| Replies
|
|
|
jonlester31
|
Posted at 1:24 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from Vintorez at 4:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
He's average, not good, nor bad.
then give me a list of who you consider 5good, average, and bad each |
|
|
Vintorez
|
Posted at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 |
| He's average, not good, nor bad. |
|
|
jonlester31
|
Posted at 12:49 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from Vintorez at 3:46 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 2:21 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:14 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:12 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
Randy johnson has shown that he can still compete, but he's far from the athlete he used to be Wakefield was never good Schilling is retired (or he said he was) they're all washed up 
Wakefield was never good is a retarded thing to say. He basiclly carried the Pirates to a WS on his back.
wtf are you talking about? the pirates haven't won a WS since 1979 nor have they been seen in a WS game since please stop talking baseball out of your ass 
yeah I worded that wrong. he was phenominal in the 92Pennant but his other pitchers weren't so lucky. And a NL Rookie Pitcher of the Year(wich he was) means he must be good.
do you know how many "rookie of the years" ended up being flops? it happens all the damn time, you can't say a player is good based on playing well in one year of your career. Oh, and Wakefield never won Rookie of the year. And all the starters from the 92 Pirates were good, so i dunno where you get "the others weren't so lucky". Where do you get your info? 
I don't see how you don't think Wakefield has never been good. |
|
|
Vintorez
|
Posted at 12:46 pm on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from jonlester31 at 2:21 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:14 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:12 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
Randy johnson has shown that he can still compete, but he's far from the athlete he used to be Wakefield was never good Schilling is retired (or he said he was) they're all washed up 
Wakefield was never good is a retarded thing to say. He basiclly carried the Pirates to a WS on his back.
wtf are you talking about? the pirates haven't won a WS since 1979 nor have they been seen in a WS game since please stop talking baseball out of your ass 
yeah I worded that wrong. he was phenominal in the 92Pennant but his other pitchers weren't so lucky. And a NL Rookie Pitcher of the Year(wich he was) means he must be good.
do you know how many "rookie of the years" ended up being flops? it happens all the damn time, you can't say a player is good based on playing well in one year of your career. Oh, and Wakefield never won Rookie of the year. And all the starters from the 92 Pirates were good, so i dunno where you get "the others weren't so lucky". Where do you get your info? |
|
|
jonlester31
|
Posted at 11:21 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:23 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:14 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:12 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
Randy johnson has shown that he can still compete, but he's far from the athlete he used to be Wakefield was never good Schilling is retired (or he said he was) they're all washed up 
Wakefield was never good is a retarded thing to say. He basiclly carried the Pirates to a WS on his back.
wtf are you talking about? the pirates haven't won a WS since 1979 nor have they been seen in a WS game since please stop talking baseball out of your ass 
yeah I worded that wrong. he was phenominal in the 92Pennant but his other pitchers weren't so lucky. And a NL Rookie Pitcher of the Year(wich he was) means he must be good. |
|
|
Vintorez
|
Posted at 10:23 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:14 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:12 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
Randy johnson has shown that he can still compete, but he's far from the athlete he used to be Wakefield was never good Schilling is retired (or he said he was) they're all washed up 
Wakefield was never good is a retarded thing to say. He basiclly carried the Pirates to a WS on his back.
wtf are you talking about? the pirates haven't won a WS since 1979 nor have they been seen in a WS game since please stop talking baseball out of your ass |
|
|
jonlester31
|
Posted at 10:14 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from Vintorez at 1:12 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
Randy johnson has shown that he can still compete, but he's far from the athlete he used to be Wakefield was never good Schilling is retired (or he said he was) they're all washed up 
Wakefield was never good is a retarded thing to say. He basiclly carried the Pirates to a WS on his back. |
|
|
Vintorez
|
Posted at 10:12 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
Randy johnson has shown that he can still compete, but he's far from the athlete he used to be Wakefield was never good Schilling is retired (or he said he was) they're all washed up |
|
|
jonlester31
|
Posted at 10:11 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from madrascal32 at 1:10 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
6W 9L 3.99ERA 80K 161H 80R his era isn't too bad. 
it's because he has no run support, he was a Padre after all |
|
|
madrascal32
|
Posted at 10:10 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
| 6W 9L 3.99ERA 80K 161H 80R his era isn't too bad. |
|
|
jonlester31
|
Posted at 10:07 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from robdude at 1:06 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
did i say that einstien?
you're just saying that because he's old, right? So he's under .500 maybe it's because he was with the padres |
|
|
Jadien
|
Posted at 10:06 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
| Point? |
|
|
robdude
|
Posted at 10:06 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from jonlester31 at 1:05 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too?
did i say that einstien? |
|
|
carnage44
|
Posted at 10:05 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
| he still has enough in the tank to help them. |
|
|
jonlester31
|
Posted at 10:05 am on Aug. 19, 2008 |
Quote: from robdude at 1:03 pm on Aug. 19, 2008
he's washed up
so do you think Randy Johnson, Tim Wakefield, and Curt Schilling are washed up too? |
|
|
Most recent 15 of 21 previous replies displayed. |
|