LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 411 users online 225118 members 195 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Memberlist | Dictionary | News | FAQ
Member Spotlight
gief
hey there sweet thang, hows about i buy you a fish sa...
Mood: Musical
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
3 online / 20 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / College Forums / College Alcohol & Substance Abuse / Adding Reply

Adding Reply
Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum.
Topic A.B. 390 - Marijuana Control, Regulation, and
Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds)
Password   Forgotten your password?
Post

Font:   Size:   Color:

FAQ Keyword Search:
Post Options
Favorites Manager
Notify me of new replies to this topic by email
Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message
Original Post
CaliKevin Posted at 1:19 am on Mar. 8, 2009
College students of California, I present to you...

AB 390 - Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act.

Here's the skinny:


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


  AB 390, as introduced, Ammiano. Marijuana Control, Regulation, and
Education Act.
  Existing state law provides that every person who possesses,
sells, transports, or cultivates marijuana, concentrated cannabis, or
derivatives of marijuana, except as authorized by law, is guilty of
one or more crimes.
  This bill would remove marijuana and its derivatives from existing
statutes defining and regulating controlled substances. It would
instead legalize the possession, sale, cultivation, and other conduct
relating to marijuana and its derivatives by persons 21 years of age
and older, except as specified. It would set up a wholesale and
retail marijuana sales regulation program, including special fees to
fund drug abuse prevention programs, as specified, to commence after
regulations concerning the program have been issued, and federal law
permits possession and sale consistent with the program. It would ban
local and state assistance in enforcing inconsistent federal and
other laws relating to marijuana, and would provide specified
infraction penalties for violations of these new marijuana laws and
regulations, as specified. It would make other conforming changes.
  By creating various infractions for violations of regulations and
laws created by this act, this bill would impose a state-mandated
local program.
  The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
  This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
  Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.


As introduced, this groundbreaking proposal would raise over $1 billion in annual revenue by taxing the retail production and sale of marijuana for adults over 21 years of age.

And links:

AB 390 INTRODUCED

Take Action - Contact Officials

Support California Assembly Bill 390 (the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act)

Feel free to add anything you think might be missing.

Replies
neverjeeps Posted at 1:26 am on Mar. 8, 2009
this is really cool, doubt it will pass but it just brings more awareness to the cause.
with out phelps none of this would be possible
CaliKevin Posted at 1:26 am on Mar. 8, 2009
Quote: from prisoner of hss at 1:20 am on Mar. 8, 2009

21 years or older  

should be 12


Maybe some day, but for now this will have to do. It should have never been prohibited in the first place, but it's been that way for so long now it's nearly impossible to completely undo.
purp0se Posted at 1:21 am on Mar. 8, 2009
Post from this position was omitted due to content violations
NZ Guy Posted at 1:21 am on Mar. 8, 2009
Post from this position was omitted due to content violations
iconoclast Posted at 1:20 am on Mar. 8, 2009
21 years or older

should be 12

All 5 previous replies displayed.