Adding Reply Archived Topic: It will not be bumped to the top of the forum. Topic The power of the ps3 Membername   Not a member? Sign Up Free (takes 20 seconds) Password   Forgotten your password? Post Font: Verdana Arial Black Georgia Comic Sans Impact   Size: Tiny Normal Big Huge   Color: Default Dark Red Red Orange Brown Green Olive Cyan Blue Dark Blue Indigo Black [ Check Spelling ] [ Post Preview ] [ LiveTags ] FAQ Keyword Search: Post Options Favorites Manager Notify me of new replies to this topic by email Notify me of new replies to this topic by private message Original Post I heart nubs Posted at 11:20 pm on Aug. 25, 2008 Now this is what the ps3 is all about. This has to be the most advanced cgi I've ever seen. And it's in realtime. So sick. Watch in hd here : http://www.gametrailers.com/player/10758.html

Replies emo sux69 Posted at 3:33 am on Aug. 28, 2008 thats the most fail i have ever seen her mouth looks like someone with down syndrome, they did better with the original playstaion. mysticgohan Posted at 6:53 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from I heart nubs at 5:58 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from mysticgohan at 9:40 am on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from I heart nubs at 9:50 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Quote: from mysticgohan at 8:31 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Pixar movies tend to have better CGI then this, aside from the earlier titles. The motions aren't very fluid and the eyes and mouth look pretty bad. It's cool graphics for a game and a nice step away from Brown+Bloom = Real though   Yes pixar has better cgi because it's prerendered. Morons.    Your point? You also have stuff like "Emily" which although it won't be running on anything from this gen blows this game out of the water.    Then you have unquantifiable cgi in more artistic games. you have no idea what you are talking about. Realism =/= Quality. When technology advances to the point where Heavy Rain's graphics engine is considered obsolete it will look like a joke. In turn games with a more artistic approach to the design will hold up more. Examples: Donkey Kong Country vs Mario World 1/2 Mortal Kombat(All) vs Street Fighter(All) And dozens of others. I never said it wasn't a good looking game I said it was neither the best looking work of CGI(pre-rendered or "in-game") and I stated that realism isn't always the best approach. I heart nubs Posted at 5:58 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from mysticgohan at 9:40 am on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from I heart nubs at 9:50 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Quote: from mysticgohan at 8:31 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Pixar movies tend to have better CGI then this, aside from the earlier titles. The motions aren't very fluid and the eyes and mouth look pretty bad. It's cool graphics for a game and a nice step away from Brown+Bloom = Real though    Yes pixar has better cgi because it's prerendered. Morons. Your point? You also have stuff like "Emily" which although it won't be running on anything from this gen blows this game out of the water. Then you have unquantifiable cgi in more artistic games. you have no idea what you are talking about. Dannay Posted at 1:16 pm on Aug. 27, 2008 Looks coolies mysticgohan Posted at 9:40 am on Aug. 27, 2008 Quote: from I heart nubs at 9:50 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Quote: from mysticgohan at 8:31 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Pixar movies tend to have better CGI then this, aside from the earlier titles. The motions aren't very fluid and the eyes and mouth look pretty bad. It's cool graphics for a game and a nice step away from Brown+Bloom = Real though Yes pixar has better cgi because it's prerendered. Morons. Your point? You also have stuff like "Emily" which although it won't be running on anything from this gen blows this game out of the water. Then you have unquantifiable cgi in more artistic games. allsmiles Posted at 3:35 am on Aug. 27, 2008 That does not stop it from being CGI. I heart nubs Posted at 9:50 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Quote: from mysticgohan at 8:31 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Pixar movies tend to have better CGI then this, aside from the earlier titles. The motions aren't very fluid and the eyes and mouth look pretty bad. It's cool graphics for a game and a nice step away from Brown+Bloom = Real though Yes pixar has better cgi because it's prerendered. Morons. mysticgohan Posted at 8:31 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Pixar movies tend to have better CGI then this, aside from the earlier titles. The motions aren't very fluid and the eyes and mouth look pretty bad. It's cool graphics for a game and a nice step away from Brown+Bloom = Real though I heart nubs Posted at 6:48 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 You kids are all so retarded and have no idea what you're talking about. Ju5tin Posted at 6:35 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 The graphics look pretty good, but the voices are totally off... And I honestly don't see any reason to get excited about this title... :\ what the mong Posted at 6:16 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 good graphics but not impressed.... Ju5tin Posted at 3:10 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 OMG BROWN+BLOOM FAKE FAKE FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE REALISM allsmiles Posted at 6:48 am on Aug. 26, 2008 Almost the most... I think it was only a couple of days ago that "Emily" was posted here. Also, movies have more impressive GCI :P mysticgohan Posted at 6:41 am on Aug. 26, 2008 That's the most advanced CGI you've seen. . . allsmiles Posted at 6:19 am on Aug. 26, 2008 Quote: from King kong at 1:24 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Quote: from allsmiles at 12:29 pm on Aug. 26, 2008 Quote: from quietboy at 11:17 am on Aug. 26, 2008 That's a point, so far I've seen that kitchen about 5 times and someone on a motorcycle in the rain. That doesn't look like a great game to me.    They're not revealing anything about the plot. what about ganre. Based on the gameplay trailer (again, not related to the plot in any way) it seems to be action/mystery. I really hope so, the genre is so lacking in games, it needs a high profile one. Most recent 15 of 24 previous replies displayed.