|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
|
|
|
 LiveWire Humor
|
|
Killtyronedead
El Cowboy Rojo
Patron
|
What happened?
------- I was a mod once It was epic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Professional
Patron
Support Leader
|
Again with the time distortion problems. You posted on 5:24 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 (my time), it is now 2 AM on the 28th (my time). Do the math there. It has not been 24 hours, let alone a day and a half. It's important because a the more days you add on to a post, the more mod action against it becomes ridiculous. You were attempting to mount a case against Dot based on time, when you take any possible argument away from that, you're left with basically nothing. That's why it was pretty essential to correct your awfully inaccurate (and still inaccurate) times. And no, the topic was not removed to stroke mod ego. What sense would that make? The moderator who trashed it for the last time was the same moderator who brought the topic up in the mod forum for discussion, in the end resulting in the RIGHT decision of returning it to be made. Not to mention, if she did it just to "stroke her ego" as you seem to think, she wouldn't have bothered to message Bearsy and apologize sincerely for the actions of the other mod, nor would she have made SURE Bearsy understood exactly why it was being trashed for the last time. We trashed it to help BEARSY, not for any "mod ego" shit. We wanted to make sure Bearsy got as much help as possible, and as a way of showing our regret for the actions of the wrongful mod, we asked her to please repost the topic to make sure she got as many replies as she wanted. We could've refreshed it, but then we would've had a lot of cleaning up to do for the topic so people who not ask why it was trashed, or what happened with the trashing, and all that shit. It was a favor to Bearsy, nothing less, nothing more. You are trying to speak on this, yet you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about - and this is not the first time I've seen you try this as far as moderator actions go. Each time the topic was wrongly removed, the post was added BACK. When she filed a MER, it was returned in HER favor when the mistake became clear. When it was brought up in the mod forum, several moderators were absolutely appalled by the mistake. There was no "cover" up here, and you try to speak of one shows just how ignorant you are about the entire situation. If there was a "cover up," her post would've remained trashed, there would have been no MER returned in her favor, and there would have been no mod topic. Stop trying to make up an entire ridiculous theory just because you don't have all of the facts surrounding the situation. Simply because you are in the dark about some things does not mean you get the fill in the gaps of information with extreme mod corruption theories. EDIT TO YOUR LAST POST: If that's what Bearsy wants, that's what she will get to rectify the situation. We were all in agreeance that trashing it would benefit HER. If she disagrees, then I will return the topic and refresh it. Either way, that doesn't take away from your ridiculous theory, if anything, it fully invalidates it. EDIT: After confirmation from Bearsy, the topic has been restored and refreshed. MOD COVERUP DIDN'T EXIST OMGZ Post edited at 12:26 am on Oct. 28, 2008 by The Professional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Professional
Patron
Support Leader
|
You're tolerable when you aren't speaking on things out of ignorance, such as this. Our actions were aimed at correcting the mistake, not covering anything up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|