| Replies
|
|
|
Dannay
|
Posted at 10:21 am on Oct. 28, 2008 |
| it's ok. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 8:00 am on Oct. 28, 2008 |
Quote: from espresso8097 at 6:18 am on Oct. 28, 2008
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 12:23 am on Oct. 28, 2008
I don't listen to you. That, and the post wasn't even directed at you so why even respond? You're like a child that walks into the middle of a movie. Absolutely no frame of reference or understanding of the topic, whatsoever. Please go. 
Then don't use second person incorrectly, not that hard. Now you have used second person properly, but that does not make what how you used it earlier any better. I know you weren't talking to me, or to anybody for that matter. You were talking about your own ideas and hoping someone would read it. Did you even pass eighth grade? Really, second person usage is covered by then. 
Actually, in the original post you quoted I was not even trying to use second person (or at least I wasn't really aware of it). I also quoted Eric, so yeah, I was sort of responding to him.. In addition; yeah I do pretty good on school. My lowest grade in recollection was a B-. I've got a weak 94 average unfortunately, been slacking off pretty bad this year. Then again its high school, one big fucking joke as far as education goes. So far I haven't even learned anything this year that I didn't know already. Its actually so bad, I'm taking a few courses from Brigham Young University just because I feel like high school is a waste of my time. |
|
|
i r sekz
|
Posted at 7:41 am on Oct. 28, 2008 |
| Not a fan. |
|
|
espresso8097
|
Posted at 6:18 am on Oct. 28, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 12:23 am on Oct. 28, 2008
I don't listen to you. That, and the post wasn't even directed at you so why even respond? You're like a child that walks into the middle of a movie. Absolutely no frame of reference or understanding of the topic, whatsoever. Please go. 
Then don't use second person incorrectly, not that hard. Now you have used second person properly, but that does not make what how you used it earlier any better. I know you weren't talking to me, or to anybody for that matter. You were talking about your own ideas and hoping someone would read it. Did you even pass eighth grade? Really, second person usage is covered by then. |
|
|
muphnplutonic
|
Posted at 1:40 am on Oct. 28, 2008 |
| Yerp |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 10:23 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
| I don't listen to you. That, and the post wasn't even directed at you so why even respond? You're like a child that walks into the middle of a movie. Absolutely no frame of reference or understanding of the topic, whatsoever. Please go. |
|
|
espresso8097
|
Posted at 9:17 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
Quote: from Punkrocker 1992 at 8:18 pm on Oct. 27, 2008
Quote: from IMPALA at 4:06 pm on Oct. 27, 2008
you haven't been in the lower states much then. they don't put gray plastic bumpers on 00+ models. it's all color match. 
There are two Cavalier's in Nikiski. One is white, of the generation you pictured, with black plastic bumpers and steal rims. The second is a sort of blue color, with gray plastic bumpers and some steel rims, some with Fred Meyer's hub caps. I don't doubt they're good cars, but they're really cheap.. On par with Escort and Aspire. Tempo is many things that are not good, but one thing I love about it is you don't get the sense its a true economy car. 
Stop using second person. I know you don't get the sense its as true economy car, but you don't have to force your ideals on me. I do get the sense its a true economy car! |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 8:31 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
Quote: from IMPALA at 6:26 pm on Oct. 27, 2008
I do understand it's an economy car I'm just simply saying it's a nice looking car 
It is. I wouldn't say its better (nor worse) then any other economy car. However beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It is my humble opinion the Ford Tempo is the best looking "economy" car. |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 6:26 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
| I do understand it's an economy car I'm just simply saying it's a nice looking car |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 6:18 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
Quote: from IMPALA at 4:06 pm on Oct. 27, 2008
you haven't been in the lower states much then. they don't put gray plastic bumpers on 00+ models. it's all color match. 
There are two Cavalier's in Nikiski. One is white, of the generation you pictured, with black plastic bumpers and steal rims. The second is a sort of blue color, with gray plastic bumpers and some steel rims, some with Fred Meyer's hub caps. I don't doubt they're good cars, but they're really cheap.. On par with Escort and Aspire. Tempo is many things that are not good, but one thing I love about it is you don't get the sense its a true economy car. |
|
|
espresso8097
|
Posted at 5:38 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
| One of the best Cavs I have seen, but there are better. |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 4:06 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
| you haven't been in the lower states much then. they don't put gray plastic bumpers on 00+ models. it's all color match. |
|
|
FTF
|
Posted at 3:50 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
| Cavaliers do not look nice. Please. Also, showing that 1 Z24 in decent condition hardly is a good representative of all Cavalier's. That would be like me taking a top end '92 XR5 Topaz as a representative of all the piece of shit rusted out GL's. In fact I don't think I've ever seen a Cavalier without a unpainted gray plastic bumper and steel rims without hubcaps. From the factory! Even lowly Tempo was never that cheap.. |
|
|
soldierofjustice3
|
Posted at 3:32 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
| About as nice as a cav can I get I suppose. |
|
|
IMPALA
|
Posted at 3:08 pm on Oct. 27, 2008 |
| http://www.motortrend.com/cars/2002/chevrolet/cavalier/packages_options/index.html 2002 Cavalier Packages Base Preferred Equipment Group - $0 Base Sport Package - $850 Value Sport Appearance Package - $500 |
|
|
Most recent 15 of 40 previous replies displayed. |