic is wrong, do you not see how immoral it is to use logic at times? it takes away emotion and bases itself in fact completely. There's no feeling! There's no nature of humanity at all. It's so factual, that it's almost as if we didn't have a soul, as if we used the brain to an extreme point where we did not think about how our hearts felt rather than what our brains thought.
I would say now you are not using logic. You are using a fallacy--specifically Ad Misericordiam (or appeal to emotions)--which I have concluded is not a good argument.
and I concluded logic is not a good argument.
But you must have used logic to reach a conclusion.... or else it is a hasty generalization (another fallacy).
-------
Ehyeh asher ehyeh - I am that I am
DannyZeff.com -- my website!
|
11:56 pm on Oct. 9, 2008 | Joined May 2007 | 183 Days Active
Join to learn more about fezzy California, United States | Straight Male | 1252 Posts | 3228 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
solitude
Soothsayer
Patron
|
Quote: from fezzy at 8:56 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:54 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
Quote: from fezzy at 8:53 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:46 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
Quote: from fezzy at 8:43 am on Oct. 10, 2008
Quote: from solitude at 11:38 pm on Oct. 9, 2008
logic isn't the only way
There's: Logos
Pathos and
Ethos I could argue that logic isn't reliable by using either Pathos or Ethos
Since you gave one of the only legit answers, I'm going to respond to you. In a sense, you used logic to prove me wrong. To rephrase what you said: Logic is not the only way to prove logic isn't reliable.
There is logos, pathos, and ethos.
Therefore, pathos and ethos can be used to prove logic isn't reliable. Not exactly an example of deductive reasoning, but very similar. Care to argue back? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you; I'm just making sure I can defend my argument tomorrow.
Logic is wrong, do you not see how immoral it is to use logic at times? it takes away emotion and bases itself in fact completely. There's no feeling! There's no nature of humanity at all. It's so factual, that it's almost as if we didn't have a soul, as if we used the brain to an extreme point where we did not think about how our hearts felt rather than what our brains thought.
I would say now you are not using logic. You are using a fallacy--specifically Ad Misericordiam (or appeal to emotions)--which I have concluded is not a good argument.
and I concluded logic is not a good argument.
But you must have used logic to reach a conclusion.... or else it is a hasty generalization (another fallacy).
nope, I just listened to what my heart told me
-------
Thank you greatescape11:)
You're welcome HatesYou
click for support
|
|
|
CherryD
Omnipotent One
Sustainer
Support Leader
|
Logic is sometimes stiff. If everything goes along with logic it can't be flexible. People are unique in their ways because everyone has different feelings and one way we communicate is through our feelings. If things are all based by logic, we can never achieve what we have now.
-------
History Lesson:
Me: "Why do we need so many sources?"
Friend: "To go with our french fries?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| / / / Viewing Topic | |
|
321 users online 
186968 members 
You have 1 new message.
